Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T10:52:40.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A literature review of the role of brachytherapy in the management of early-stage breast cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2019

Rebecca Thorpe*
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
Heather Drury-Smith
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Rebecca Thorpe, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Robert Winston Building, Collegiate Campus, Broomhall Road, Sheffield S10 2BP, UK. E-mail: Rebecca.E.Thorpe@student.shu.ac.uk

Abstract

Background:

This review evaluates whether brachytherapy can be considered as an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) using criteria such as local recurrence rates, overall survival rates and quality of life (QoL) factors. This is an important issue because of a decline in local recurrence rates, suggesting that some women at very low risk of recurrence may be incurring the negative long-term side effects of WBI without benefitting from a reduction in local recurrence and greater overall survival. As such, the purpose of this literature review is to evaluate whether brachytherapy is a credible alternative to external beam radiation with a particular focus on the impact it has on patient QoL.

Methods:

The search terms used were devised by using the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome framework, and a literature search was carried out using Boolean connectors and Medical Subject Headings in the PubMed database. The resultant articles were manually assessed for relevance and appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network tool. Additional papers were sourced from the citations of articles found using the search strategy. Government guidelines and regulations were also used following a manual search on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence website. This process resulted in a total of 30 sources being included as part of the review.

Results:

Three types of brachytherapy were the foundation for the majority of the papers found: interstitial multi-catheter brachytherapy, intra-cavity brachytherapy and permanent seed implantation. The key themes that arose from the literature were that brachytherapy is equivalent to WBI both in terms of 5-year local recurrence rates and overall survival rates at 10–12 years. The findings showed that brachytherapy was superior to WBI for some QoL factors such as being less time-consuming and equal in terms of others such as breast cosmesis. The results did also show that brachytherapy does come with its own local toxicities that could impact upon QoL such as the poor breast cosmesis associated with some brachytherapy techniques.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, brachytherapy was deemed a safe or acceptable alternative to WBI, but there is a need for further research on the long-term local recurrence rates, survival rates and quality of life issues as the volume of evidence is still significantly smaller for brachytherapy than for WBI. Specifically, there needs to be further investigation as to which patients will benefit from being offered brachytherapy and the influence that factors such as co-morbidities, performance status and patient choice play in these decisions.

Type
Literature Review
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE]. Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and management. NG101. 2018. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng101/evidence/evidence-review-h-breast-radiotherapy-pdf-4904666613. Accessed on 17th February 2019.Google Scholar
Lehman, M, Hickey, B.The less than whole breast radiotherapy approach. The Breast 2010; 19 (3): 180187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correa, C, Harris, E, Leonardi, Met al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: executive summary for the update of an ASTRO evidence-based consensus statement. Prac Radiat Oncol 2017; 7 (2): 7379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCormick, B, Winter, K, Hudis, Cet al. RTOG 9804: a prospective randomized trial for good-risk ductal carcinoma in situ comparing radiotherapy with observation. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33 (7): 709715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Julian, T, Costantino, J, Vicini, Fet al. Early toxicity results with 3-D Conformal External Beam Therapy (CEBT) from the NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81 (2): S7S7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE]. Brachytherapy as the sole method of adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer after local excision. IPG268. 2008. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg268/evidence/overview-pdf-310783357. Accessed on 17th February 2019.Google Scholar
Strnad, V, Ott, O, Hildebrandt, Get al. 5-year results of accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation with boost after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2016; 387 (10015): 229238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skowronek, J, Chicheł, A.Brachytherapy in breast cancer: an effective alternative. Menopause Rev 2014; 13 (1): 4855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goyal, S, Kearney, T, Haffty, B.Current application and research directions for partial-breast irradiation. Oncology 2007; 21 (4): 449461.Google ScholarPubMed
Department of Health and Social Care. Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 [IRMER]. London: Stationery Office, 201 7.Google Scholar
de Medeiros, M, Veiga, D, Neto, M, Abla, L, Juliano, Y, Ferreira, L.Depression and conservative surgery for breast cancer. Clinics 2010; 65 (12): 12911294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Radiologists. Post-Operative Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer: UK Consensus Statements. London: The Royal College of Radiologists, 2016.Google Scholar
Agee, J.Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process. Int J Qualitat Studies Edu 2009; 22 (4): 431447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denney, A S, Tewksbury, R.How to write a literature review. J Crim Justice Educ 2013; 24 (2): 218234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of Illinois. Evidence based medicine. 2019. https://researchguides.uic.edu/c.php?g=252338&p=3954402. Accessed on 17th February 2019.Google Scholar
Ecker, E D, Skelly, A C.Conducting a winning literature search. Evid Based Spine Care J 2010; 1 (1): 914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strnad, V, Major, T, Polgar, Cet al. ESTRO-ACROP guideline: interstitial multi-catheter breast brachytherapy as accelerated partial breast irradiation alone or as boost – GEC-ESTRO breast cancer working group practical recommendations. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128 (3): 411420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wazer, D, Berle, L, Graham, Ret al. Preliminary results of a phase I/II study of HDR brachytherapy alone for T1/T2 breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 53 (4): 889897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niehoff, P, Polgár, C, Ostertag, Het al. Clinical experience with the MammoSite® radiation therapy system for brachytherapy of breast cancer: results from an international phase II trial. Radiother Oncol 2006; 79 (3): 316320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belkacémi, Y, Chauvet, M, Giard, Set al. Partial breast irradiation as sole therapy for low risk breast carcinoma: early toxicity, cosmesis and quality of life results of a MammoSite brachytherapy phase II study. Radiother Oncol 2009; 90 (1): 2329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Campos, T, Nogueira, L, Trindade, B, Cuperschmid, E.Dosimetric intercomparison of permanent Ho-166 seed’s implants and HDR Ir-192 brachytherapy in breast cancer. Rep Prac Oncol Radiother 2016; 21 (3): 240249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 2011; 378 (9804): 17071716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentzen, S M, Agrawal, R K, Aird, Eet al. The UK standardisation of breast radiotherapy (START) trial B of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2008; 371 (9618): 10981107.Google ScholarPubMed
Strnad, V, Hildebrandt, G, Pötter, Ret al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: 5-year results of the German-Austrian multi-center Phase II trial using interstitial multi-catheter brachytherapy alone after breast-conserving surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 80 (1): 1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polgár, C, Major, T, Fodor, Jet al. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation using high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy: 12-year update of a prospective clinical study. Radiother Oncol 2010; 94 (3): 274279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polgár, C, Fodor, J, Major, T, Sulyok, Z, Kásler, M.Breast-conserving therapy with partial or whole breast irradiation: ten-year results of the Budapest randomized trial. Radiother Oncol 2013; 108 (2): 197202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, J, Wawrzyniak-Hojczyk, M, Ambrochowicz, K.Brachytherapy in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) – review of treatment methods. J Contemp Brachyther 2012; 4 (3): 152164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lettmaier, S, Kreppner, S, Lotter, Met al. Radiation exposure of the heart, lung and skin by radiation therapy for breast cancer: a dosimetric comparison between partial breast irradiation using multicatheter brachytherapy and whole breast teletherapy. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100 (2): 189194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Early Breast Cancer Triallists’ Collaborative Group. Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2000; 355 (9217): 17571770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Estimating the risks of breast cancer radiotherapy: evidence from modern radiation doses to the lungs and heart and from previous randomized trials. J Clin Oncol: Offic J Am Soc Clin Oncol 2017; 35 (15): 16411649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benitez, P, Chen, P, Vicini, Fet al. Surgical considerations in the treatment of early stage breast cancer with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in breast conserving therapy via intersitial brachytherapy. Am J Surg 2004; 188 (4): 355364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepel, J, Leonard, K, Sha, Set al. Non-Invasive Image-Guided Breast Brachytherapy (NIBB) to deliver Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): analysis of acute toxicity and early outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90: S136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, G, Wilkinson, J, Moody, Aet al. The Cambridge breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy trial: patient- and treatment-related factors that influence late toxicity. Clin Oncol 2011; 23 (10): 662673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrucci, E, Lancellotta, V, Bini, Vet al. Quality of life and cosmesis after breast cancer: whole breast radiotherapy vs partial breast high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Tumori J 2015; 101 (2): 161167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soror, T, Kovács, G, Kovács, Áet al. New objective method in reporting the breast cosmetic results changes following breast conserving surgery and adjuvant intensity modulated multichannel partial breast brachytherapy: the Objective Breast Cosmesis Scale (OBCS). Brachytherapy 2016; 15 (5): 631636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadasadawala, T, Budrukkar, A, Chopra, Set al. Quality of life after accelerated partial breast irradiation in early breast cancer: matched pair analysis with protracted whole breast radiotherapy. Clin Oncol 2009; 21 (9): 668675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar