Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:42:41.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Redistricting Out Descriptive Representation: The Harmful Effect of Splitting ZIP Codes on the Constituent–Representative Link

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2022

Tyler S. Steelman*
Affiliation:
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
John A. Curiel
Affiliation:
Ohio Northern University, Ada, OH, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: tsteelman@unc.edu
Get access

Abstract

Redistricting poses a potential harm to American voters in limiting choice and accountability at the polls. Although voters still retain their right to contact their representatives, research shows that the confusion created when redistricting divides ZIP codes confounds the constituent–representative link. We build on existing research that shows splitting ZIP codes across multiple congressional districts leads to harms in representation. Specifically, we examine the role of splitting ZIP codes on the recognition of the racial group membership of one’s Congressional representative, a foundational component of the descriptive representation of racial minority voters via minority–majority districts in the United States. We find that citizens living in split ZIP codes are significantly less likely to know the race of their member of Congress. This occurs even when controlling for a host of factors including the race and partisanship of the constituent, the tenure of the member, and the amount of time a constituent has lived in their congressional district. Our work provides further evidence of the democratic harms experienced by American citizens living in ZIP codes that are split between multiple congressional districts. This work also points to the representational harms produced by poor district design on the representation of American voters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Race, Ethnicity, and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angrist, JD and Pischke, J-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S and Schaffner, BF (2018). “CCES Common Content, 2008–2016.”. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GDF6Z0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S, Brady, D and Fiorina, M (1992) The vanishing marginals and electoral responsiveness. British Journal of Political Science 22, 2138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banducci, S, Donovan, T and Karp, JA (2004) Minority representation, empowerment, and participation. Journal of Politics 66, 534556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, EC and Wilson, JQ (1963) City Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barabas, J and Jerit, J (2004) Redistricting principles and racial representation. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4, 415435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, DC (2014) Boundaries, redistricting criteria, and representation in the U.S. house of representatives. American Politics Research 42, 856895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, DC and Clark, CJ (2014) Revisiting descriptive representation in congress. Political Research Quarterly 67, 695707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, DC and Greene, Z (2014) Should we measure professionalism with an index? A note on theory and practice in state legislative professionalism research. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 14, 277296.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, JM, Kimball, DC, Meinke, SR and Tate, K (2003) The effects of political representation on the electoral advantages of house incumbents. Political Research Quarterly 56, 259270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, DE (2014) Distorted communication, unequal representation: constituents communicate less to representatives not of their race. American Journal of Political Science 58, 307321.Google Scholar
Cain, BE, Ferejohn, JA and Fiorina, MP (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calidas, D (2008) Hindsight is 20/20: revisiting the reapportionment cases to gain perspective on partisan gerrymanders. Duke Law Journal 57, 14131417.Google Scholar
Cameron, C, Epstein, D and O’Halloran, S (1996) Do majority-minority districts maximize substantive black representation in congress? American Political Science Review 90, 794812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, DT (1999). Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J and Jonathan, R (2013) Unintentional gerrymandering: political geography and electoral bias in legislatures. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8, 239269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, CJ (2019) Gaining Voice: Causes and Consequences of Black Representation in the American States. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespin, MH (2005) Using geographic information systems to measure district change, 2000–2002. Political Analysis 13(3):253260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curiel, JA and Steelman, TS (2018) Redistricting out representation: democratic harms in splitting zip codes. Election Law Journal 17, 328353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curiel, JA and Steelman, T (2020) A response to “tests for unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering in a post-gill world” in a post-Rucho world. Election Law Journal 19, 101109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J (1954). The Public and its Problems. Columbus, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, D, Herron, MC, O’Halloran, S and Park, D (2007) Estimating the effect of redistricting on minority substantive representation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23, 499518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, D and O’Halloran, S (1999) A social science approach to race, redistricting, and representation. American Political Science Review 93, 187191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eulau, H and Karps, PD (1977) The puzzle of representation: specifying components of responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2, 233254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, C (2002) Spirals of trust? The effect of descriptive representation on the relationship between citizens and government. American Journal of Political Science 46, 717732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, CR (2011) Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, CR, Mangum, M and Martin, CD (2007) Race, political empowerment, and constituency service: descriptive representation and the hiring of African American congressional staff. Polity 39, 449478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, JT (1982) A note on the nature of Soviet totalitarianism. Soviet Studies 34, 367376.Google Scholar
Hicks, WD, Klarner, CE, McKee, SC and Smith, DA (2018) Revisiting majority-minority districts and black representation. Political Research Quarterly 71, 408423.Google Scholar
Jewell, ME and Morehouse, SM (2001) Political Parties and Elections in American States. 4 ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Knoll, BR (2009) Determinants of Latino social support in the U.S. congress. Social Science Quarterly 90, 179195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, JB, DeVine, B, Pitcher, L and Martis, KC (2013). Digital Boundary Definitions of United States Congressional Districts, 1789-2012 (Districts from 93rd to 113th Congresses. http://cdmaps.polisci.ucla.edu [Retrieved on June 30, 2015].Google Scholar
Lublin, D (1997) The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, D (1999) Racial redistricting and African-American representation: a critique of “do majority-minority districts maximize substantive black representation in congress? American Political Science Review 93, 183186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J (1999) Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent yes. Journal of Politics 61, 628657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J (2003) Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review 97, 515528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, D (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolar, A (1996) Civil society after communism: from opposition to atomization. Journal of Democracy 7, 2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, CM (1993) Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, K (2003a) Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, K (2003b) Black opinion on the legitimacy of racial redistricting and minority-majority districts. American Political Science Review 97, 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, C and Wiseman, AE (2018). Legislative Effectiveness Data from 93rd-110th Congress (1973-2008). Available at https://thelawmakers.org/data-download (accessed 14 December 2019).Google Scholar
Winburn, J and Wagner, MW (2010) Carving voters out: redistricting’s influence on political information, turnout, and voting behavior. Political Research Quarterly 63, 373386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolak, J (2009) The consequences of concurrent campaigns for citizen knowledge of congressional candidates. Political Behavior 31, 211229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Steelman and Curiel supplementary material

Steelman and Curiel supplementary material

Download Steelman and Curiel supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 37.2 KB