Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-jtg5s Total loading time: 0.188 Render date: 2021-09-22T21:52:04.522Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Minority Success in Non-Majority Minority Districts: Finding the “Sweet Spot”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2019

David Lublin*
Affiliation:
American University
Lisa Handley
Affiliation:
Frontier International Electoral Consulting
Thomas L. Brunell
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Dallas
Bernard Grofman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
*Corresponding
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: D. Lublin, Department of Government, School of Public Affairs, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC20016. E-mail: dlublin@american.edu
Get access

Abstract

Though African-American and Latino electoral success in state legislative and congressional elections continues to occur almost entirely in majority-minority districts, minorities now have new opportunities in districts that are only 40–50% minority. This success can primarily be explained in terms of a curvilinear model that generates a “sweet spot” of maximum likelihood of minority candidate electoral success as a function of minority population share of the district and the proportion of the district that votes Republican. Past racial redistricting legal challenges often focused on cracking concentrated racial minorities to prevent the creation of majority-minority districts. Future lawsuits may also follow in the steps of recent successful court challenges against racially motivated packing that resulted in the reduction of minority population percentage in a previously majority-minority district in order to enhance minority opportunity in an adjacent non-majority-minority district.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Race, Ethnicity, and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrajano, Marisa, and Hajnal, Zoltan L.. 2015. White Backlash: Immigration, Race, and American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 6387.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Persily, Nathaniel, and Stewart, Charles. 2010. “Race, Region, and Vote Choice in the 2008 Election: Implications for the Future of the Voting Rights Act.” Harvard Law Review 123 (6): 152.Google Scholar
Barreto, Matthew A., Segura, Gary M., and Woods, Nathan D.. 2004. “The Mobilizing Effect of Majority-Minority Districts on Latino Turnout.” American Political Science Review 98 (1): 6575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Kimball, Grofman, Bernard, Handley, Lisa, and Niemi, Richard. 1988. “Minority Voting Equality: The 65 Percent Rule in Theory and Practice.” Law and Policy 10 (1):43-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branton, Regina P. 2009. “The Importance of Race and Ethnicity in Congressional Primary Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 459–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen. 2006. “The Behavior and Success of Latino Legislators: Evidence From the States.” Social Science Quarterly 87 (5): 1136–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, Charles S. III 2010. Redistricting: The Most Political Activity in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?American Political Science Review 90 (4): 794812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, David T. 1999. Race, Redistricting and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Casellas, Jason. 2011. Latino Representation in State Houses and Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Chandler, and Grofman, Bernard, eds. 1994. Quiet Revolution in the South Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Richard L. 2012. “Influence Districts and the Courts: A Concept in Need of Clarity.” In The Most Fundamental Right: Contrasting Perspectives on the Voting Rights Act, ed. McCool, Daniel. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 67–119.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Richard L., and McDonald, Michael D.. 1981. “The Election of Blacks to City Councils: Clarifying the Impact of Electoral Arrangements.” American Political Science Review 75 (2), 344–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 2006. “Trends in Minority Representation, 1974–2000.” In The Future of the Voting Rights Act, eds. Epstein, David, Pildes, Richard, de la Garza, Rodolfo, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 6180.Google Scholar
Fraga, Bernard L. 2016. “Candidates or Districts? Reevaluating the Role of Race in Voter Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1), 97122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 2006. “Operationalizing the Section 5 Retrogression Standard of the Voting Rights Act in the Light of Georgia v. Ashcroft: Social Science Perspectives on Minority Influence, Opportunity and Control.” Election Law Journal 5 (3): 250–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Handley, Lisa. 1989. “Black Representation: Making Sense of Electoral Geography at Different Levels of Government.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14 (2): 265-279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Handley, Lisa, and Lublin, David. 2001. “Drawing Effective Minority Districts: A Conceptual Framework and Some Empirical Evidence.” North Carolina Law Review 79 (5): 1383–430.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan L. 2007. Changing White Attitudes Toward Black Political Leadership. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan L. 2009. “Who Loses in American Democracy? A Count of Votes Demonstrates the Limited Representation of African Americans.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 3757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handley, Lisa, Grofman, Bernard, and Arden, Wayne. 1998. “Electing Minority-Preferred Candidates to Legislative Office.” In Race and Redistricting in the 1990s. ed. Grofman, Bernard. New York: Agathon Press, 1339.Google Scholar
Henderson, John A., Sekhon, Jasjeet S., and Titiunik, Rocío. 2016. “Cause or Effect? Turnout in Hispanic Majority-Minority Districts.” Political Analysis 24 (3): 404–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, William D., Klarner, Carl E., McKee, Seth C., and Smith, Daniel A.. 2018. “Revisiting Majority-Minority Districts and Black Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 7 (2), 408–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juenke, Eric Gonzalez, and Preuhs, Robert R.. 2012. “Irreplaceable Legislators? Rethinking Minority Representatives in the New Century.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 705–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juenke, Eric Gonzalez, and Shah, Paru. 2015. “Not the Usual Story: The Effect of Candidate Supply on Models of Latino Descriptive Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (3): 438–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997a. “The Election of Africans and Latinos to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1972–1994.” American Politics Research 25 (3): 269–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997b. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 2004. The Republican South: Democratization and Partisan Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 2018. “Eight white-majority districts elected black members of Congress this year. That's a breakthrough.” Washington Post. 19 November 2018.Google Scholar
Lublin, David, Brunell, Thomas, Grofman, Bernard, and Handley, Lisa. 2009. “Has the Voting Rights Act Outlived Its Usefulness? In a Word, ‘No’.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (4): 525–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestas, Cherie D., Fulton, Sarah, Maisel, L. Sandy, and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 195208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestas, Cherie D., Maisel, L. Sandy, and Stone, Walter J.. 2005. “National Party Efforts to Recruit State Legislators to Run for the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (2): 277300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschall, Melissa J., Ruhil, Anirudh V. S., and Shah, Paru R.. 2010. “The New Racial Calculus: Electoral Institutions and Black Representation in Local Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnaughy, Corrine M., White, Ismail K., Leal, David L., and Casellas, Jason P.. 2010. “A Latino on the Ballot: Explaining Coethnic Voting Among Latinos and the Response of White Americans.” Journal of Politics 72 (4), 1199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, Seth C. 2010. Republican Ascendancy in Southern U.S. House Elections. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
McKee, Seth C., and Teigen, Jeremy M.. 2009. “Probing the Reds and the Blues: Sectionalism and Voter Location in the 2000 and 2004 U.S. Presidential Elections.” Political Geography 28 (8): 484–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, Seth C., and Springer, Melanie J.. 2015. “A Tale of ‘Two Souths’: White Voting Behavior in Contemporary Southern Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 96 (2): 588607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Frank R. 1990. Black Votes Count. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuhs, Robert R., and Hero, Rodney E.. 2011. “A Different Kind of Representation: Black and Latino Descriptive Representation and the Role of Ideological Cuing.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 157–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuhs, Robert R., and Juenke, Eric Gonzalez. 2011. “Latino US State Legislators in the 1990s: Majority-Minority Districts, Minority Incorporation, and Institutional Position.” State Politics and Policy 11 (1): 4875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Paru. 2014. “It Takes a Black Candidate: A Supply-Side Theory of Minority Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (2): 266–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Paru. 2015. “Stepping Up: Black Political Ambition and Success.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 278–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, Carol M. 1995. Black Faces, Black Interests. Enlarged Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, Abigail. 1987. Whose Votes Count: Affirmative Action and Minority Voting Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whitby, Kenny J. 2007. “The Effect of Black Descriptive Representation on Black Electoral Turnout in the 2004 Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (4), 1010–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitby, Kenny J., and Gilliam, Franklin D. Jr. 1998. “Representation in Congress: Line Drawing and Minorities.” In Great Theatre: The American Congress in the 1990s, eds. Weisberg, Herbert F. and Patterson, Samuel C.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Minority Success in Non-Majority Minority Districts: Finding the “Sweet Spot”
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Minority Success in Non-Majority Minority Districts: Finding the “Sweet Spot”
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Minority Success in Non-Majority Minority Districts: Finding the “Sweet Spot”
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *