Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:28:34.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Institutional Sources of German Monetary Policy Dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Karl Kaltenthaler*
Affiliation:
International Studies, Rhodes College*
*
International StudiesRhodes College2000 North ParkwayMemphis, TN 38 112-1690 email: Kattenthaler@rhodes.edu Fax: (1) 901 843 3371

Abstract

This article seeks to answer the question of why we see continuity in German monetary policy but relative discontinuity in German policy toward European monetary regimes. The paper develops an analytical framework for understanding the factors that account for the dynamics of policy. The article argues that the institutional structure of policy-making is the key factor that accounts for patterns of policy dynamics. The way domestic policy institutions are structured will determine who has a say and when they have a say in policy-making, thus shaping the pattern of policy dynamics. The article shows that the institutions of policy-making are crucial determinants in the dynamics of German monetary and regime policy by the way they offer or block opportunities, at particular points in the policy process, for interested policy actors to achieve the types of policies they want.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 28-September 1, 1996. Thanks are also due to Christopher Anderson, Don Hancock, Arnold Heidenheimer, Jack Knight, Douglass North, Richard Rose, Andy Sobel, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the paper. Any errors that remain are my responsibility. Support for this research came from the P.K. Seidman Fellowship in Political Economy.

References

REFERENCES

Alston, Lee, Eggertsson, Thráinn, and North, Douglass, eds. (1996). Empirical Studies in Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkhausen, Dieter (1992). Gutes Geld & Schlechte Politik: Der Report über die Bundesbank. Düsseldorf: Econ Verlag.Google Scholar
Basler, Hans-Peter (1978). ‘Die wirtschaftspolitischen Zielpräferenzen der Deutschen Bundesbank: Eine empirische Analyse des Notenbankverhaltens fur die Zeit 1958 bis 1974.Kredit und Kapital, 11: 84108.Google Scholar
Baun, Michael (1996). An Imperfect Union: The Maastricht Treaty and the New Politics of European Integration. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Berghahn, Volker (1985). Unternehmer und Politik in der Bundesrepublik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Beyme, Klausvon and Schmidt, Manfred, eds (1990). Politik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blümle, Ernst-Bernd and Schwarz, Peter, eds (1985). Wirtschaftsverbände und Ihre Funktion. Darmstadt: Wissenshaftliche Buchgesselshaft.Google Scholar
Bordes, Christian, Giradin, Eric, and Mélitz, Jacques, eds (1995). European Currency Crises and After. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Braunthal, Gerald (1965). The Federation of German Industry in Politics. Itacha: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Busch, Andreas (1994). ‘The Crisis in the EMS’. Government and Opposition, 29: 8096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Andreas (1995). Preisstabilitätspolitik: Politik und Infiationsraten im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caesar, Rolf (1981). Der Handlungsspielraum von Notenbanken. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Czada, Roland and Schmidt, Manfred (1993). Verhandlungsdemokratie, Interessenvermittlung, Regierbarkeit. Festschrift für Gerhard Lehmbruch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Bundesbank, Deutsche (1989). The Deutsche Bundesbank. Its Monetary Policy Instruments and Functions. Frankfurter: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
Duwendag, Dieter, ed. (1973). Macht und Ohnmacht der Bundesbank. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth (1994). Elusive Union. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Emminger, Otmar (1976). ‘Deutsche Geld- und Währungspolitik im Spannungsfeld zwischen innerem und außerem Gleichgewicht (1948–1975).’ In Deutsche Bundesbank, Währung und Wirlschafl in Deutschland 1876–1975. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
Emminger, Otmar (1986). D-Mark, Dollar, Währungskrisen. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags Anstalt.Google Scholar
Giavazzi, Francesco and Giavannini, Alberto (1989). Limiting Exchange Rate Flexibility. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, John (1991). ‘The Politics of Central Bank Independence.’ Comparative Politics, 23: 329–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, John (1992). Monetary Sovereignty. The Politics of Central Banking in Western Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hartwig, Karl-Hans (1984). ‘Bundesbankautonomie und Inflationsbekämpfung: Politische Ökonomie des Notenbankverhaltens.List Forum, 12: 307322.Google Scholar
Henning, C. Randall (1994). Currencies and Politics in the United States, Germany and Japan. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Rolf (1980). Bundesbankautonomie: Möglichkeiten und Grenzn einer unabhängigen Politik. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Kaltenthaler, Karl (1996). ‘The Restructuring of the German Bundesbank: The Politics of Institutional Change.German Politics and Society, 14: 2348.Google Scholar
Kaltenthaler, Karl (1977). Germany and the Politics of Europe's Money. Durham: North Carolina, Duke University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Hugo (1985). Germany's International Monetary Policy and the European Monetary System. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kenen, Peter (1992). EMU after Maastricht. Washington: Group of Thirty.Google Scholar
Kenen, Peter (1995). Economic and Monetary Union in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Ellen (1991). The Bundesbank. Germany's Central Bank in the International Monetary System. New York: Council of Foreign Relations Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack (1992). Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreile, Michael (1978). ‘West Germany: the Dynamics of Expansion.International Organization, 31:785886.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Phillipe, eds (1982). Patterns of Corporatist Policy-making. London and Beverley Hills, Sage.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne (1994a). ‘Federalism and Central Bank Autonomy: The Politics of German Monetary Policy, 1957–1992.’ Manuscript, UCLA.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne (1994b). ‘Designing a Central Bank in a Federal System: The Deutsche Bundesbank, 1957–1992.’ In Varieties of Monetary Reforms: Lessons and Experiences on the Road to Monetary Union, ed. Siklos, Pierre. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ludlow, Peter (1982). The Making of the European Monetary System. London: Butterworth Scientific.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, David (1992). The Bundesbank: The Bank that Rules Europe. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Markovits, Andrei (1986). The Politics of West German Trade Unions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry (1987). ‘Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3: 243–78.Google Scholar
Neumann, Manfred (1993). ‘Die Deutsche Bundesbank als Modell für eine Europäische Zentralbank?’ in Europa vor dem Eintritt in die Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion, eds Duwendag, Dieter and Siebke, Jürge. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
North, Douglass (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
North, Douglass (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, Rüdiger (1978). Die Unabhängigkeit der Bundesbank. Kronberg/Taunus.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, ed. (1976). The Dynamics of Public Policy: A Comparative Analysis. London and Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz (1987). Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth (1989). ‘Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach.Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1: 131–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeets, Heinz-Dieter (1990). ‘Does Germany Dominate the EMS?Journal of Common Market Studies, 29: 3751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longstreth, Frank, eds (1992). Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang (1985). Industrial Relations in West Germany. Berlin: IIM.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang and Schmitter, Phillipe (1985). Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. London and Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Sturm, Roland (1989). ‘The Role of the Bundesbank in West German Politics.West European Politics, 12: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturm, Roland (1990). ‘Die Politik der Deutschen Bundesbank.’ In Beyme, Klaus von and Schmidt, Manfred (eds) Politik in der Bundesrepublik Deuschland. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George (1990). Nested Games. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vaubel, Roland (1993). ‘Eine Public-Choice Analyse der Deutschen Bundesbank und ihre Implikationen für Europäische Währungsunion.’ In Europa von dem Eintritt in die Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion. Duwendag, Dieter and Siebke, Jürgen (eds). Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Ypersele, Jacques van (1984). The European Monetary System: Origins, Operation, and Outlook. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar