Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:59:56.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fighting Political Terrorism by Refusing Recognition: A Critique of Frey's Proposal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Nehemia Friedland
Affiliation:
PsychologyTel Aviv University

Abstract

Frey (1987) proposed a new information policy designed to lower the utility of terrorist action. The policy is predicated on the assumption that terrorists aim to draw public attention to their cause. Therefore, the terrorists' rewards can be reduced by refraining from attributing a particular terrorist act to any one group. Faced with diminished rewards, terrorists are likely to give up violent action or to resort to tactics that put them in greater jeopardy. The present article offers a thorough analysis of Frey's proposal. It shows that the proposal derives from a too limited view of the terrorist strategy and from unrealistic assumptions about the extent to which democratic governments can control the sources and the dissemination of information. A judgment of Frey's proposal according to criteria drawn from a more comprehensive view of the terrorist strategy leads to the conclusion that the proposed policy is both impractical and counterproductive.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, L. Z. (1983). Terrorism: Problems of the polistraxic. In Freedman, L. Z. and Alexander, Y. (Eds.), Perspectives on terrorism. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. (1987). Fighting political terrorism by refusing recognition. Journal of Public Policy, 7, 179188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, N. (1983). Hostage negotiations: Dilemmas about policy. In Freedman, L. Z. and Alexander, Y. (Eds.), Perspectives on terrorism. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Friedland, N. (1988). Political terrorism: A social psychological perspective. In Stroebe, W., Kruglanski, A. W., Bar-Tal, D. and Hewstone, M. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup conflict. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Fromkin, D. (1975). The strategy of terrorism. Foreign Affairs, 53, 683698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, B. M. (1975). International terrorism: A new mode of conflict. In Carlton, D. and Shaerf, C. (Eds.), International terrorism and world security. London. Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kupperman, R. H. (1977). Facing tomorrow's terrorist incident today. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Kupperman, R. H. (1982). Terror, the strategic tool: Response and control. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 463, 2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marighela, C. (1971). For the liberation of Brazil. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Merari, A., and Friedland, N. (1985). Social psychological aspects of political terrorism. In Oskamp, S. (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 6). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Merari, A., and Friedland, N. (1988). Negotiating with terrorists. In Stroebe, W., Kruglanski, A. W., Bar-Tal, D. and Hewstone, M. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup conflict. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. Z., and Friedland, N. (1986). Theater of terror. Psychology Today, 20, 2028.Google Scholar
Schmid, A. P. (1983). Political terrorism. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, P. (1974). Political terrorism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. (1985). The real-world problems of the terrorist organization and the problem of propaganda. In Merari, A. (Ed.), On terrorism and combating terrorism. Fredrick, Maryland: University Publications of America.Google Scholar