Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-lv2sk Total loading time: 0.285 Render date: 2022-06-29T22:42:54.199Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Farm Interests as Bargaining Chips: France in the EU-Mercosur Free Trade Negotiations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2010

DIETER KONOLD
Affiliation:
Department of Social SciencesHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6Berlin 10099 e-mail: dieter.konold@sowi.hu-berlin.de

Abstract

In trade policy France ranks as one of the most protectionist countries in the European Union. From an outside perspective, the French attitude is usually explained as a consequence of the strength and influence of the agrarian lobby. The article argues that farm groups in France have lost their formerly privileged position and the power to pursue their interests politically. A closer look at domestic politics shows that agricultural reforms were successfully implemented against the opposition of the farm lobby during the last ten years. But at the same time, French policy-makers were keen to create the impression that they were unable to make concessions in international trade talks due to the resistance of the agricultural sector. The EU-Mercosur negotiations demonstrate how the French government fended off demands for liberalization using farm interests as bargaining chips.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahnlid, A. (2005) Setting the Global Agenda: The European Union and the Launch of the Doha Round. In Elgström, O. and Jönsson, C. (eds.), European Union Negotiations: Processes, Networks and Institutions, London: Routledge, 130147.Google Scholar
Balme, R. and Woll, C. (2005) Europe and the Transformation of French Policy-Making: a Cross-Sectoral Approach, Zeitschrift für Staats-und Europawissenschaften 3, 3: 388409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J. (2002) Gaining and Seeking Access: The European Adaption of Domestic Interest Associations, European Journal of Political Research 41, 5: 585612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T. (2010) European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy, Journal of Common Market Studies, 48, 2: 191219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwen, P. (2002) Corporate Lobbying in the European Union: the Logic of Access, Journal of European Public Policy 9, 3: 365390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary, M. C. (1989): Peasants, Politicians and Producers. The Organisation of Agriculture in France since 1918, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, W. D. and Chiasson, C. (2002) State Power, Transformative Capacity and Adapting to Globalization: An Analysis of French Agricultural Policy, 1960–2000, Journal of European Public Policy 9, 2: 168185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, P. D. (1993) Organisational Competition and the Neo-Corporatist Fallacy in French Agriculture, West European Politics 16, 3: 295315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daugbjerg, C. (1998) Policy Networks under Pressure. Pollution Control, Policy Reform and the Power of Farmers, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Daugbjerg, C. and Swinbank, A. (2007) The Politics of CAP Reform: Trade Negotiations, Institutional Settings and Blame Avoidance, Journal of Common Market Studies 45, 1: 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delorme, H. (2004) La politique agricole en France: le compromis des socialistes. In Delorme, H. (ed.), La politique agricole en France: anatomie d'une transition, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 125158.Google Scholar
Diedrichs, U. (2003) Die Politik der Europäischen Union gegenüber dem Mercosur. Die EU als internationaler Akteur, Opladen: Leske+Budrich.Google Scholar
Dür, A. (2008) Bringing Economic Interests Back Into the Study of EU Trade Policy-Making, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10, 1: 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A. and De Bièvre, D. (2007) Inclusion without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy, Journal of Public Policy 27, 1: 79101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A. and Zimmermann, H. (2007) Introduction: The EU in International Trade Negotiations, Journal of Common Market Studies 45, 4: 771787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, S. D. (2007) Access to Protection: Domestic Institutions and Trade Policy in Democracies, International Organization, 61, 3: 571605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgie, R. and Griggs, S. (2000) French Politics. Debates and Controversies, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Epstein, P. J. (1997) Beyond Policy Community: French Agriculture and the GATT, Journal of European Public Policy 4, 3: 355372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, J. (2004) Blueprint for an Interregional Future? The European Union and the Southern Cone. In Aggarwal, V.D. and Fogarty, E.A. (eds), EU Trade Strategies. Between Regionalism and Globalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 4163.Google Scholar
Fischler, F. (2006) Erinnerungen, Wien: Ueberreuter.Google Scholar
Gawande, K., Krishna, P. and Olarreaga, M. (2009) What Governments Maximize and Why: The View from Trade, International Organization, 63, 3: 491532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glavany, J. (2001) Politique folle, Paris: Grasset et Fasquelle.Google Scholar
Grande, E. (1996) The State and Interest Groups in a Framework of Multi-Level Decision-Making: the Case of the European Union, Journal of European Public Policy 3, 3: 318338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, A. (2005) Agricultural Policy in Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, E. (2004) Bringing Politics Back in Rethinking the Role of Economic Interest Groups, Journal of European Public Policy 11, 4: 637654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (2002) Interest Groups and Trade Policy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hennis, M. (2005) Globalization and European Integration. The Changing Role of Farmers in the Common Agricultural Policy, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Iida, K. (1993) When and How do Domestic Constraints Matter? Two-level Games with Uncertainty, Journal of Conflict Resolution 37, 3: 403426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeler, J. (1987) The Politics of Neocorporatism in France. Farmers, the State, and Agricultural Policy-Making in the Fifth Republic, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klom, A. (2003) Mercosur and Brazil: a European Perspective, International Affairs 79, 2: 351368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, G. (2006) Still the Agriculture Knot. In Valladão, A.G.A. and Guerrieri, P. (eds.), EU-Mercosur Relations and the WTO Doha Round. Common Sectorial Interests and Conflicts, Paris: Chaire Mercosur de Sciences Po, 2766.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J.-P. (2005) France and the Doha Debacle. In Overhaus, M., Maull, H.W and Harnisch, S. (eds.), European Trade Policy and the Doha Development Agenda, Trier: German Foreign Policy in Dialogue, 1319.Google Scholar
Mahoney, C. (2007) Lobbying Success in the United States and the European Union', Journal of Public Policy 27, 1: 3556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messerlin, P. A. (1996) France and Trade Policy: Is the ‘French Exception’ Passee?, International Affairs 72, 2: 293309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, S. (2000) The French Exception, Foreign Affairs 79, 4: 104116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, S. (2005) Trading Voices. The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Michalowitz, I. (2007) What Determines Influence? Assessing Conditions for Decision-Making Influence of Interest Groups in the EU, Journal of European Public Policy 14, 1: 132151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, H. V. (1997) Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (2000) De Gaulle between Grain and Grandeur: The Political Economy of French EC Policy 1958–1970, Journal of Cold War Studies 2, 2: 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, P. (1984) Le technocrate et le paysan. Essai sur la politique française de modernisation de l'agriculture de 1945 à nos jours, Paris: Editions Economie et humanisme.Google Scholar
Pappi, F. U. and Henning, C. H. H. A. (1999) The Organization of Influence on the EC's Common Agricultural Policy: A Network Approach, European Journal of Political Research, 36, 2: 257281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, C. (2000) Domestic Interests, Ideas and Integration, Journal of Common Market Studies 38, 1: 4570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1988) Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games, International Organization 42, 3: 427460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roederer-Rynning, C. (2005) France's FNSEA: A Giant on Clay Feet? In Halpin, D. (ed.), Surviving Global Change? Agricultural Interest Groups in Comparative Perspective, Aldershot: Ashgate, 91114.Google Scholar
Roederer-Rynning, C. (2007) Farm Conservatism in France: Revisiting the Weak State Thesis, Journal of European Public Policy 14, 7: 10101127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez Bajo, C. (1999) The EU and Mercosur: A Case of Inter-Regionalism, Third World Quarterly 20, 5: 927941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, A. (2002) Interest Group Influence on Trade Policy in a Multilevel Polity: Analysing the EU Position at the Doha WTO Ministerial Conference, European University Institute: Working Paper RSC 67.Google Scholar
Ventura, D. (2005) Las asimetrías entre el Mercosur y la Unión Europea. Los desafíos de una asociación interregional, Montevideo: KAS.Google Scholar
Woll, C. (2007) Leading the Dance? Power and Political Resources of Business Lobbyists, Journal of Public Policy 27, 1: 5778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolcock, S. (2005) European Union Trade Policy: Domestic Institutions and Systemic Factors. In Kelly, D. and Grant, W. (eds.), The Politics of International Trade in the Twenty-First Century. Actors, Issues and Regional Dynamics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 234251.Google Scholar
Zangl, B. (1999) Interessen auf zwei Ebenen. Internationale Regime in der Agrarhandels-, Währungs-und Walfangpolitik, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Farm Interests as Bargaining Chips: France in the EU-Mercosur Free Trade Negotiations
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Farm Interests as Bargaining Chips: France in the EU-Mercosur Free Trade Negotiations
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Farm Interests as Bargaining Chips: France in the EU-Mercosur Free Trade Negotiations
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *