No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The type species of the eurypterid genus Acutiramus Ruedemann, 1935
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2016
Extract
Current usage as to the name of the type species of the eurypterid genus Acutiramus Ruedemann, 1935, violates Article 68 of the third edition of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Ride et al., 1985; hereafter referred to as the Code). The history is recorded here, and the correct citation of the type species is given as the conclusion of this note. The pertinent sections of the Code are quoted for convenience of the reader.
- Type
- Paleontological Note
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society
References
Clarke, J. M., and Ruedemann, R. 1912. The Eurypterida of New York. New York State Museum Memoir Number 14, Volume 1 (text) p. 1–439, Volume 2 (plates), p. 441-628.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. 1994. Pterygotid eurypterids (Arthropoda, Chelicerata) in the Silurian and Devonian of Bohemia. Journal of the Czech Geological Society, 39:147–162.Google Scholar
Grote, A. R., and Pitt, W. H. 1875. On a new species of Eusarcus and Pterygotus from The Waterlime Group at Buffalo. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, 3:17–20.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1961. The Silurian Eurypterida of the Welsh Borderland. Journal of Paleontology, 35:789–835.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1964. A synopsis of the Family Pterygotidae Clarke and Ruedemann, 1912 (Eurypterida). Journal of Paleontology, 38:331–361.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., and Caster, K. E. 1955. The Pterygotidae of the Silurian Vernon Shales of New York. Journal of Paleontology, 29:1041–1047.Google Scholar
Leutze, W. P., and Heubusch, C. A. 1963. Pterygotus in the Bertie Formation (Silurian) of New York. Journal of Paleontology, 37:1080–1082.Google Scholar
O'Connell, M. 1916. The habitat of the Eurypterida. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, 11, 278 p.Google Scholar
Pohlman, J. 1881. On certain fossils of the Waterlime Group near Buffalo. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, 4:17–22.Google Scholar
Prantl, F., and Přybyl, A. 1948. Revision of the Bohemian Silurian Eurypterida. Rozpravy Státního Geologigického Ústavu Republiky Československé, Svazek 10, 116 p.Google Scholar
Ride, W. D. L., Sabrosky, C. W., Bernardi, G., Melville, R. V., Corliss, J. O., Forest, J., Key, K. H. L., and Wright, C. W. 1985. International Code of zoological Nomenclature (third edition). International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, 338 p.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1935. A review of the eurypterid rami of the genus Pterygotus, with the descriptions of two new Devonian species. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 24, Serial 164, Article 6, p. 69–72.Google Scholar
Schenk, E. T., and McMasters, J. H. 1956. Procedure in taxonomy (3rd edition). Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 119 p.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1934. Merostomata from the Downtonian Sandstone of Ringerike, Norway. Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps Akademi i Oslo I. Matem.-Naturvid, Klasse 1933 Number 10, 125 p.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1955. Merostomata, p. 4–41. In Moore, R. C. (editor), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part P, Arthropoda 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1974. Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany, Part 4: Eurypterida, Drepanopteridae, and other groups. Senckenbergiana lethea, 54:359–451.Google Scholar
Waterston, C. D. 1964. Observations on Pterygotid Eurypterids. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 66:9–33.Google Scholar