Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:02:37.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Redescriptions of some Lower Devonian gastropods from Tennessee currently considered to be platyceratids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2016

John A. Harper*
Affiliation:
Section of Invertebrate Paleontology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA 〈paleoharper12@gmail.com〉

Abstract

Three genera of gastropods described from the Lower Devonian Rockhouse Formation of Hardin County, Tennessee, currently are considered to be junior subjective synonyms of Platyceras (Visitator) Perner, 1911. Evaluation of the type specimens of these genera as well as types of two other gastropods from the same formation reveals the following: Platyostoma quadrangulare (Dunbar, 1920) is the only platyceratid gastropod among them; Saffordella tennessensis Dunbar, 1920 has a selenizone above midwhorl so it is an eotomarioidean belonging to the Gosseletinidae; Aulopea nelsoni Dunbar, 1920 and the lectotype of Distemnostoma princeps Dunbar, 1920 each has a broad subsutural sinus on the upper whorl surface similar to the Omphalotrochidae, as well as a basal sinus similar to certain primitive caenogastropods, so their systematic position is uncertain; I consider Holopea planidorsata Dunbar, 1920 to be a juvenile specimen of D. princeps; the fragmentary paralectotype of D. princeps possibly represents a gerontic form of Distemnostoma curtum Dunbar, 1920, which possesses a well-developed selenizone on an upwardly projecting shoulder at the edge of the upper whorl surface. Because D. curtum appears to be unrelated to D. princeps, the genotype of Distemnostoma, I propose the new generic name Omocordella for D. curtum. The new family Micromphalidae is erected to include Ordovician Slehoferia Rohr and Fryda, 2001, lower Carboniferous Micromphalus Knight, 1945, and Omocordella n. gen.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsden, T.W., 1949, Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Brownsport Formation (Silurian) of western Tennessee: Yale University, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Bulletin 5, 138 p.Google Scholar
Bandel, K., 1979, The nacreous layer in the shell of the gastropod family Seguenziidae and its taxonomic significance: Biomineralisation, v. 10, p. 4961.Google Scholar
Bandel, K., 1991, Schlitzbandschnecken mit perlmutteriger Schale aus den triassischen St. Cassian Schichten der Dolomiten: Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, v. 92, p. 153.Google Scholar
Bandel, K., 2009, The slit bearing nacreous Archaeogastropoda of the Triassic tropical reefs in the St. Cassian Formation with evaluation of the taxonomic value of the selenizone: Berliner Paläobiologische Abhandlungen, v. 10, p. 547.Google Scholar
Batten, R.L., 1956, Some new pleurotomarian gastropods from the Permian of west Texas: Washington Academy of Sciences Journal, v. 46, p. 4243.Google Scholar
Bouchet, P., and Rocroi, J.-P., eds., 2005, Classification and nomenclator of gastropod families: Malacologia, v. 47, 397 p.Google Scholar
Bowsher, A.L., 1955, Origin and adaptation of platyceratid gastropods: University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Mollusca, art. 5, 11 p.Google Scholar
Broadhead, T.W., and McComb, R., 1983, Paedomorphosis in the conodont family Icriodontidae and the evolution of Icriodus: Fossils and Strata, v. 15, p. 149154.Google Scholar
Broadhead, T.W., Capiccioli, D.A., McComb, R., Reid, S.R., and Walker, K.R., 1988, Late Silurian and Early Devonian marine sedimentation near the southern margin of the North American craton, in McMillan, N.J., Embry, A.F., and Glass D.J., eds., Devonian of the World: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Devonian System: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 14, v. 2, p. 197–208.Google Scholar
Conrad, T.A., 1840, Third annual report on the palaeontological department of the survey: New York Geological Survey: Annual Report 4, p. 199207.Google Scholar
Conrad, T.A., 1842, Observations on the Silurian and Devonian systems of the United States, with description of new organic remains: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Journal, v. 8, p. 228280.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G., 1797, Tableau élémentaire de l’histoire naturelle des animaux: Paris, Baudouin, 710 p.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C.O., 1918, Stratigraphy and correlation of the Devonian of western Tennessee: American Journal of Science, series 4, v. 46, p. 732756.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C.O., 1919, Stratigraphy and correlation of the Devonian of western Tennessee: Tennessee State Geological Survey, Bulletin 21, 127 p.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C.O., 1920, New species of Devonian fossils from western Tennessee: Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, v. 23, p. 109158.Google Scholar
Ebbestad, J.O.R., Bassett, M.G., Dastanpour, M., and Popov, L.E., 2008, Ordovician (Caradoc) Gastropoda of the Katkoyeh Formation, Kerman Province, Iran: Geobios, v. 41, p. 605624.Google Scholar
Emmons, E., 1842, Geology of New York, Pt. II, comprising the survey of the second geological district, in Natural History of New York: Albany, W & A White and J. Visscher, 437 p.Google Scholar
Fischer, P., 1885, Manuel de conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologique, ou histoire naturelle des mollusques vivants et fossils: Paris, Librairie F. Savy, v. 8, p. 689784.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1847, Descriptions of organic remains of the lower division of the New York system: Palaeontology of New York, v. 1, 338 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1852, J. Descriptions of the organic remains of the lower middle division of the New York system: Paleontology of New York, v. 2, 362 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1879, Descriptions of the Gastropoda, Pteropoda, and Cephalopoda of the Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage, and Chemung groups: New York Geological Survey, Palaeontology, v. 5, pt. 2, 492 p.Google Scholar
Harris, A.G., Weary, D.J., and Repetski, J.E., 1995, Conodont distribution in uppermost Ordovician through Lower Devonian rocks, DuPont geohydrological survey well, near Waverly, Humphreys County, Tennessee, in Broadhead, T.W., and Gibson, M.A., eds., Upper Silurian-Lower Devonian Biotas and Paleoenvironments of the Western Tennessee Shelf: University of Tennessee, Department of Geological Sciences, Studies in Geology 25, p. 23–27.Google Scholar
Holland, W.J., 1904, Annual report of the Director for the year ending March 31, 1904: Publications of the Carnegie Museum, Serial No. 23, 70 p.Google Scholar
Horný, R., 1992, New Lower Devonian Gastropoda and Tergomya (Mollusca) of Bohemia: Časopis Národniho Muzea, Řada příodovĕdná, v. 159, p. 99119.Google Scholar
Jewell, W.B., 1931, Geology and mineral resources of Hardin County, Tennessee: Tennessee Division of Geology, Bulletin 37, 117 p.Google Scholar
Kano, Y., 2008, Vetigastropod phylogeny and a new concept of Seguenzioidea: Independent evolution of copulatory organs in the deep-sea habitats: Zoologica Scripta, v. 37, p. 121.Google Scholar
Knight, J.B., 1934, The gastropods of the St. Louis, Missouri, Pennsylvanian outlier: VIII. The Turritellidae: Journal of Paleontology, v. 8, p. 433447.Google Scholar
Knight, J.B., 1940, Gastropods of the Whitehorse Sandstone, in Newell, N. D., ed., Invertebrate fauna of the Late Permian Whitehorse Sandstone: Geological Society of America Bulletin v. 51, p. 302–315.Google Scholar
Knight, J.B., 1941, Paleozoic Gastropod Genotypes: Geological Society of America, Special Paper 32, 510 p.Google Scholar
Knight, J.B., 1945, Some new genera of Paleozoic Gastropoda: Journal of Paleontology, v. 19, p. 573587.Google Scholar
Knight, J.B., Cox, L.R., Keen, A.M., Batten, R.L., Yochelson, E.L., and Robertson, R., 1960, Systematic descriptions, in Moore, R.C., and Pitrat, C.W., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. I, Mollusca 1: Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. I169–I331.Google Scholar
Koken, E., 1896, Die Leitfossilien. Ein Handbuch für den Unterricht und für das Bestimmen von Vesteinerungen: Leipzig, Tauchnitz, 848 p.Google Scholar
Meek, F.B., 1864, Descriptions of Carboniferous fossils: California Geological Survey, Paleontology, v. 1, p. 116.Google Scholar
Oehlert, D., and Oehlert, P., 1888, Descriptions de quelques espèces dévoniennes du départment de la Mayenne: Bulletin de la Société d'Études Scientifiques d’Angers, v. 1887, p. 65120.Google Scholar
Peavey, F.N.R., 2013, Review, revision, and paleobiogeography of Ludlow (Silurian) to Lochkovian (Devonian) spathognathodontid conodont taxa [PhD dissertation], Lubbock, Texas Tech University, 121 p.Google Scholar
Perner, J., 1903, Patellidae et Bellerophontidae, in Barrande J., ed., Systême silurien, du centre de la Bohême, parte 1, Researches Paléontologiques, v. 4, Gastéropodes (1): Prague, Charles Bellmann, 164 p.Google Scholar
Perner, J., 1911, Systême silurien du centre de la Bohême, v. 4, Gastéropodes (3): Prague, Charles Bellmann, 390 p.Google Scholar
Petersen, L.E., and Lundin, R.F., 1992, Lower Devonian Ostracoda in western Tennessee: Oklahoma Geological Survey, Bulletin 145, p. 161–171.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.F. Jr., 1983, A revision of the Seguenziacea Verrill 1884 (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). I. Summary and evaluation of the superfamily: Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, v. 96, p. 725757.Google Scholar
Rohr, D.M., and Frýda, J., 2001, A new Ordovician gastropod and operculum from the Czech Republic: Journal of Paleontology, v. 75, p. 461462.Google Scholar
Russell, E.E., Walker, L.G., and Pruitt, G.N., 1975, Field Trip 1: Fossiliferous Silurian, Devonian, and Cretaceous formations in the vicinity of the Tennessee River, in Field Trips in Western Tennessee: Tennessee Division of Geology, Report of Investigations 36, p. 8–13.Google Scholar
Salvini-Plawen, L.V., 1980, A reconsideration of systematics in the Mollusca (phylogeny and higher classification): Malacologia, v. 19, p. 249278.Google Scholar
Sasaki, T., 1998, Comparative anatomy and phylogeny of the Recent Archaeogastropoda (Mollusca: Gastropoda): University of Tokyo, University Museum Bulletin 38, 223 p.Google Scholar
Schlüter, C.A.J., 1894, Über einige neue Fossilien des rheinischen Devon: Verhandlungen des naturhistorischen Vereins der preussischen Rheinlande, Westfalens und des Regierungs-Bezirks Osnabrück, v. 51, p. 6369.Google Scholar
Talent, J.A., and Philip, G.M., 1956, Siluro-Devonian Mollusca from Marble Creek, Thompson River, Victoria: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 68, 5771.Google Scholar
Talent, J.A., Mawson, R., Aitchison, J.C., Becker, R.T., Bell, K.N., Bradshaw, M.A., Burrow, C.J., Cook, A.G., Dargan, G.M., Douglas, J.G., Edgecombe, G.D., Feist, M., Jones, P.J., Long, J.A., Phillips-Ross, J.R., Pickett, J.W., Playford, G., Rickards, R.B., Webby, B.D., Winchester-Seeto, T., Wright, A.J., Young, G.C. and Zhen, Y.Y., 2000, Devonian palaeobiogeography of Australia and adjoining regions, in Wright, A.J., Young, G.C., Talent, J.A., and Laurie, J.R, eds., Palaeobiogeography of Australasian Faunas and Floras. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists Memoir 23, p. 167–257.Google Scholar
Tassell, C.B., 1977, Gastropods from some Early Devonian limestones of the Walhalla synclinorium, central Victoria: National Museum of Victoria, v. 38, p. 231245.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.H., 1970, Morphology and taxonomy of Cyclonema Hall (Gastropoda), Upper Ordovician Cincinnatian Province: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 58, no. 261, p. 219284.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., and Scofield, W.H., 1897, The lower Silurian Gastropoda of Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey, Final Report, v. 3, pt. 2, p. 8131081.Google Scholar
Wagner, P.J., 1996, Contrasting the underlying patterns of active trends in morphological evolution: Evolution, v. 50, p. 9901007.Google Scholar
Wagner, P.J., 1999, The utility of fossil data in phylogenetic analysis: a likelihood example using Ordovician-Silurian species of the Lophospiridae (Gastropoda: Murchisoniina): American Malacological Bulletin, v. 15, p. 131.Google Scholar
Wagner, P.J., 2002, Phylogenetic relationships of the earliest anisostrophically coiled gastropods: Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, v. 88, 152 p.Google Scholar
Wagner, P.J., 2013, Paleozoic gastropod, rostroconch, helcionelloid and tergomyan database: Paleobiology Database, https://testpaleodb.geology.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/bridge.pl?a=displayReference&reference_no=9042Google Scholar
Wagner, P.J., and Erwin, D.H., 2006, Patterns of convergence in general shell form among Paleozoic gastropods: Paleobiology, v. 32, p. 316337.Google Scholar
Wenz, W., 1938, Gastropoda. Allgemeiner Teil und Prosobranchia, in Schindewolf, O.H., ed., Handbuch der Palaozoologie, Volume 6, Part 1, Berlin, Verlag Gebrüder Bornträger, p. 1240.Google Scholar
White, C.A., 1876, Description of new species of fossils from the Paleozoic rocks of Iowa: Proceedings, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 1876, pp. 2734.Google Scholar
White, R.D., Horstman, B.H., McFadden, K.E., and Skorina, L.K., 1999, A type catalog of fossil invertebrates (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Yale Peabody Museum: Yale University, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Postilla, 218, 76 p.Google Scholar
Wilson, C.W. Jr., 1949, Pre-Chattanooga stratigraphy in central Tennessee: Tennessee Division of Geology, Bulletin, v. 56, 347 p.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E.L., 1956, Permian Gastropoda of the southwestern United States, 1. Euomphalacea, Trochonematacea, Pseudophoracea, Anomphalacea, Craspedostomatacea, and Platyceratacea: American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, v. 110, art. 3, p. 173–276.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., 1960, Conodonten aus dem Rheinischen Unterdevon (Gedinnium) des Remscheider Sattels (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge): Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 34, p. 169–201.Google Scholar
Zittel, K.A. von, 1895, Grundzüge der Paläontologie (Paläozoologie), I Abteilung, Invertebrata: München and Leipzig, Oldenburg, 971 p.Google Scholar