Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:59:02.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The naris and palate of Lycaenodon longiceps (Therapsida: Biarmosuchia), by comments on their early evolution in the Therapsida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Christian A. Sidor
Christian A. Sidor*
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, New York College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury NY 11568-8000,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The anatomy of the external naris and anterior palate is described in detail for Lycaenodon longiceps, a morphologically conservative member of the primitive therapsid clade Biarmosuchia. Therapsids are distinguished from pelycosaur-grade synapsids by numerous features of the naris and palate. As in most early therapsids, the septomaxilla in Lycaenodon consists of a short intranarial portion and a long, posterodorsal, facial process. The septomaxillary foramen is reduced to a small, longitudinal slit between the septomaxilla and maxilla. On the palate, the unpaired vomer is clasped anteriorly by long palatal processes of the premaxillae. The choanae are elongate structures whose anterior portion housed the lower canine when the jaws were closed. The palatine and maxilla bear a small shelf (crista choanalis) on their medial surface that has been suggested to represent an early stage in the development of a secondary palate. The parallel acquisition of a crista choanalis and a bony secondary palate in several therapsid groups supports the hypothesis that respiration-related changes were an important aspect of early therapsid evolution.

The genus Lycaenodon may be diagnosed by at least three autapomorphies: the premaxilla bears a scroll-like choanal process that roofs the anterior portion of the internal nares, the vomer is widest at the level of the upper canines with its downturned edges beginning more posteriorly, and the dorsal surface of the postfrontal is convex. Another specimen referred to Lycaenodon preserves additional features that might be autapomorphic, but are not preserved in the holotype.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 77 , Issue 5 , September 2003 , pp. 977 - 984
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Battail, B. 1992. Sur la phylogénie des thérapsides (Reptilia, Therapsida). Annales de Paléontologie, 78:83–124. (In French)Google Scholar
Bennett, A. F., and Ruben, J. A. 1986. The metabolic and thermoregulatory status of therapsids, p. 207–218. In Hotton, N., MacLean, P. D., Roth, J. J., and Roth, E. C. (eds.), The Ecology and Biology of the Mammal-like Reptiles. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Boonstra, L. D. 1934a. Additions to our knowledge of the South African Gorgonopsia, preserved in the British Museum (Natural History). Annals of the South African Museum, 31:175–213.Google Scholar
Boonstra, L. D. 1934b. On an aberrant gorgonopsian, Burnetia mirabilis Broom. South African Journal of Science, 31:462–470.Google Scholar
Boonstra, L. D. 1936. The cranial morphology of some titanosuchid deinocephalians. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 72:99–116.Google Scholar
Boonstra, L. D. 1952. Die gorgonopsiër-geslag, Hipposaurus, en die familie, Ictidorhinidae. Tydskrif vir Wetenskap en Kuns, 12:142–149. (In Afrikaans)Google Scholar
Broili, F., and Schröder, J. 1935. Beobachtungen an Wirbeltieren der Karrooformation. XIII—Über die Skelettreste eines Gorgonopsiers aus den unteren Beaufort-Schichten. Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung:279–330. (In German)Google Scholar
Broom, R. 1905. On the use of the term Anomodontia. Records of the Albany Museum, 1:266–269.Google Scholar
Broom, R. 1925. On some carnivorous therapsids. Records of the Albany Museum, 25:309–326.Google Scholar
Broom, R. 1930. On the structure of the mammal-like reptiles of the sub-order Gorgonopsia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 218:345–371.Google Scholar
Broom, R. 1932. The mammal-like reptiles of South Africa and the origin of mammals. Witherby, London, 376 p.Google Scholar
Broom, R. 1940. Some new Karroo reptiles from the Graaff-Reinet District. Annals of the Transvaal Museum, 20:71–87.Google Scholar
Cluver, M. A., and King, G. M. 1983. A reassessment of the relationships of the Permian Dicynodontia (Reptilia, Therapsida) and a new classification of dicynodonts. Annals of the South African Museum, 91:195–273.Google Scholar
Fourie, S. 1974. The cranial morphology of Thrinaxodon liorhinus-Seeley. Annals of the South African Museum, 65:337–400.Google Scholar
Hillenius, W. J. 2000. Septomaxilla of nonmammalian synapsids: soft-tissue correlates and a new functional interpretation. Journal of Morphology, 245:29–50.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopson, J. A. 1987. The mammal-like reptiles: a study of transitional fossils. The American Biology Teacher, 49:16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopson, J. A. 1991. Systematics of the nonmammalian Synapsida and implications for patterns of evolution in synapsids, p. 635–693. In Schultze, H.-P. and Trueb, L. (eds.), Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods: Controversy and Consensus. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Hopson, J. A. 1994. Synapsid evolution and the radiation of non-eutherian mammals, p. 190–219. In Prothero, D. B. and Schoch, R. M. (eds.), Major Features of Vertebrate Evolution. Short Courses in Paleontology 7. Paleontological Society, Knoxville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Hopson, J. A., and Barghusen, H. 1986. An analysis of therapsid relationships, p. 83–106. In Hotton, N., MacLean, P. D., Roth, J. J., and Roth, E. C. (eds.), The Ecology and Biology of the Mammal-like Reptiles. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Ivachnenko, M. F. 1996. Primitive anomodonts, venyukoviids, from the Late Permian of Eastern Europe. Paleontological Journal, 30:575–582.Google Scholar
Ivachnenko, M. F. 2000. Estemmenosuches and primitive theriodonts from the Late Permian. Paleontological Journal, 34:184–192.Google Scholar
Kemp, T. S. 1979. The primitive cynodont Procynosuchus: functional anatomy of the skull and relationships. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 285:73–122.Google Scholar
Laurin, M. 1993. Anatomy and relationships of Haptodus garnettensis, a Pennsylvanian synapsid from Kansas. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 13:200–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurin, M., and Reisz, R. R. 1996. The osteology and relationships of Tetraceratops insignis, the oldest known therapsid. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16:95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, W., van den Heever, J., and Durand, F. 1996. New therapsid specimens and the origin of the secondary hard and soft palate of mammals. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 34:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendrez, C. 1972. Premières ébauches d'un palais secondaire osseux chez les Reptiles mammaliens. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences à Paris D, 274:2920–2961. (In French)Google Scholar
Mendrez-Carroll, C. 1975. Comparison du palais chez les Thérocé-phales primitifs, les Gorgonopsiens et les Ictidorhinidae. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences à Paris D, 280:17–20. (In French)Google Scholar
Olson, E. C. 1937. The cranial morphology of a new gorgonopsian. Journal of Geology, 45:511–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlov, Y. A. 1958. Khishchnye deinotsefaly fauny Isheeva (Titanozukhi) (The carnivorous dinocephalians of the Isheevo fauna [titanosuchians]). Akademiya Nauk SSSR Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta (Transactions of the Paleontological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR), 72:1–114. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R., and Berman, D. S. 2001. The skull of Mesenosaurus romeri, a small varanopseid (Synapsida: Eupelycosauria) from the Upper Permian of the Mesen River Basin, northern Russia. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 70:113–132.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S., and Price, L. I. 1940. Review of the Pelycosauria. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 28:1–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubidge, B. S., and Hopson, J. A. 1996. A primitive anomodont therapsid from the base of the Beaufort Group (Upper Permian) of South Africa. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 117:117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubidge, B. S., and Kitching, J. W. 2003. A new burnetiamorph (Therapsida: Biarmosuchia) from the lower Beaufort of South Africa. Palaeontology, 46:119–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubidge, B. S., and Sidor, C. A. 2001. Evolutionary patterns among Permo-Triassic therapsids. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32:449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubidge, B. S., and Sidor, C. A. 2002. On the cranial morphology of the basal therapsids Burnetia and Proburnetia (Therapsida: Burneti-idae). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 22:257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidor, C. A. 2000. Evolutionary trends and relationships within the Synapsida. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, 370 p.Google Scholar
Sidor, C. A., and Hopson, J. A. 1998. Ghost lineages and “mammalness”: assessing the temporal pattern of character acquisition in the Synapsida. Paleobiology, 24:254–273.Google Scholar
Sidor, C. A., and Rubidge, B. S. In press. A new biarmosuchian (Therapsida: Biarmosuchia) from the lower Beaufort Group of South Africa. In Gaudin, T., Wible, J., Carrano, M., and Blob, R. (eds.), Amniote Paleobiology: University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sidor, C. A., and Welman, J. In press. A second specimen of Lemurosaurus pricei (Therapsida: Burnetiamorpha). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigogneau, D. 1970. Révision systématique des gorgonopsiens Sud-Af-ricains. Cahiers de Paléontologie, Paris, 414 p. (In French)Google Scholar
Sigogneau, D., and Tchudinov, P. K. 1972. Reflections on some Russian eotheriodonts (Reptilia, Synapsida, Therapsida). Palaeovertebrata, 5:79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigogneau-Russell, D. 1989. Theriodontia I, p. 1–127. In Wellnhofer, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology, Pt. 17B. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Smith, R. M. H., and Keyser, A. W. 1995. Biostratigraphy of the Cistecephalus Assemblage Zone, p. 23–28. In Rubidge, B. S. (ed.), Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). Biostratigraphic Series 1. Council for Geosciences, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Tatarinov, L. P. 1968. Novye teriodonty iz verknei permi SSSR (New theriodonts from the Upper Permian of the USSR), p. 32–46. Verkhnepaleozoiskie i mezozoiskie zemnovodyne i presmykayushchiesya SSSR (Upper Paleozoic and Mesozoic Amphibians and Reptiles of the USSR). Nauka, Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1960. Therapsids as mammals. Evolution, 14:304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wible, J. R., Miao, D., and Hopson, J. A. 1990. The septomaxilla of fossil and Recent synapsids and the problem of the septomaxilla of monotremes and armadillos. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 98:203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar