Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:47:50.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crushing strength of Puriana pacifica (Ostracoda), an experimental approach to taphonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Roger L. Kaesler ,
Mervin Kontrovitz  and
Stefanie Taunton
Roger L. Kaesler
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, 120 Lindley Hall, The University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045-2124 2Department of Museum of Invertebrate Paleontology, and Paleontological Institute, 120 Lindley Hall, The University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045-2124
Mervin Kontrovitz
Affiliation:
3Department of Geosciences, Northeast Louisiana University, Monroe 71209
Stefanie Taunton
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, 120 Lindley Hall, The University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045-2124
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Specimens of the ostracode species Puriana pacifica Benson, 1959, from a modern assemblage from the Gulf of California can be sorted by visual inspection into five groups based on taphonomic condition. Characteristics used for sorting include: presence or absence of appendages; color and opacity of the valves; and evidence of abrasion, fragmentation, and boring. As measured by resistance to crushing force, members of the five groups show appreciable, progressive, postmortem weakening so that specimens in the poorest apparent condition are the weakest mechanically. The groups also differ in style of fracturing in response to crushing force. Fractures of valves of the freshest specimens are located quite consistently. Among specimens with progressively more damage, the location of fractures becomes less predictable. On valves of the most damaged specimens, typical fractures are short and likely to occur almost anywhere on the valve. These experimental results emphasize the importance of rapid burial in enhancing the likelihood of fossilization. Furthermore, they cast doubt on the ability of paleoecologists to use valves and carapaces of fossil ostracodes to interpret levels of wave and current energy in ancient environments because taphonomic weakening and subsequent destruction may effectively mask functional morphology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 6 , November 1993 , pp. 1005 - 1010
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, R. H. 1959. Ecology of recent ostracodes of the Todos Santos Bay region, Baja California, Mexico. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Arthropoda, Article 1:1–80.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1970. Architectural solution to structural stress in rigid microorganisms, through SEM examination, p. 71–77. In Proceedings, Third Annual Stereoscan Colloquium. Kent Cambridge Scientific, Morton Grove, Illinois.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1974. The role of ornamentation in the design and function of the ostracode carapace, p. 47–57. In Geoscience and Man. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1975. Morphologic stability in Ostracoda, p. 13–46. In Swain, F. M. (ed.), Biology and Paleobiology of Ostracoda. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 65.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H. 1981. Form, function, and architecture of ostracode shells. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science, 9:59–80.Google Scholar
Benson, R. H., and Kaesler, R. L. 1963. Recent marine and lagoonal ostracodes from the Estero de Tastiota region, Sonora, Mexico (northeastern Gulf of California). The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Arthropoda, Article 3:1–34.Google Scholar
Cadot, H. M. Jr., and Kaesler, R. L. 1977. Magnesium content of calcite in carapaces of benthic marine Ostracoda. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 87:1–23.Google Scholar
Flessa, K. W. (ed.). 1987. Paleoecology and taphonomy of recent to Pleistocene intertidal deposits, Gulf of California. Paleontological Society Special Publication 2, 237 p.Google Scholar
Izuka, S. K., and Kaesler, R. L. 1986. Biostratinomy of ostracode assemblages from a small reef flat in Maunalua Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. Journal of Paleontology, 60:347–360.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L., and Kontrovitz, M. 1989. Taphonomy of subfossil, intertidal Ostracoda: experimental approach. Abstracts, 28th International Geological Congress, 2:144.Google Scholar
Kontrovitz, M. 1967. An investigation of ostracode preservation. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences, 29:171–177.Google Scholar
Kontrovitz, M. 1988. Crushing strength of ostracode shells: an aspect of taphonomy. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 19:731–732.Google Scholar
Kornicker, L. S., and Sohn, I. G. 1970. Viability of ostracode eggs egested by fish and effect of digestive fluids on ostracode shells—ecologic and paleoecologic implications, p. 125–135. In Oertli, H. J. (ed.), Paléoécologie des Ostracodes. Bulletin Centre de Recherches Pau—SNPA, 5 (supplement).Google Scholar
Maddocks, R. F. 1988. One hundred million years of predation on ostracods: the fossil record in Texas, p. 637–657. In Hanai, T., Ikeya, N., and Ishizaki, K. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology of Ostracoda. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G., Roe, A., and Lewontin, R. C. 1960. Quantitative Zoology. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, 440 p.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edition. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 859 p.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1970. Relation of shell form to life habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Society of America Memoir 125, 296 p.Google Scholar
Swain, F. M. 1967. Ostracoda from the Gulf of California. Geological Society of America Memoir 101, 139 p.Google Scholar
Taunton, S., and Kaesler, R. L. 1991. Experimental taphonomy of the Ostracoda: tumbling and transportation of Cyprideis beaconensis (LeRoy, 1943). Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 23(5):A344–A345.Google Scholar
Whatley, R. C., Trier, K., and Dingwall, P. M. 1982. Some preliminary observations on certain mechanical and biophysical properties of the ostracod carapace, p. 76–104. In Bate, R. H., Robinson, E., and Sheppard, L. M. (eds.), Fossil and Recent Ostracods. British Micropaleontological Society, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.Google Scholar