Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T01:38:50.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The color pattern on a Cretaceous nautiloid from South Dakota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Royal H. Mapes
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens 45701
Timothy S. Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260

Extract

Preservation of relict color patterns on fossil nautiloid cephalopods is a relatively rare phenomenon. Reports of this phenomenon as summarized by Kobluck and Mapes (1989, table 2) for the Paleozoic indicate that perhaps as many as 32 genera with coiled, orthoconic, and cyrtoconic conchs have been described with relict color patterns. However, reports of Mesozoic occurrences are limited to only Ophionautilus? in the Jurassic (Shimanski, 1962) and Eutrephoceras in the Cretaceous (Shimanski, 1962; Landman, 1982). Cenozoic reports are limited to Aturia in the Tertiary (Foerste, 1930; Shimanski, 1962; Teichert, 1964) and modern Nautilus (see Saunders and Landman, 1987, for an extensive treatment). The reports on both Mesozoic occurrences are limited to description of external conch morphology, detailed appearance of the color patterns, and the relationship of the remnant color pattern to the conch morphology. Indeed, the specimen discussed herein was originally illustrated by Landman (1982, fig. 8), with a caption indicating the presence of possible color banding. Analysis of this Cretaceous specimen allows comparison to Nautilus and provides a suggestion as to the evolution of certain mature color patterns in coiled cephalopods from the late Mesozoic to Recent.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collins, D. H., Westermann, G. E. G., and Ward, P. D. 1978. The mature Nautilus: its shell and buoyancy. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Program, 10:382.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1930. The color patterns of fossil cephalopods and brachiopods, with notes on gastropods and pelecypods. Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan Contributions, 3:109150.Google Scholar
Kobluck, D. R., and Mapes, R. H. 1989. The fossil record, function and possible origins of shell color patterns in Paleozoic marine invertebrates. Palaios, 4:6385.Google Scholar
Landman, N. H. 1982. In pursuit of the pearly nautilus. Discovery, 16:1119.Google Scholar
Mapes, R. H., and Sneck, D. A. 1987. The oldest ammonoid ‘color’ patterns: description, comparison with Nautilus, and implications. Palaeontology, 30:299309.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B., and Landman, N. H. (eds.). 1987. Nautilus: The Biology and Paleobiology of a Living Fossil. Plenum Press, New York and London, 632 p.Google Scholar
Shimanski, V. N. 1962. Superorder Nautiloidea, General Section, p. 3371. In Orlov, Y. A. (ed.), Fundamentals of Paleontology, Mollusca-Cephalopoda, Volume 5 (Translation Israel Binational Science Foundation, 1974).Google Scholar
Teichert, C. 1964. Morphology of hard parts, p. K13K53. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part K, Mollusca 3. The Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Teichert, C., and Matsumoto, D. T. 1987. The ancestry of the genus Nautilus , p. 2532. In Saunders, W. B. and Landman, N. H. (eds.), Nautilus: The Biology and Paleobiology of a Living Fossil. Plenum Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
Woodruff, D. S., Carpenter, M. P., Saunders, W. B., and Ward, P. D. 1987. Genetic variation and phylogeny in Nautilus , p. 6583. In Saunders, W. B. and Landman, N. H. (eds.), Nautilus: The Biology and Paleobiology of a Living Fossil. Plenum Press, New York and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar