Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:01:17.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anatomy, systematics, paleoenvironment, growth, and age of the sauropod dinosaur Sonorasaurus thompsoni from the Cretaceous of Arizona, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2016

Michael D. D’Emic ,
Brady Z. Foreman  and
Nathan A. Jud
Michael D. D’Emic
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530-0701, USA 〈mdemic@adelphi.edu〉
Brady Z. Foreman
Affiliation:
Western Washington University, Department of Geology, Bellingham, WA 98225-9080, USA 〈brady.foreman@wwu.edu〉
Nathan A. Jud
Affiliation:
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 〈najud@flmnh.ufl.edu〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sauropod dinosaurs are rare in the Cretaceous North American fossil record in general and are absent from that record for most of the Late Cretaceous. Sonorasaurus thompsoni from the Turney Ranch Formation of the Bisbee Group of Arizona, USA, potentially represents one of the youngest sauropods before their ca. 30-million-year-long hiatus from the record. The anatomy of Sonorasaurus has only been briefly described, its taxonomic validity has been questioned, several hypotheses have been proposed regarding its phylogenetic relationships, and its life history, geologic age, and reported paleoenvironment are ambiguous.

Herein we assess the systematics, paleoenvironment, life history, and geologic age of Sonorasaurus based on firsthand observation, bone histology, and fieldwork in the holotypic quarry and environs. The validity of S. thompsoni is substantiated by autapomorphies. Cladistic analysis firmly places it within the Brachiosauridae, in contrast to results of some recent analyses. Bone histology suggests that the only known exemplar of Sonorasaurus grew slowly and sporadically compared to other sauropods and was approaching its adult size. In contrast with previous assessments of a coastal/estuarine paleoenvironment for the Turney Ranch Formation, our sedimentological and plant macrofossil data indicate that Sonorasaurus lived in a semiarid, low relief evergreen woodland that received highly variable (perhaps seasonal) precipitation. We obtained detrital zircons from the holotypic quarry for U-Pb dating, which only yielded Barremian-aged and older grains, whereas other radiometric and biostratigraphic data suggest that the sediments at the quarry were deposited near the Albian-Cenomanian boundary.

Sonorasaurus is taxonomically valid, represents one of the geologically youngest brachiosaurid sauropods, and inhabited a harsh inland evergreen-dominated woodland environment that limited its growth. A review of other Bisbee Group dinosaurs suggests that its fauna, although poorly sampled, exhibits broad similarity to those from coeval North American horizons, reinforcing the apparent faunal homogeneity at the time.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 102 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, H.N., and Kern, E.M., 1947, The Idaho Tempskyas and associated fossil plants: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, v. 34, p. 119–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, L.E., 1982, Stratigraphy and sedimentology of the Bisbee Group in the Whetstone Mountains, Pima and Cochise Counties, Southeastern Arizona: Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Arizona, 208 pp.Google Scholar
Archibald, L.E., 1987, Stratigraphy and sedimentology of the Bisbee Group in the Whetstone Mountains, southeastern Arizona: Arizona Geological Society Digest, v. 18, p. 273–282.Google Scholar
Axsmith, B.J., and Jacobs, B.F., 2005, The conifer Frenelopsis ramosissima (Cheirolepidiaceae) in the Lower Cretaceous of Texas: systematic, biogeographical, and paleoecological implications: International Journal of Plant Sciences, v. 166, p. 327–337.Google Scholar
Bailey, I.W., 1924, The problem of identifying the wood of Cretaceous and later dicotyledons: Paraphyllanthoxylon arizonense: Annals of Botany, v. 38, p. 439–451.Google Scholar
Bennett, S.C., 2013, The phylogenetic position of the Pterosauria within the Archosauromorpha re–examined: Historical Biology, v. 25, p. 545–563.Google Scholar
Benson, R.B.J., Campione, N.E., Carrano, M.T., Mannion, P.D., Sullivan, C., Upchurch, P., and Evans, D.C., 2014, Rates of dinosaur body mass evolution indicate 170 million years of sustained ecological innovation on the avian stem lineage: PLoS Biology, v. 12, p. e1001853.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, J.F., González Riga, B.J., and Apesteguía, S., 2006, Ligabuesaurus leanzai gen. et sp. nov. (Dinosauria, Sauropoda), a new titanosaur from the Lohan Cura Formation (Aptian, Lower Cretaceous) of Neuquén, Patagonia, Argentina: Cretaceous Research, v. 27, p. 364–376.Google Scholar
Borsuk-Bialynicka, M., 1977, A new camarasaurid sauropod Opisthocoelicaudia skarzynskii gen. n., sp. n. from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia: Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 37, p. 5–63.Google Scholar
Canudo, J.I., R. Royo-Torres, R., and Cuenca-Bescós, G., 2008, A new sauropod: Tastavinsaurus sanzi gen. et sp. nov. from the Early Cretaceous (Aptian) of Spain: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 28, p. 712–731.Google Scholar
Carballido, J.L., and Sander, P.M., 2014, Postcranial axial skeleton of Europasaurus holgeri (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Upper Jurassic of Germany: implications for sauropod ontogeny and phylogenetic relationships of basal Macronaria: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 12, p. 335–387.Google Scholar
Carrano, M.T., 2005, The evolution of sauropod locomotion: morphological diversity of a secondarily quadrupedal radiation, in Curry Rogers, K.A., and Wilson, J.A., eds., The Sauropods: Evolution and Paleobiology, Berkeley, University of California Press, p. 229–251.Google Scholar
Cerling, T.E., 1984, The stable isotopic composition of modern soil carbonate and its relationship to climate: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 71, p. 229–240.Google Scholar
Cerling, T.E., and Quade, J., 1993, Stable carbon and oxygen isotopes in soil carbonates, in Swart, P.K., Lohmann, K.C., McKenzie, J., and Savin, S., eds., Climate Change in Continental Isotopic Records: Geophysical Monograph 78, Washington DC, American Geophysical Union, p. 217–231.Google Scholar
Cifelli, R., Kirkland, J.I., Weil, A., Deino, A., and Kowallis, B.J., 1997, High-precision 40Ar-39Ar geochronology and the advent of North America’s Late Cretaceous terrestrial fauna: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 94, p. 11163–11167.Google Scholar
Cubo, J., Le Roy, N., Martinez-Maza, C., and Montes, L., 2012, Paleohistological estimation of bone growth rate in extinct archosaurs: Paleobiology, v. 38, p. 335–349.Google Scholar
Curtice, B.D., 2000, The axial skeleton of Sonorasaurus thompsoni Ratkevitch 1998: Proceedings of the Southwest Paleontological Symposium, Mesa, Arizona, v. 7, p. 83–87.Google Scholar
D’Emic, M.D., 2012, The early evolution of titanosauriform sauropod dinosaurs: Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 166, p. 624–671.Google Scholar
D’Emic, M.D., 2013, Revision of the sauropod dinosaurs of the Lower Cretaceous Trinity Group, southern USA, with the description of a new genus: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 11, p. 707–726.Google Scholar
D’Emic, M.D., and Foster, J.F., in press, The oldest Cretaceous North American sauropod dinosaur: Historical Biology http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2014.976817.Google Scholar
D’Emic, M.D., and Foreman, B.Z., 2012, The beginning of the sauropod dinosaur hiatus in North America: insights from the Lower Cretaceous Cloverly Formation of Wyoming: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 32, p. 883–902.Google Scholar
D’Emic, M.D., Williamson, T.E., and Wilson, J.A., 2011, A sauropod dinosaur pes from the latest Cretaceous of North America and the validity of Alamosaurus sanjuanensis (Sauropoda, Titanosauria): Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 31, p. 1072–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Emic, M.D., Mannion, P.D., Upchurch, P., Benson, R.B.J., Pang, Q., and Cheng, Z., 2013, Osteology of Huabeisaurus allocotus (Sauropoda: Titanosauriformes) from the Upper Cretaceous of China: PLoS ONE, v. 8, p. e69375.Google Scholar
Dickinson, W.R., Fiorillo, A.R., Hall, D.L., Monreal, R., Potochnik, A.R., and Swift, P.N., 1989, Cretaceous Strata of Southern Arizona, in Reynolds, J.P., and Jenny, S.J.. Geologic Evolution of Arizona: Arizona Geological Society Digest, v. 17, p. 447–461.Google Scholar
Dickinson, W.R., Lawton, T.F., and Gehrels, G.E., 2009, Recycling detrital zircons: a case study from the Cretaceous Bisbee Group of southern Arizona: Geology, v. 37, p. 503–506.Google Scholar
Falcon-Lang, H.J., 2003, Growth interruptions in silicified conifer woods from the Upper Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation, Montana, USA: implications for palaeoclimate and dinosaur palaeoecology: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 199, p. 299–314.Google Scholar
Farquhar, G.D., Ehleringer, J.R., and Hubick, K.T., 1989, Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis: Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, v. 40, p. 503–538.Google Scholar
Fielding, C.R., 2006, Upper flow regime sheets, lenses and scour fills: Extending the range of architectural elements for fluvial sediment bodies: Sedimentary Geology, v. 190, p. 227–240.Google Scholar
Foreman, B.Z., Fricke, H.C., Lohmann, K.C., and Rogers, R.R., 2011, Reconstructing paleocatchments by integrating stable isotope records, sedimentology, and taphonomy: A Late Cretaceous case study (Montana, United States): PALAIOS, v. 26, p. 545–554.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E.S., and Jenkins, F.A., 2010, The cranial morphology of Kayentachelys, an Early Jurassic cryptodire, and the early history of turtles: Acta Zoologica, v. 91, p. 335–368.Google Scholar
Galton, P.M., and Jensen, J.A., 1979, Hypsilophodon and Iguanodon from the Lower Cretaceous of North America: Nature, v. 257, p. 668–669.Google Scholar
Gehrels, G., 2012, Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology: current methods and new opportunities, in Busby, C., and Azor, A., eds., Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins: Recent Advances, London, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, p. 47–62.Google Scholar
Gehrels, G., and Dickinson, W.R., 2009, Use of U-Pb ages of detrital zircons to infer maximum depositional ages of strata: A test against a Colorado Plateau Mesozoic database: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 288, p. 115–125.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P.D., Franzen, J.L., Habersetzer, J., Hurum, J.H., and Smith, B.H., 2010, Darwinius masillae is a Haplorhine -Reply to Williams et al. (2010): Journal of Human Evolution, v. 59, p. 574–579.Google Scholar
González-León, C.M., Scott, R.W., Löser, H., Lawton, T.F., Robert, E., and Valencia, V.A., 2008, Upper Aptian-Lower Albian Mural Formation: stratigraphy, biostratigraphy and depositional cycles on the Sonoran shelf, northern México: Cretaceous Research, v. 29, p. 249–266.Google Scholar
Gomani, E.M., 2005, Sauropod dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous of Malawi, Africa: Paleontologica Electronica, v. 8, p. 1–37.Google Scholar
Hasiotis, S.T., 2002, Continental Trace Fossils: SEPM Short Course Notes, v. 51, 132 pp.Google Scholar
Hendrickx, C., Mateus, O., and Araújo, R., 2015, The dentition of megalosaurid theropods: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 60, p. 627–642.Google Scholar
Hill, R., and Ratkevitch, R., 1996, A microscopic look at the Sonorasaurus site, Cochise County, Arizona: Southwest Paleontological Symposium, Mesa, Arizona, v. 4.Google Scholar
Hodnett, J.-P., 2003, A preliminary review of the vertebrate fauna of the Turney Ranch Formation (Albian/Cenomanian) of Pima County, Arizona: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23 (supplement to 3), 61A.Google Scholar
IAWA Committee, 2004, IAWA list of microscopic features for softwood identification, IAWA Journal, v. 25, p. 1–70.Google Scholar
Inman, K.F., 1987, Depositional environments and sandstone petrography of Cretaceous sedimentary rocks, Adobe Canyon, Santa Rita Mountains, southeastern Arizona: Arizona Geological Society Digest, v. 18, p. 301–314.Google Scholar
Janensch, W., 1950, Die Wirbelsäule von Brachiosaurus brancai: Palaeontographica, (Suppl 7), v. 3, p. 27–93.Google Scholar
Janensch, W., 1961, Die gliedmaßen und gliedmaßen gürtel der sauropoden der Tendaguru–Schichten: Palaeontographica, (Suppl. 7), v. 3, p. 177–235.Google Scholar
Joyce, W.G., and Sterli, J., 2012, Congruence, non-homology, and the phylogeny of basal turtles: Acta Zoologica, v. 93, p. 149–159.Google Scholar
Klein, N., and Sander, P.M., 2008, Ontogenetic stages in the long bone histology of sauropod dinosaurs: Paleobiology, v. 34, p. 247–263.Google Scholar
Koch, P.L., 1998, Isotopic reconstruction of past continental environments: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science, v. 26, p. 573–613.Google Scholar
Lucas, S.G., and Heckert, A.B., 2005, Distribution, age, and correlation of Cretaceous fossil vertebrates from Arizona, in Heckert, A.B., and Lucas, S.G., eds., Vertebrate Paleontology in Arizona: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, v. 29, p. 105–110.Google Scholar
Mannion, P.D., and Upchurch, P., 2011, A re–evaluation of the ‘mid-Cretaceous sauropod hiatus’ and the impact of uneven sampling of the fossil record on patterns of regional dinosaur extinction: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 299, p. 529–540.Google Scholar
Mannion, P.D., Upchurch, P., Barnes, R., and Mateus, O., 2013, Osteology of the Late Jurassic Portuguese sauropod dinosaur Lusotitan atalaiensis (Macronaria) and the evolutionary history of basal titanosauriforms: Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 168, p. 98–206.Google Scholar
Marpmann, J.S., Carballido, J.L., Sander, P.M., and Knötschke, N., 2015, Cranial anatomy of the Late Jurassic dwarf sauropod Europasaurus holgeri (Dinosauria, Camarasauromorpha): ontogenetic changes and size dimorphism: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 13, p. 221–263.Google Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1878, Principal characters of American Jurassic dinosaurs, part I: American Journal of Sciences, v. 16, p. 411–416.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W.D., and Cifelli, R.L., 2000, Last evidence of sauropod dinosaurs (Saurischia: Sauropodomorpha) in the North American mid-Cretaceous: Brigham Young University Geology Studies, v. 45, p. 19–24.Google Scholar
McCord, R.D., and Gillette, D., 2005, Cretaceous Vertebrates of Arizona: Mesa Southwest Museum Bulletin, v. 11, p. 94–103.Google Scholar
McIntosh, J.S., Coombs, W.P. Jr., and Russell, D.A., 1992, A new diplodocid sauropod (Dinosauria) from Wyoming, USA: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 12, p. 158–167.Google Scholar
Miller, H.W., 1964, Cretaceous dinosaurian remains from southern Arizona: Journal of Paleontology, v. 38, p. 378–384.Google Scholar
Mohrig, D., Heller, P.L., Paola, C., and Lyons, W.J., 2000, Interpreting avulsion process from ancient alluvial sequences: Guadalope-Matarranya system (northern Spain) and Wasatch Formation (western Colorado): Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 112, p. 1787–1803.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, S.J., 2011, The early evolution of archosaurs: relationships and the origin of major clades: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 352, p. 1–292.Google Scholar
Niklas, K.J., 1994, Predicting the height of fossil plant remains: An allometric approach to an old problem. American Journal of Botany v. 81, p. 1235–1242.Google Scholar
Osborn, H.F., and Mook, C.C., 1921, Camarasaurus, Amphicoelias, and other sauropods of Cope: Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History New Series, v. 3, p. 247–387.Google Scholar
Ostrom, J.H., and McIntosh, J.S., 1966, Marsh’s Dinosaurs, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Peralta-Medina, E., and Falcon-Lang, H.J., 2012, Cretaceous forest composition and productivity inferred from a global fossil wood database: Geology, v. 40, p. 219–222.Google Scholar
Philippe, M., and Bamford, M.K., 2008, A key to morphogenera used for Mesozoic conifer-like woods: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 148, p. 184–207.Google Scholar
Rasband, W.S., 1997, ImageJ. U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Available at: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.Google Scholar
Ratkevitch, R., 1997a, Dinosaur remains of southern Arizona, Dinofest International, Arizona State University, p. 213–221.Google Scholar
Ratkevitch, R., 1997b, Sonorasaurus: dinosaur of the desert: Arizona Sonora Desert Museum, 17 p.Google Scholar
Ratkevitch, R., 1998, New Cretaceous brachiosaurid dinosaur, Sonorasaurus thompsoni gen. et sp. nov, from Arizona: Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science, v. 31, p. 71–82.Google Scholar
Riggs, E.S., 1903, Structure and relationships of opisthocoelian dinosaurs, part I: Apatosaurus Marsh: Field Columbian Museum Geological Series, v. 2, p. 165–196.Google Scholar
Royo-Torres, R., 2009, El saurópodo de Peñarroya de Tastavins. Instituto de Estudios Turolenses-Fundación Conjunto Paleontológico de Teruel-Dinópolis: Monografías Turolenses, v. 6, p. 1–548.Google Scholar
Salgado, L.S., Apesteguía, S., and Heredia, S.E., 2005, A new specimen of Neuquensaurus australis, a Late Cretaceous saltasaurine titanosaur from north Patagonia: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 25, p. 623–634.Google Scholar
Salgado, L., Coria, R.A., and Calvo, J.O., 1997, Evolution of titanosaurid sauropods, I: phylogenetic analysis based on the postcranial evidence: Ameghiniana, v. 34, p. 3–32.Google Scholar
Sander, P.M., 2000, Long bone histology of the Tendaguru sauropods: Implications for growth and biology: Paleobiology, v. 26, p. 466–488.Google Scholar
Scarborough, R., 2000, Site stratigraphy and depositional environment for Sonorasaurus thompsoni in the Whetstone Mountains, Pima County, Arizona: Southwest Paleontological Symposium, Mesa, Arizona, v. 7, p. 73–82.Google Scholar
Schafroth, D.W., 1968, Stratigraphy of some Cretaceous Formations of southeastern Arizona, in Titley, S.R., ed., Southern Arizona Guidebook III: Arizona Geological Society Guidebook, p. 60–63.Google Scholar
Scott, R.W., 2007, Late Aptian-early Albian bivalves of the Comanchean and Sonoran shelves: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, v. 39, p. 7–39.Google Scholar
Scott, R.W., Molineux, A., Löser, H., and Mancini, E.A., 2007, Lower Albian sequence stratigraphy and coral buildups: Glen Rose Formation, Texas, U.S.A., in Scott, R.W., ed., Cretaceous Rudists and Carbonate Platforms, Environmental Feedback, v. 87: SEPM Special Publication, p. 181–191.Google Scholar
Smith, J.B., Vann, D.R., and Dodson, P., 2005, Dental morphology and variation in theropod dinosaurs: Implications for the taxonomic identification of isolated teeth: The Anatomical Record Part A, v. 285A, p. 699–736.Google Scholar
Stein, K., and Sander, P.M., 2009, Histological core drilling: a less destructive method for studying bone histology, in Brown, M.A., Kane, J.F., and Parker, W.G., eds., Methods In Fossil Preparation: Proceedings of the First Annual Fossil Preparation and Collections Symposium, p. 69–80.Google Scholar
Stoyanow, A., 1949, Lower Cretaceous stratigraphy in southeastern Arizona: Geological Society of America Memoirs, v. 38, p. 1–183.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.P., 2009, A reevaluation of Brachiosaurus altithorax Riggs, 1903 (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) and its generic separation from Brachiosaurus brancai (Janensch, 1914): Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 29, p. 787–806.Google Scholar
Thayer, D.W., and Ratkevitch, R., 1995, In-progress excavation at the mid-Cretaceous Turney Ranch Formation, southeastern Arizona: Proceedings of the Southwestern Paleontological Society, v. 3, p. 63–74.Google Scholar
Thayn, G.F., Tidwell, W.D., and Stokes, W.L., 1985, Flora of the Lower Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah and Colorado, part III: Icacinoxylon pittiense n. sp: American Journal of Botany, v. 72, p. 175–180.Google Scholar
Thayn, G.F., Tidwell, W.D., and Stokes, W.L., 1983, Flora of the Lower Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah and Colorado, Part I. Paraphyllanthoxylon utahense: Western North American Naturalist, v. 43, p. 394–402.Google Scholar
Tidwell, V., Carpenter, K., and Brooks, W., 1999, New sauropod from the Lower Cretaceous of Utah, USA: Oryctos, v. 2, p. 21–37.Google Scholar
Tidwell, W.D., and Thayn, G.F., 1985, Flora of the Lower Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah and Colorado, Part IV: Palaeopiceoxylon thinosus (Protopinaceae): The Southwestern Naturalist, v. 30, p. 525–532.Google Scholar
Trujillo, K.C., and Chamberlain, K.R., 2013, The Morrison Formation U/Pb dating project: Using high-precision, chemical abrasion (CA-TIMS), single zircon, ashfall dates for chronostratigraphic correlations: Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Abstracts with Programs, v. 33, p. 227A.Google Scholar
Upchurch, P., Barrett, P.M., and Dodson, P., 2004, Sauropoda, in Weishampel, D.B., Dodson, P., and Osmólska H., eds, Berkeley, University of California Press, p. 259–324.Google Scholar
White, T., González, L., Ludvigson, G., and Poulson, C., 2001, Middle Cretaceous greenhouse hydrologic cycle of North America: Geology, v. 29, p. 363–366.Google Scholar
Williams, B.A., Kay, R.F., Kirk, E.C., and Ross, C.F., 2010, Darwinius masillae is a strepsirrhinee a reply to Franzen et al. (2009): Journal of Human Evolution, v. 59, p. 567–573.Google Scholar
Wilson, C.J., and Jackson, R.B., 2006, Xylem cavitation caused by drought and freezing stress in four co-occurring Juniperus species: Physiologia Plantarum, v. 127, p. 374–382.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.A., 1999, A nomenclature for vertebral laminae in sauropods and other saurischian dinosaurs: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 19, p. 639–653.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.A., 2002, Sauropod dinosaur phylogeny: critique and cladistic analysis: Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 136, p. 217–276.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.A., 2006, Anatomical nomenclature of fossil vertebrates: standardized terms or lingua franca?: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 26, p. 511–518.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.A., 2012, New vertebral laminae and patterns of serial variation in vertebral laminae of sauropod dinosaurs: Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, v. 32, p. 91–110.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.A., and Sereno, P.C., 1998, Early evolution and higher-level phylogeny of sauropod dinosaurs: Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir, v. 5, p. 1–68.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.A., and Upchurch, P., 2003, A revision of Titanosaurus Lydekker (Dinosauria-Sauropoda), the first dinosaur genus with a ‘Gondwanan’ distribution: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 1, p. 125–160.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.A., and Upchurch, P., 2009, Redescription and reassessment of the phylogenetic affinities of Euhelopus zdanskyi (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) from the Late Jurassic or Early Cretaceous of China: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 7, p. 199–239.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.A., D’Emic, M.D., Curry Rogers, K.A., Mohabey, D.M., and Sen, S., 2009, Reassessment of the sauropod dinosaur Jainosaurus (=“Antarctosaurus”) septentrionalis from the Upper Cretaceous of India: Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, v. 32, p. 17–40.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.A., D’Emic, M.D., Ikejiri, T., Moacdieh, E.M., and Whitlock, J.A., 2011, A nomenclature for vertebral fossae in sauropods and other saurischian dinosaurs: PLoS ONE, v. 6, e17114.Google Scholar
Wings, O., and Sander, P.M., 2007, No gastric mill in sauropod dinosaurs: new evidence from analysis of gastrolith mass and function in ostriches: Proceedings of the Royal Society B, v. 274, p. 635–640.Google Scholar
Worbes, M., 1999, Annual growth rings, rainfall-dependent growth and long-term growth patterns of tropical trees from the Caparo Forest Reserve in Venezuela: Journal of Ecology, v. 87, p. 391–403.Google Scholar