Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T16:54:02.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Penaeoid Decapoda (Dendrobranchiata) from the Luoping Biota (Middle Triassic) of China: Systematics and Taphonomic Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Carrie E. Schweitzer ,
Rodney M. Feldmann ,
Shixue Hu ,
Jinyuan Huang ,
Changyong Zhou ,
Qiyue Zhang ,
Wen Wen  and
Tao Xie
Carrie E. Schweitzer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University at Stark, 6000 Frank Avenue NW, North Canton, OH 44720, USA,
Rodney M. Feldmann
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA,
Shixue Hu
Affiliation:
Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chengdu, 610081, China, Chengdu Center of China Geological Survey, No.2, N-3-Section, First Ring, Chengdu 610081, China
Jinyuan Huang
Affiliation:
Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chengdu, 610081, China, Chengdu Center of China Geological Survey, No.2, N-3-Section, First Ring, Chengdu 610081, China
Changyong Zhou
Affiliation:
Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chengdu, 610081, China, Chengdu Center of China Geological Survey, No.2, N-3-Section, First Ring, Chengdu 610081, China
Qiyue Zhang
Affiliation:
Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chengdu, 610081, China, Chengdu Center of China Geological Survey, No.2, N-3-Section, First Ring, Chengdu 610081, China
Wen Wen
Affiliation:
Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chengdu, 610081, China, Chengdu Center of China Geological Survey, No.2, N-3-Section, First Ring, Chengdu 610081, China
Tao Xie
Affiliation:
Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chengdu, 610081, China, Chengdu Center of China Geological Survey, No.2, N-3-Section, First Ring, Chengdu 610081, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two new genera, Anisaeger and Distaeger, and three new species, Anisaeger brevirostrus, A. spiniferus, and Distaeger prodigiosus, extend the range of the Aegeridae (Dendrobranchiata, Penaeoidea) into the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of China. Seven decapod crustacean species are now known from the Luoping biota of southern China. Morphological features of shrimp that are present but rarely mentioned in the neontological literature are recognized as potentially useful in classifying fossil material, including a diaeresis on the exopod of the uropods and multiarticulate flagellae on pleopods. Unusual taphonomic features of the shrimp include fractured cuticle, preservation in lateral, dorsal, and ventral position, and twisted cephalothoraxes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 88 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 457 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Assmann, P. 1927. Die Decapodenkrebse des deutschen Muschelkalks. Jahrbuch der Königliche Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt zu Berlin, 48:332–356.Google Scholar
Borradaile, L. A. 1910. The Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905, under the leadership of Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner. Volume 2, No. 10. Peanaeidea, Stenopidea and Reptantia from the Western Indian Ocean. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, series 2, Zoology, 13:257–264, pl. 16.Google Scholar
Burkenroad, M. D. 1940. Preliminary descriptions of twenty-one new species of pelagic Penaeidae (Crustacea Decapoda) from the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 11 (6):35–54.Google Scholar
Burkenroad, M. D. 1963. The evolution of the Eucarida (Crustacea, Eumalacostraca) in relation to the fossil record. Tulane Studies in Geology, 2:3–16.Google Scholar
Chace, F. A. Jr. 1939. Reports on the Scientific Results of the First Atlantis Expedition to the West Indies, under the Joint Auspices of the University of Havana and Harvard University. Preliminary Descriptions of one New Genus and Seventeen New Species of Decapod and Stomatopod Crustacea. Memorias de la Sociedad Cubana de Historia Natural, 13:31–54.Google Scholar
Charbonnier, S. and Garassino, A. 2012. The marine arthropods from the Solnhofen Lithographic Limestones (Late Jurassic, Germany) in the collections of the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. Geodiversitas, 34:857–871.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1852. Parts I and II, Crustacea. U.S. Exploring Expedition During the Years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842, under the Command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., 13:1–1,618, 1 map; separate folio atlas with 96 pls. C. Sherman, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Desmarest, A. G. 1822. Histoire naturelle des Crustacés fossiles. Les Crustacés proprement dits. F. G. Levrault, Paris, p. 67–154, pls. 5–11.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1775. Systema Entomologiae, sistens Insectorum classes, ordines, genera, species, adiectis synonymis, locis, descriptionibus, observationibus. In Officina Libraria Kortii, Flensbergi et Lipsiae, p. i–xxx, 1–832.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1807. In Illiger, Die Neueste Gattungs-Eintheilung der Schmetterlinge aus den Linneischen Gattungen Papilio und Sphinx. Magazin für Insectenkunde. Sechster Band. Braunschweig, 6:277–289.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M. and Schweitzer, C. E. 2010. The oldest shrimp (Devonian: Famennian) and remarkable preservation of soft tissue. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 30:629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Schweitzer, C. E., Hu, S., Zhang, Q., Zhou, C., Xie, T., Huang, J., and Wen, W. 2012. Decapoda from the Luoping biota (Middle Triassic) of China. Journal of Paleontology, 86:425–441.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Vega, F. J., Martinez-Lopez, L., González-Rodríguez, K. A., González-León, O., and Fernández-Barajas, M. Del R. 2007. Crustacea from the Muhi Quarry (Albian–Cenomanian), and a review of Aptian Mecochiridae (Astacidea) from Mexico. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 76:145–156.Google Scholar
Förster, R. 1967. Die reptanten Dekapoden der Trias. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 128 (2):136–194.Google Scholar
Garassino, A. 1994. The macruran decapod crustaceans of the Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon. Paleontologia Lombarda, Milano, (nuova serie) 3:1–27, pls. 1–13.Google Scholar
Garassino, A. and Teruzzi, G. 1990. The genus Aeger Münster, 1839 in the Sinemurian of Osteno in Lombardy (Crustacea, Decapoda). Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, 131:105–136.Google Scholar
Garassino, A., Hagdorn, H., and Schulz, M. 1999. A decapod crustacean assemblage from the Middle Triassic Upper Muschelkalk of Groβenlüder (Hessen, Germany). Geologisches Jahrbuch Hessen Wiesbaden, 127:71–81.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1969. Decapoda, p. R400–R533, R626–R628. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. R Arthropoda (4) (2). Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Haworth, A. H. 1825. A new binary arrangement of the macrurous Crustacea. The Philosophical Magazine and Journal, 65:183–184.Google Scholar
Hu, S., Zhang, Q., Zhou, C., Lü, T., and Wen, W. 2010. An exceptionally preserved biota from the Middle Triassic of Yunnan Province, SW China. Poster presented at the International Paleontological Congress 3, London.Google Scholar
Huang, J., Feldmann, R. M., Schweitzer, C. E., Hu, S., Zhou, C., Benton, M. J., Zhang, Q., Wen, W., and Xie, T. 2013. A new shrimp (Decapoda, Dendrobranchiata, Penaeoidea) from the Middle Triassic of Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Journal of Paleontology, 87:603–611.Google Scholar
Krøyer, H. 1838. Conspectus Crustaceorum Groenlandiæ. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, 2:249–261.Google Scholar
Langenhan, A. 1910. Die Versteinerungen der deutschen Trias (des Buntsandsteins, Muschelkalks und Keupers): aufgrund viersigjähriger Sammeltätigkeit zusammengestellt und nach den Naturobjekten augraphiert. Scholz, Liegnitz, 1903, and Selbstverlag, Friedrichsroda, 1910.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1802 –1803. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière, des Crustacés et des Insectes, 3:1–468. F. Dufart, Paris.Google Scholar
Lockington, W. N. 1878. Notes on Pacific Coast Crustacea. Bulletin of the Essex Institute, 10:159–165.Google Scholar
McKay, M. R. 1968. The North American Aegeridae (Lepidoptera): a revision based on late-instar larvae. Entomological Society of Canada Memoir No. 58, 112 p.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A. 1881. Description de quelques crustacés macroures provenant des grandes profondeurs de la Mer des Antilles. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 6 (11):1–15.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A. and Bouvier, E.-L., 1909. Reports on the results of dredging, under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico (1877–1878), in the Caribbean Sea (1878–1879), and along the Atlantic coast of the United States (1880), by the U.S.N. Coast Survey Steamer ”Blake”, Lieut.-Com. C.D. Sigsbee, U.S.N., and Commander J.R. Bartlett, US.N. Commanding. 44. Les Pénéides et Sténopides. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 27:177–274, pls. 1–9.Google Scholar
Münster, G. G., zu. 1839. Abbildung und Beschreibung der fossilen langschwänzigen Krebse in den Kalkschiefern von Bayern. Beiträge zur Petrefactenkunde, 2:1–88, pls. I–XXIX.Google Scholar
Oppel, A. 1862. Ueber jurassische Crustaceen. Palaeontologische Mitteilungen aus dem Museum der K. Bayerischen Staates, 1:1–120.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A. 1898. Gliederfüssler: Arthropoda, p. 1,057–1,168. In Dr. H. G. Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, 5 (2), Crustacea, Malacostraca, (47–52) [Systematik].Google Scholar
Pérez Farfante, I. and Kensley, B. 1997. Penaeoid and sergestoid shrimps and prawns of the world. Keys and diagnoses for the families and genera. Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 175:1–233.Google Scholar
Pinna, G. 1975 [Imprint 1974]. I crostacei della fauna triassica di Cene in Val Seriana (Bergamo). Memorie della Società italiana di Scienze naturali e del Museo civico di Storia naturale in Milano, 21 (1):5–34.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R. 1986. Taphonomy of a modern shrimp: implications for the arthropod fossil record. Palaios, 1:286–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature, ou tableau de l'univers et des corps organisée. L'Imprimerie de Jean Barravecchia, Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Risso, A. 1816. Histoire naturelle des crustacés des environs de Nice. Librairie Grecque-Latine-Allemande, Paris, p. 1–175, pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E. F. 1822. Nachträge zur Petrefactenkunde. Beiträge zur näheren Bestimmung der versteinerten und fossilen Krebsarten. 2 volumes + atlas, Becker, Gotha.Google Scholar
Schweigert, G. 2001. The late Jurassic decapod species Aeger tipularius (Schlotheim, 1822) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Aegeridae). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, (B), 309:1–10.Google Scholar
Schweigert, G. and Garassino, A. 2005. First record of the shrimp genus Carpopenaeus Glaessner, 1945 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Carpopenaeidae) from the Jurassic. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie Paläontologie, (Monatshefte) 2005:490–502, 4 figs.Google Scholar
Smith, S. I. 1884. Report on the decapod Crustacea of the Albatross dredgings off the East coast of the United States in 1883. Reports of the United States Fisheries Commission, 10:345–426, pls. 1–10.Google Scholar
Spence Bate, C. 1881. On the Penaeidae. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 5 (8):169–196, pls. 11, 12.Google Scholar
Spence Bate, C. 1888. Report on the Crustacea Macrura collected by the Challenger during the years 1873–76. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. “Challenger” during the years 1873–76. Volume 24:i–xcl; 1–942; pls. 1–157.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. F. 1829. Systematic Catalogue of British Insects, Part 2. Baldwin and Craddock, London, 388 p.Google Scholar
Stimpson, W. 1860. Prodromus descriptionis animalium evertebratorum, quae in Expeditione ad Oceanum Pacificum Septentrionalem, a Republic Federata missa, Cadwaladore Ringgold et Johanne Rodgers Ducibus, observavit et descripsit. Pars VIII, Crustacea Macrura. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1860:91–116.Google Scholar
Strand, E. 1928. Miscellanea nomenclatoria zoologica et palaeontologica. I–II. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Abteilung A, Part 8, p. 30–75.Google Scholar
Wiegmann, A. 1836. Beschreibung einiger neuen Crustaceen des Berliner Museums aus Mexiko und Brasilien. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 2:145–151.Google Scholar
Wood-Mason, J. and Alcock, A. 1891. Phylum Appendiculata. Branch Arthropoda. Class Crustacea. Natural history notes from H. M. Indian marine survey steamer “Investigator”, Commander R. F. Hoskyn, R. N., commanding. No. 21. Note on the results of deep sea dredging during the season 1890–1891. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6 (8):268–286.Google Scholar
Wood-Mason, J. and Alcock, A. 1892. Natural history notes from H. M. Indian marine survey steamer ”Investigator”, Commander R. F. Hoskyn, R. N., commanding. Series II, No. 1. On the results of deepsea dredging during the season 1890–1891. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6 (9):265–275, pls. 14, 15.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1866. On a new Crustacean, (Aeger marderi) from the Lias of Lyme Regis, Dorsetshire. Geological Magazine, 3:10–13.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1888. On a new species of Aeger from the lower Lias of Wilmcotte, Warwickshire. Geological Magazine, 5:385–387.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. Y., Zhou, C. Y., Lu, T., Xie, T., Lou, X. Y., Liu, W., Sun, Y. Y., and Jiang, X. S. 2008. Discovery and significance of the Middle Triassic Anisian biota from Luoping, Yunnan Province. Geological Review, 54:145–149. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. Y., Zhou, C.Y., Lu, T., Xie, T., Lou, X. Y., Liu, W., Sun, Y. Y., Huang, J. Y., and Zhao, L. S. 2009. A conodont-based Middle Triassic age assignment for the Luoping Biota of Yunnan, China. Science in China Series D–Earth Sciences, 52:1,673–1,678.Google Scholar