Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-xvx2z Total loading time: 0.278 Render date: 2021-08-06T02:23:43.346Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The Middle Devonian (Givetian) ammonoid Pharciceras from the New Albany Shale, Kentucky

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

David M. Work
Affiliation:
Maine State Museum, 83 State House Station, Augusta 04333-0083,
Charles E. Mason
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Sciences, Morehead State University, Morehead, Kentucky 40351,
Gilbert Klapper
Affiliation:
emeritus, Department of Geoscience, The University of Iowa; present address: 1010 Eastwood Road, Glencoe, Illinois 60022-1125,

Extract

Pharciceras Hyatt, 1884 is the diagnostic ammonoid of the late middle Givetian Stage of the Middle Devonian Series. It occurs in the Rhenish Massif in Germany, the Montagne Noire in southern France, and in equivalent strata in the Anti-Atlas in southern Morocco. Verified North American occurrences of Pharciceras are confined to the New York succession, where the appearance of the ancestral species P. amplexum (Hall, 1886) in the Upper Tully Limestone represents an important and well-established biostratigraphic datum within the Taghanic onlap interval (see Aboussalam and Becker, 2001 for discussion). In this note we describe a second, distinctly younger, North American species, Pharciceras barnetti n. sp., from the New Albany Shale in eastcentral Kentucky that provides new evidence on the Taghanic onlap interval (Upper Tully/Geneseo Sequence of Baird and Brett, 2003) in the central Appalachian Basin. This occurrence is particularly significant because of its association with conodonts that provide a basis for refined correlations between the central Appalachian Basin and the Taghanic onlap succession in New York.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboussalam, Z. S. 2003. Das “Taghanic-Event” im höheren Mittel-Devon von West-Europa und Marokko. Münstersche Forschungen zur Geologie und Paläontologie, 97, 330 p.Google Scholar
Aboussalam, Z. S. and Becker, R. T. 2001. Prospects for an upper Givetian substage. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe, 4:8399.Google Scholar
Aboussalam, Z. S. and Becker, R. T. 2004. Givetian stratigraphy and faunas at Tiguisselt (Tata region, Dra Valley, Morocco), p. 6063. In El Hassani, A. (ed.), Devonian neritic-pelagic correlation and events in the Dra Valley (western Anti Atlas, Morocco). Documents de l'Institut Scientifique, Rabat, 19 [Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy International Meeting on Stratigraphy, Rabat, Morocco, 1-10 March 2004].Google Scholar
Aboussalam, Z. S., Becker, R. T., Bockwinkel, J., and Ebbighausen, V. 2004. Givetian biostratigraphy and facies development at Oufrane (Tata region, eastern Dra Valley, Morocco), p. 5359. In El Hassani, A. (ed.), Devonian neritic-pelagic correlation and events in the Dra Valley (western Anti Atlas, Morocco). Documents de l'Institut Scientifique, Rabat, 19 [Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy International Meeting on Stratigraphy, Rabat, Morocco, 1-10 March 2004].Google Scholar
Baird, G. C. and Brett, C. E. 2003. Shelf and off-shelf deposits of the Tully Formation in New York and Pennsylvania: Faunal incursions, eustacy and tectonics. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 242:141156.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T. and House, M. R. 1999. Late Givetian and Frasnian succession at Bou Tchrafine (Anti-Atlas, southern Morocco), p. 2837. In El Hassani, A. and Tahiri, A. (eds.), SDS-IGCP 421 Meeting, 24 April–1 May 1999, Excursion Guidebook, Pt. 1, Tafilalt and Maider (eastern Anti-Atlas), Rabat.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T., Aboussalam, S. Z., Bockwinkel, J., Ebbighausen, V., El Hassani, A., and Nübel, H. 2004. The Givetian and Frasnian at Oued Mzerreb (Tata region, eastern Dra Valley), p. 2943. In El Hassani, A. (ed.), Devonian neritic-pelagic correlation and events in the Dra Valley (western Anti Atlas, Morocco). Documents de l'Institut Scientifique, Rabat, 19[Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy International Meeting on Stratigraphy, Rabat, Morocco, 1-10 March 2004].Google Scholar
Bensaïd, M. 1974. Etude sur des Goniatites à la limite du Dévonien moyen et supérieur, du Sud marocain. Notes et Mémoires du Service Géologique du Maroc, 36:81140.Google Scholar
Bensaïd, M., Bultynck, P., Sartenaer, P., Walliser, O. H., and Ziegler, W. 1985. The Givetian–Frasnian boundary in pre-Sahara Morocco. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 75:287300.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., Baird, G. C., and Alexander, A. J. 2004. Sequence stratigraphy of highly variable Middle Devonian strata in central Kentucky: Implications for regional correlations and depositional environments, p. 3554. In Schieber, J. and Lazar, R. (eds.), Devonian Black Shales of the Eastern U.S. New Insights into Sedimentology and Stratigraphy from the Subsurface and Outcrops in the Illinois and Appalachian Basins. Field Guide for the 2004 Annual Field Conference of the Great Lakes Section of SEPM. Indiana Geological Survey Open-File Report, 04-05.Google Scholar
Bryant, W. L. 1921. The Genesee conodonts, with descriptions of new species. Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences Bulletin, 13(2), 59 p.Google Scholar
Feist, R. and Klapper, G. 1985. Stratigraphy and conodonts in pelagic sequences across the Middle-Upper Devonian boundary, Montagne Noire, France. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 188:118.Google Scholar
Frech, F. 1902. Über devonische Ammoneen. Beiträge zur Paläontologie und Geologie des Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients, 14:27111.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1886. Fifth annual report of the State Geologist for 1885. New York Assembly Document, 105, 47 p.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 1973. Nature, origin, and significance of the Tully Limestone. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 138, 244 p.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1879. On conodonts from the Chazy and Cincinnati Group of the Cambro–Silurian, and from the Hamilton and Genesee-Shale divisions of the Devonian, in Canada and the United States. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 35:351369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, M. R. 1962. Observations on the ammonoid succession of the North American Devonian. Journal of Paleontology, 36:247284.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1965. Study in the Tornoceratidae: The succession of Tornoceras and related genera in the North American Devonian. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B, Biological Sciences, 250:79130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, M. R. 1978. Devonian ammonoids from the Appalachians and their bearing on international zonation and correlation. Palaeontological Association Special Paper, 21, 70 p.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 2002. Strength, timing, setting and cause of mid-Palaeozoic extinctions. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 181:525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, M. R. and Becker, R. T. 1999. Goniatite biozonation of the Pharciceras Stufe (late Givetian–basal Frasnian), p. 2223. In Feist, R., Talent, J., and Orth, B. (eds.), Abstracts, Errachidia Meeting SDS—IGCP 421, 23 April–1 May 1999, Montpellier.Google Scholar
House, M. R., Kirchgasser, W. T., Price, J. D., and Wade, G. 1985. Goniatites from the Frasnian (Upper Devonian) and adjacent strata of the Montagne Noire. Hercynica, 1:121.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W.(assisted byRepetski, J. E.). 1981. Conodonts from the Genesee Formation in western New York. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1032-B, 66 p.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1884. Genera of fossil cephalopods. Boston Society of Natural History Proceedings, 22:253338.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1900. Cephalopoda, p. 502604. In Zittel-Eastman Text-Book of Paleontology. I. MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
Kirchgasser, W. T. 2000. Correlation of stage boundaries in the Appalachian Devonian eastern United States. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 225:271284.Google Scholar
Klapper, G. 1981. Review of New York Devonian conodont biostratigraphy, p. 5766. In Oliver, W. A. and Klapper, G. (eds.), Devonian Biostratigraphy of New York. International Union of Geological Sciences, Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy. Pt. 1.Google Scholar
Klapper, G. and Johnson, J. G. 1990. Revisions of Middle Devonian conodont zones, p. 934936, 941. In Johnson, J. G., Lower and Middle Devonian brachiopod-dominated communities of Nevada, and their position in a biofacies-province-realm model. Journal of Paleontology, 64:902–941.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., Philip, G. M., and Jackson, J. H. 1970. Revision of the Polygnathus varcus Group (Conodonta, Middle Devonian). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, Jahrgang 1970(11):650667.Google Scholar
Korn, D. and Klug, C. 2002. Ammoneae Devonicae, p. 1375. In Riegraf, W. (ed.), Fossilium Catalogus, Animalia I. Backhuys, Leiden.Google Scholar
Korn, D. and Wunderlich, K. 1982. Ammonoideen aus der Pharciceras-Zone (Oberdevon 1α) von Wuppertal. Jahresberichte des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Wuppertal, 35:8995.Google Scholar
Kullmann, J. and Ziegler, W. 1970. Conodonten und Goniatiten von der Grenze Mittel/Oberdevon aus dem Profil am Martenberg (Ostrand des Rheinischen Schiefergebirges). Geologica et Palaeontologica, 4:7385.Google Scholar
Menchikoff, N. 1930. Recherches geologiques dans le Nord du Sahara occidental. Revue de Géographie Physique et de Géologie Dynamique, 8:1144.Google Scholar
Montesinos, J. R. and Henn, A. H. 1986. La fauna de Pharciceras (Ammonoidea) de la Formación Cardaño (Dominio Palentino, Cordillera Cantábrica, NO de España). Trabajos de Geologia, 16:6176.Google Scholar
Orr, R. W. and Klapper, G. 1968. Two new conodont species from Middle-Upper Devonian boundary beds of Indiana and New York. Journal of Paleontology, 42:10661075.Google Scholar
Petter, G. 1959. Goniatites dévoniennes du Sahara. Publications du Service de la Carte Géologique de l'Algérie, nouvelle série, Paléontologie, Mémoires, 2, 313 p.Google Scholar
Ruzhencev, V. E. 1957. Phylogenetic system of the Paleozoic Ammonoidea. Byulleten' Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody, otdel geologicheskii, 32(2):4964. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Sandberger, G. and Sandberger, F. 1850-1856. Die Versteinerungen des rheinischen Schichtensystems in Nassau. Mit einer kurzgefassten Geognosie dieses Gebietes und mit steter Berücksichtigung analoger Schichten anderer Länder. I–XIV. Kreidel and Niedner, Wiesbaden, 564 p.Google Scholar
Wirth, M. 1967. Zur Gliederung des höheren Paläozoikums (Givet–Namur) im Gebiet des Quinto Real (Westpyrenäen) mit Hilfe von Conodonten. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 127:179244.Google Scholar
Wittekindt, H. 1966. Zur Conodontenchronologie des Mitteldevons. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen, 9:621646. (Imprinted 1965)Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1966. Eine Verfeinerung der Conodontengliederung an der Grenze Mittel-/Oberdevon. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen, 9:647676. (Imprinted 1965)Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. and Klapper, G. 1976. Systematic Paleontology, p. 117127. In Ziegler, W., Klapper, G., and Johnson, J. G., Redefinition and subdivision of the varcus-Zone (Conodonts, Middle-?Upper Devonian) in Europe and North America. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 10:109–140.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., Klapper, G., and Johnson, J. G. 1976. Redefinition and subdivision of the varcus-Zone (Conodonts, Middle-?Upper Devonian) in Europe and North America. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 10:109140.Google Scholar
7
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Middle Devonian (Givetian) ammonoid Pharciceras from the New Albany Shale, Kentucky
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Middle Devonian (Givetian) ammonoid Pharciceras from the New Albany Shale, Kentucky
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Middle Devonian (Givetian) ammonoid Pharciceras from the New Albany Shale, Kentucky
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *