Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:36:45.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where Do People Drive? Navigation System Use by Typical Drivers and Auto Experts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2011

Victor Ei-Wen Lo ,
Paul A. Green  and
Alfred Franzblau
Victor Ei-Wen Lo*
Affiliation:
(Driver Interface Group, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute) (Department of Environment Health Sciences, University of Michigan)
Paul A. Green
Affiliation:
(Driver Interface Group, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute)
Alfred Franzblau
Affiliation:
(Department of Environment Health Sciences, University of Michigan)
*
(Email: loe@umich.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To effectively design navigation and travel information systems, car manufacturers need data on how these systems are typically used. In this study, researchers surveyed thirty typical drivers and eleven auto experts to determine previously visited destinations, favourite destinations, and other information. Unexpectedly, subjects predominantly reported they used navigation systems to reach familiar destinations (typical drivers: 61%; auto experts: 89%). History was self-reported to be a very common entry method (typical drivers: 30%; auto experts: 24%), which conflicted with data retrieved from navigation systems (both groups: <1%). Based on the history list, common trip purposes included Shopping and visiting Friends' Houses.

Keywords

Navigation SystemsDestination Entry MethodPurpose of TripSurvey
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 357 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers (2006). Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication system. Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers, Washington, D.C. (Retrieved April 9th, 2010 from http://www.autoalliance.org/index.cfm?objectid=FEBE7E1E-1D09-317F-BB37BB6AEC474F27).Google Scholar
Bourguet, M. L. (2006). Towards a taxonomy of error-handling strategies in recognition-based multi-modal human-computer interfaces. Signal Processing, 86(12), 3625–3643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnet, G. (2000). ‘Turn right at the traffic lights’: The requirement for landmarks in vehicle navigation systems. The Journal of Navigation, 53, 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C., & Graham, R. (2000). Experimental comparison of manual and voice controls for the operation of in-vehicle systems. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (CD-ROM). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Transport. (2009). Transport Statistics Bulletin, National Travel Survey: 2008. London: United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Eby, D. W., and Molnar, L. J. (2001). In-vehicle route guidance preferences of driving tourists. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 6(3), 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford Sync®. (Retrieved April 9th, 2010 from http://www.fordvehicles.com/innovation/sync/)Google Scholar
Forlines, C., Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Raj, B., Wittenburg, P., & Wolf, P. (2005). A comparison between spoken queries and menu-based interfaces for in-car digital music selection (TR2005-020). Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Cambridge, MA. (Retrieved April 9th from http://www.merl.com/publications/TR2005-020/).Google Scholar
Gärtner, U., König, W., and Wittig, T. (2001). Evaluation of manual vs. speech input when using a driver information system in real traffic. International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design: Driving Assessment 2001 (pp. 7–13), Aspen, CO.Google Scholar
Geutner, P., Steffens, F., Manstetten, D. (2002). Design of the VICO spoken dialogue system: evaluation of user expectations by wizard-of-oz experiments. Proceedings of Language Recourses Evaluation Conference (LREC), Las Palmas, Spain.Google Scholar
Itoh, K., Miki, Y., Yoshitsugu, N., Kubo, N., & Mashimo, S. (2004). Evaluation of a voice-activated system using a driving simulator (SAE paper 2004-01-0232). Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.Google Scholar
Lee, W-C., Ma, M-C., and Cheng, B-W., (2010). Field comparison of driving performance using a portable navigation systems. The Journal of Navigation, 63, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, E-W., Walls, S. M., and Green, P. A. (2007). Simulation of iPod music selection by drivers: typical user task time and patterns for manual and speech interfaces (UMTRI Technical Report 2007-9). University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Hu, P. S., and Reuscher, T. R. (2004). Summary of travel trends: 2001 national household travel survey. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., United States.Google Scholar
May, A. J., Ross, T., and Bayer, S. H. (2003). Driver's information requirements when navigating in an urban environment. The Journal of Navigation, 56, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manstetten, D., Krautter, W., Grothkopp, B., Steffens, F., and Geutner, P. (2001). Using a driving simulator to perform wizard-of-oz experiment on speech-controlled driver information systems. Proceedings of the 1st Human-Centered Transportation Simulation Conference (HCTSC 2001), Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar
Minker, W., Haiber, U., Heisterkamp, P., and Scheible, S. (2004). The SENECA spoken language dialogue system. Speech Communication, 43(1), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellom, B., Ward, W., Hansen, J., Cole, R., Hacioglu, K., Zhang, J., Yu, X., Pradhan, S. (2001). University of Colorado dialog systems for travel and navigation. Proceedings Of the 1st International Conference on Human Language Technology, (pp. 1–6). San Diego, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugliesi, E. A., Decanini, M. M., and Tachibana, V. M. (2009). Evaluation of the cartographic communication performance of a route guidance and navigation system. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36(2), 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society of Automotive Engineering (2004). SAE recommended practice navigation and route guidance function accessibility while driving (SAE J2364). Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, February 12, 2004.Google Scholar
Stutts, J. C., Reinfurt, D. W., Staplin, L., and Rodman, E. A. (2001). The role driver distraction in traffic crashes, (Technical Report). AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington D.C. (Retrieved April 9th, 2010 from http://www.aaafoundation.org/pdf/distraction.pdf.)Google Scholar
Tsimhoni, O., Smith, D., and Green, P. (2002). Destination entry while driving: speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard (UMTRI Technical Report 2001–24). University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI. (Retrieved April 9th, 2010 from http://www.umich.edu/~driving/publications.html).Google Scholar
Tsimhoni, O., Smith, D., Green, P. (2004). Address entry while driving: speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard. Human Factors, 46(6), 600–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Anderson-Wesley, Inc. Reading, MA.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Transportation (1994). FHWA study tour for national travel surveys (FHWA-PL-95-003). Washington, DC: United States. (Retrieved April 9th, 2010 from http://international.fhwa.dot.gov/links/pub_details.cfm?id=522)Google Scholar
Walls, S. M., Baron, A., and Green, P. A. (2007). Simulation of destination entry by drivers: Typical user task time and patterns for manual and speech interfaces ( UMTRI Technical Report 2007–7). University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Weng, F., Yan, B., Feng, Z., Ratiu, F., et al. (2007). CHAT to your destination. Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
Weng, F., Varges, S., Raghunathan, B., Ratiu, F., Pon-Barry, H., Lathrop, B., Zhang, Q., Scheideck, T., Bratt, H., Xu, K., Purver, M., Mishra, R., Raya, M., Peters, S., Meng, Y., Cavedon, L., and Shriberg, L. (2006). CHAT: A conversational helper for automotive tasks. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on spoken language processing (Interspeech/ICSLP), (pp. 1061–1064). Pittsburgh, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar