Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T18:16:20.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Simplified Simulation Model of Ship Navigation for Safety and Collision Avoidance in Heavy Traffic Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Ming-Chung Fang ,
Kun-Yuan Tsai  and
Chih-Chung Fang
Ming-Chung Fang
Affiliation:
(Department of Systems and Naval Mechatronic Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan)
Kun-Yuan Tsai*
Affiliation:
(Department of Systems and Naval Mechatronic Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan)
Chih-Chung Fang
Affiliation:
(Department of Systems Engineering and Naval Architecture, National Taiwan Ocean University, Taiwan)
*
(E-mail: P18031018@ncku.edu.tw)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on our previously developed ship collision avoidance steering system, this paper develops a more extensive collision avoidance decision-making system for non-uniformly moving ships. A real-time simulator based on the Six-Dimensional (6D) Manoeuvring Modelling Group (MMG) model is used to simulate the ship's motion. To validate the manoeuvring mathematical model, sea trial measurements of a container ship (C-3) have been selected. This study incorporates Nomoto's second-order model into a numerical model to calculate the turning characteristics of the ship. The manoeuvring indices of Nomoto's model are the knowledge base of the simplified ship simulation model. To verify the ship collision avoidance system with respect to different traffic factors, simple and complex collision avoidance cases have been designed in fast-time simulations with multi-ship encounter conditions. The simplified simulation model developed here can quickly determine the helm angle when the ship makes a collision avoidance manoeuvre, which is helpful for the safety of ship navigation in heavy traffic areas.

Keywords

Container ShipSea trialNomoto's second-order modelMulti-ship encounter
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , July 2018 , pp. 837 - 860
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benedict, K., Kirchhoff, M., Baldauf, M., Gluch, M. and Fischer, S. (2008). On-board Prediction Display based on Manoeuvring Simulation and Ship Condition. 35th Annual General Meeting of the International Marine Simulator Forum, Sep. 8–12, Rostock-Warnemuende Germany.Google Scholar
Clarke, D., Gedling, P. and Hine, G. (1983). The Application of Manoeuvring Criteria in Hull Design Using Linear Theory. Transactions of RINA, 45–68.Google Scholar
COLREGS. (1972). Convention on the international Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea.Google Scholar
Fang, C.C. and Yu, K.T. (2009). Numerical Study on the validation of Turning Characteristics for a Large Container Ship. Proceedings of the 9th Asia Conference on Marine Simulator and Simulation Research, June 25~ 26, Daejeon, Korea.Google Scholar
Fang, C.C. and Tsai, K.Y. (2014). An Application of Collision Avoidance System for a Container Ship with Real-Time Simulator. Proceedings of the 14th Asia Conference on Marine Simulator and Simulation Research, August 28 ~ 29, Tainan, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Fang, M-C. and Luo, J-H. (2006). On the Track Keeping and Roll Reduction of the Ship in Random Waves Using Different Sliding Mode Controllers. Ocean Engineering, 34, 3–4, 470–488.Google Scholar
Fang, M-C., Fang, C.C., Yen, C.H. and Chen, M.Y. (2012). Numerical Investigation in the Turning Characteristics for a Trimaran in Waves, Proc. of the 12th Asia Conference on Marine Simulator and Simulation Research. August 2 ~ 3, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
Fujii, Y. and Tanaka, K. (1971). Studies in Marine Traffic Engineering: Traffic Capacity. The Journal of Navigation, 24, 543–552.Google Scholar
Inoue, S., Hirano, M. and Kijima, K. (1981). Hydrodynamic Derivatives on Ship Manoeuvring. International Shipbuilding Progress, 28, 321, 112–125.Google Scholar
International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2002). Standards for Ship Manoeuvrability, Resolution MSC. 137(76).Google Scholar
Kijima, K., Nakiri, Y., Tsusui, Y. and Matsunaga, M. (1990). Prediction Method of Ship Manoeuvrability in Deep and Shallow Waters. MARSIM & ICSM 90, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Oltmann, P. (2003). Identification of Hydrodynamic Damping derivatives – a pragmatic Approach. MARSIM'03.Google Scholar
Nomoto, K. (1964). Ship Manoeuvrability. The Journal of Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 424, 794–808.Google Scholar
Nomoto, K., Taguchi, K., Honda, K. and Hirano, S. (1957). On the Steering Quality of Ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, 4, 354–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrbin, N.H. (1971). Theory and Observations on the Use of a Mathematical Model for Ship Manoeuvring in Deep and Confined Waters. SSPA, Gothenburg, Sweden, Publication 68.Google Scholar
Sugisawa, M. and Kobayshi, H. (2011). Estimation on ship maneuverability based on the correction between hydrodynamic force and moment. 11th Asian Conference on Marine Simulator and Simulation Research, August 25 ~ 26, Kure, Japan.Google Scholar
Tam, C., Bucknall, R. and Greig, A. (2009). Review of Collision Avoidance and Path Planning Methods for Ships in Closed Range Encounters. The Journal of Navigation, 62, 455–476.Google Scholar