Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:51:07.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robust train localisation method based on advanced map matching measurement-augmented tightly-coupled GNSS/INS with error-state UKF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2023

Dan Liu Open the ORCID record for Dan Liu [Opens in a new window] ,
Wei Jiang ,
Baigen Cai ,
Oliver Heirich ,
Jian Wang  and
Wei Shangguan
Dan Liu
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
Wei Jiang*
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
Baigen Cai
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
Oliver Heirich
Affiliation:
Institute of Communications and Navigation, German Aerospace Center, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Jian Wang
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
Wei Shangguan
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
*
*Corresponding author: Wei Jiang; E-mail: weijiang@bjtu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a robust train localisation system by fusing a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) with an Inertial Navigation System (INS) in a tightly-coupled (TC) strategy. To improve navigation performance in GNSS partly blocked areas, an advanced map-matching (MM) measurement-augmented TC GNSS/INS method is proposed via an error-state unscented Kalman filter (UKF). The advanced MM generates a matched position using a one-step predicted position from a UKF time update step with binary search algorithm and a point–line projection algorithm. The matched position inputs as an additional measurement to fuse with the INS position to augment the degraded GNSS pseudorange measurement to optimise the state estimation in the UKF measurement update step. Both the real train test on the Qinghai–Tibet railway and the simulation were carried out and the results confirm that the proposed advanced MM measurement-augmented TC GNSS/INS with error-state UKF provides the best horizontal positioning accuracy of 0 ⋅ 67 m, which performs an improvement of about 71% and 90% with respect to TC GNSS/INS with only error-state UKF and only error-state Extended Kalman filter in GNSS partly blocked areas.

Keywords

Robust estimationGNSSinertial navigation system (INS)unscented Kalman filtermap
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 76 , Issue 2-3 , March 2023 , pp. 316 - 339
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Navigation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheng, Y., Wenzhong, S. and Wu, C. (2017). Comparison of unscented and extended Kalman filters with application in vehicle navigation. The Journal of Navigation, 70, 411–431.Google Scholar
Clement, F. and Philippe, B. (2012). Matching raw GPS measurements on a navigable map without computing a global position. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(2), 887–898.Google Scholar
Dan, L., Wei, J., Jian, W. and Wei, S. G. (2019) A Tightly-Coupled GNSS/INS/MM Integrated System Based on Binary Search Algorithm for Train Localisation Applications. Proceedings of the 32th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2019), Miami, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
David, B., François, P. Maxime, V. and IFSTTAR (2015). Applying standard digital map data in map-aided, lane-level GNSS location. The Journal of Navigation, 68, 827–847.Google Scholar
Falco, G., Einicke, G., Malos, J. and Dovis, F. (2012). Performance analysis of constrained loosely coupled GPS/INS integration solutions. Sensors, 12(11), 15983–16007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falco, G., Pini, M. and Marucco, G. (2017). Loose and tight GNSS/INS integrations: comparison of performance assessed in real urban scenarios. Sensors, 17(255), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goshen-Meskin, D. and Bar-Itzhack, I. Y. (1992). Unified approach to inertial navigation system error modelling. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 15(3), 648–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, P. D. (2008). Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems. Boston/London: Artech House.Google Scholar
Gurnik, P. (2016). Next generation train control (NGTC): more effective railways through the convergence of main-line and urban train control systems. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 1855–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, F. and Hendeby, G. (2012). Some relations between extended and unscented Kalman filters. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 60(2), 545–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heirich, O. and Benjamin, S. (2017). Onboard Train Localisation with Track Signatures: Towards GNSS Redundancy. Proceedings of the 30th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2017), Portland, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensel, S., Hasberg, C. and Stiller, C. (2011). Probabilistic rail vehicle localisation with Eddy current sensors in topological maps. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(4), 1525–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoi-Fung, N., Guohao, Z. and Li-Ta, H. (2020). A computation effective range-based 3D mapping aided GNSS with NLOS correction method. The Journal of Navigation, 73, 1202–1222.Google Scholar
Jon, O., Alfonso, B., Iban, L. and Luis, E. D. (2017). A survey of train positioning solutions. IEEE Sensors Journal, 17(20), 6788–6797.Google Scholar
Julier, S. J., Uhlmann, J. K. and Durrant-Whyte, H. F. (1995) A New Approach for Filtering Nonlinear Systems. Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Jun, L., Xia, G. and Chengeng, S. (2020). Global capabilities of BeiDou navigation satellite system. Satellite Navigation, 1, 27.Google Scholar
Knudsen, T. and Leth, J. (2019). A new continuous discrete unscented Kalman filter. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 64(5), 2198–2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubin, C., Baiqing, H., An, L. and Fangjun, Q. (2013). Transformed unscented Kalman filter. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 58, 252–257.Google Scholar
Maaref, M. and Kassas, Z. (2020). Ground vehicle navigation in GNSS-challenged environments using signals of opportunity and a closed-loop map-matching approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(7), 10425–10437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marais, J., Beugin, J. and Berbineau, M. (2017). A survey of GNSS-based research and developments for the European railway signaling. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18(10), 2602–2618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qifan, Z., Hai, Z., You, L. and Zheng, L. (2015). An adaptive low-cost GNSS MEMS-IMU tightly-coupled integration system with aiding measurement in a GNSS signal-challenged environment. Sensors, 15, 23953–23982.Google Scholar
Qijin, C., Quan, Z., Xiaoji, N. and Jingnan, L. (2021). Semi-analytical assessment of the relative accuracy of the GNSS/INS in railway track irregularity measurements. Satellite Navigation, 2, 25.Google Scholar
Quddus, M. and Washington, S. (2015). Shortest path and vehicle trajectory aided map-matching for low frequency GPS data. Transportation Research Part C, 55, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, J., Sirui, C., Baigen, C., Jian, W. and Wei, S. G. (2018). A multi-sensor positioning method-based train localisation system for low density line. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 11(67), 10425–10437.Google Scholar
Wei, J., Dan, L., Baigen, C., Chris, R., Jian, J., W., and Wei, S.G. (2019). A fault-tolerant tightly-coupled GNSS/INS/OVS integration vehicle navigation system based on an FDP algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(7), 6365-6378.Google Scholar
Xingxing, L., Huidan, W., Shengyu, L., Shaoquan, F., Xuanbin, W. and Jianchi, L. (2021). GIL: a tightly coupled GNSS PPP/INS/LiDAR method for precise vehicle navigation. Satellite Navigation, 2, 26.Google Scholar
Yuan, X., Jing, C., Yuriy, S. S. and Yuan, Z. (2021). Distributed Kalman filter for UWB/INS integrated pedestrian localisation under colored measurement noise. Satellite Navigation, 2, 22.Google Scholar