Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:11:17.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved exponential weighted moving average based measurement noise estimation for strapdown inertial navigation system/doppler velocity log integrated system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Lanhua Hou
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Micro-Inertial Instrument and Advanced Navigation Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Xiaosu Xu*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Micro-Inertial Instrument and Advanced Navigation Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Yiqing Yao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Micro-Inertial Instrument and Advanced Navigation Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Di Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Micro-Inertial Instrument and Advanced Navigation Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Jinwu Tong
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Micro-Inertial Instrument and Advanced Navigation Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: xxs@seu.edu.cn

Abstract

The strapdown inertial navigation system (SINS) with integrated Doppler velocity log (DVL) is widely utilised in underwater navigation. In the complex underwater environment, however, the DVL information may be corrupted, and as a result the accuracy of the Kalman filter in the SINS/DVL integrated system degrades. To solve this, an adaptive Kalman filter (AKF) with measurement noise estimator to provide noise statistical characteristics is generally applied. However, existing methods like moving windows (MW) and exponential weighted moving average (EWMA) cannot adapt to a dynamic environment, which results in unsatisfactory noise estimation performance. Moreover, the forgetting factor has to be determined empirically. Therefore, this paper proposes an improved EWMA (IEWMA) method with adaptive forgetting factor for measurement noise estimation. First, the model for a SINS/DVL integrated system is established, then the MW and EWMA based measurement noise estimators are illustrated. Subsequently, the proposed IEWMA method which is adaptive to the various environments without experience is introduced. Finally, simulation and vehicle tests are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Results show that the proposed method outperforms the MW and EWMA methods in terms of measurement noise estimation and navigation accuracy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almagbile, A., Wang, J. and Ding, W. (2010). Evaluating the performances of Adaptive Kalman filter methods in GPS/INS integration. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 9(1), 3340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliav, R. and Klein, I. (2018). INS/Partial DVL measurements fusion with correlated process and measurement noise. Proceedings, 4(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-5-05727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzen, J. and Fingscheidt, T. (2019). Improved Measurement Noise Covariance Estimation for N-channel Feedback Cancellation Based on the Frequency Domain Adaptive Kalman Filter. ICASSP 2019–2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 965969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, B., Gao, S., Hu, G., Zhong, Y. and Gu, C. (2017). Maximum likelihood principle and moving horizon estimation based adaptive unscented Kalman filter. Aerospace Science & Technology, 73, 184196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, W., Li, J., Zhou, G. and Li, Q. (2015). Adaptive Kalman filtering with recursive noise estimator for integrated SINS/DVL systems. Journal of Navigation, 68(1), 142161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-García, J., Gómez-Espinosa, A., Cuan-Urquizo, E., García-Valdovinos, L. G., Salgado-Jiménez, T. and Cabello, J. A. E. (2020). Autonomous underwater vehicles: localization, navigation, and communication for collaborative missions. Applied Sciences, 10(4), 1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, G., Gao, B., Zhong, Y., Ni, L. and Gu, C. (2019). Robust unscented Kalman filtering with measurement error detection for tightly coupled INS/GNSS Integration in hypersonic vehicle navigation. IEEE Access, 7, 151409151421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, G., Ni, L., Gao, B., Zhu, X., Wang, W. and Zhong, Y. (2020). Model predictive based unscented Kalman filter for hypersonic vehicle navigation with INS/GNSS integration. IEEE Access, 8, 48144823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, G., Wang, W., Zhong, Y., Gao, B. and Gu, C. (2018). A new direct filtering approach to INS/GNSS integration. Aerospace Science and Technology, 77, 755764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2017). A new process uncertainty robust Student's t based Kalman filter for SINS/GPS integration. IEEE Access, 5, 1439114404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, B., Guo, J., He, D. and Guo, W. (2017). Adaptive Kalman filtering based on optimal autoregressive predictive model. GPS Solutions, 21(2), 307317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.-M., Lee, P.-M., Hong, S.-W., Kim, S.-M. and Seong, W. (2005). Underwater navigation system based on inertial sensor and Doppler velocity log using indirect feedback Kalman filter. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 15(2), 8, 8895.Google Scholar
Liu, K., Zhao, W., Sun, B., Wu, P., Zhu, D. and Zhang, P. (2019). Application of updated Sage–Husa adaptive Kalman filter in the navigation of a translational sprinkler irrigation machine. Water, 11(6), 1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Fan, X., Lv, C., Wu, J., Li, L. and Ding, D. (2018). An innovative information fusion method with adaptive Kalman filter for integrated INS/GPS navigation of autonomous vehicles. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 100, 605616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamed, A. H. and Schwarz, K. P. (1999). Adaptive Kalman filtering for INS/GPS. Journal of Geodesy, 73(4), 193203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhappa, M., Mahindrakar, A. D., Guizilini, V. C., Terra, M. H. and Sabat, S. L. (2018). An improved Sage Husa adaptive robust Kalman Filter for de-noising the MEMS IMU drift signal. 2018 Indian Control Conference (ICC), 229234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhappa, M., Mahindrakar, A. D., Guizilini, V. C., Terra, M. H. and Sabat, S. L. (2020). MEMS-based IMU drift minimization: Sage Husa adaptive Robust Kalman filtering. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(1), 250260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhappa, M., Nayak, J., Terra, M. H. and Sabat, S. L. (2016). ARMA model based adaptive unscented fading Kalman filter for reducing drift of fiber optic gyroscope. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 251, 4251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raman, K. M. (1972). Approaches to adaptive filtering. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 17(5), 693698.Google Scholar
Sabet, M. T., Mohammadi Daniali, H., Fathi, A. and Alizadeh, E. (2018). A low-cost dead reckoning navigation system for an AUV using a robust AHRS: Design and experimental analysis. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 43(4), 927939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sage, A. P. and Husa, G. W. (1969). Algorithms for sequential adaptive estimation of prior statistics. 1969 IEEE Symposium on Adaptive Processes (8th) Decision and Control, 1969, 6161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, J., Xu, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, T. and Li, Y. (2016). FOG random Drift signal denoising based on the improved AR model and modified Sage-Husa adaptive Kalman filter. Sensors (Basel), 16(7), 1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tal, A., Klein, I. and Katz, R. (2017). Inertial navigation system/Doppler velocity log (INS/DVL) fusion with partial DVL measurements. Sensors (Basel), 17, 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J. (1999). Stochastic modeling for real-time kinematic GPS/GLONASS positioning. Navigation (Washington), 46(4), 297305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Liu, W., Ding, X., Lv, P., Feng, C., He, B. and Yan, T. (2018). USBL Positioning System Based Adaptive Kalman Filter in AUV. 2018 OCEANS-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans(OTO). IEEE, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Shen, T., Chen, X.-Y., Bu, L.-L. and Feng, N. (2019). Predictive adaptive Kalman filter and its application to INS/UWB-integrated human localization with missing UWB-based measurements. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 16(5), 604613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C., Shi, W. and Chen, W. (2018). Correlational inference-based adaptive unscented Kalman filter with application in GNSS/IMU-integrated navigation. GPS Solutions, 22(4), 100.Google Scholar
Yang, Y. and Xu, T. (2003). An adaptive Kalman filter based on Sage windowing weights and variance components. Journal of Navigation, 56(2), 231240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, Y., Xu, X., Li, Y. and Zhang, T. (2019). A hybrid IMM based INS/DVL integration solution for underwater vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(6), 54595470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yulong, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., Li, N. and Chambers, J. (2018). A novel adaptive Kalman filter with inaccurate process and measurement noise covariance matrices. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 63(2), 594601.Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Liu, L. and Zhang, L. (2020). Research on position correction method for AUV large depth navigation based on ranging positioning. Computer Communications, 150, 747756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, T., Tang, J., Qin, S. and Wang, X. (2019). Review of navigation and positioning of deep-sea manned submersibles. Journal of Navigation, 72, 10211034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar