Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T18:15:09.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Doppler enhanced TDCP algorithm based on terrain adaptive and robust Kalman filter using a stand-alone receiver

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2022

Kefan Shao
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Zengke Li*
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Zhehua Yang
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Zan Liu
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Yaowen Sun
Affiliation:
School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: zengkeli@yeah.net

Abstract

Time-differenced carrier phase (TDCP) is a commonly used method of precise velocimetry, but when the receiver is in a dynamic or complex observation environment, the estimation accuracy is reduced. Doppler velocimetry aims at estimating instantaneous velocity, and the accuracy is restricted by the accuracy of measurement. However, in such unfavourable cases, the Doppler measurement is more reliable than the carrier phase measurement. This paper derives the relationship between Doppler observation and TDCP observation, then proposes a Doppler enhanced TDCP algorithm, for the purpose of improving the velocity estimation accuracy in dynamic and complex observation environments. In addition, considering the error caused by the constant speed state update model in the robust Kalman filter (RKF), this paper designs a terrain adaptive and robust Kalman filter (TARKF). After three experimental tests, the improved TDCP algorithm can significantly increase the speed measurement accuracy to sub-metre per second, and the accuracy can be further improved after using TARKF.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Navigation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banville, S. and Langley, R. B. (2012). Cycle-Slip Correction for Single-Frequency PPP. Proceedings of the 25th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2012), Nashville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Cannon, M. E., Lachapelle, G., Szarmes, M. C., Hebert, J. M., Keith, J. and Jokerst, S. (1997). DGPS kinematic carrier phase signal simulation analysis for precise velocity and position determination. Navigation, 44, 231245.10.1002/j.2161-4296.1997.tb02345.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, G. (2014). Robust Kalman filtering based on Mahalanobis distance as outlier judging criterion. Journal of Geodesy, 88, 391401.10.1007/s00190-013-0690-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, K. W., Li, Y. H., Hsu, L. T. and Chu, F. Y. (2020). The design a TDCP-smoothed GNSS/odometer integration scheme with vehicular-motion constraint and robust regression. Remote Sensing, 12, 2550.10.3390/rs12162550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, W. and Wang, J. (2011). Precise velocity estimation with a stand-alone GPS receiver. Journal of Navigation, 64, 311325.10.1017/S0373463310000482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, S. L., Sun, W., Shi, J. B. and Ouyang, C. H. (2019). Analysis of Velocity Estimation Methods Based on BDS PPP. Proceedings of the China Satellite Navigation Conference, Singapore.10.1007/978-981-13-7751-8_37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freda, P., Angrisano, A., Gaglione, S. and Troisi, S. (2015). Time-differenced carrier phases technique for precise GNSS velocity estimation. GPS Solutions, 19, 335341.10.1007/s10291-014-0425-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, S. and Wang, J. (2012). Integrated GPS/INS navigation system with dual-rate Kalman filter. GPS Solutions, 16, 389404.10.1007/s10291-011-0240-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, H., Wang, J., Wang, J. and Tan, X. (2015). Performance analysis on carrier phase-based tightly-coupled GPS/BDS/INS integration in GNSS degraded and denied environments. Sensors, 15, 86858711.10.3390/s150408685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, H. Z., Wang, J., Wang, J. L. and Moraleda, A. H. (2017). Reliable partial ambiguity resolution for single-frequency GPS/BDS and INS integration. GPS Solutions, 21, 251264.10.1007/s10291-016-0519-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, K., Xu, T., Förste, C., Wang, Z., Zhao, Q. and Wei, Y. (2020) A Method to Correct the Raw Doppler Observations for GNSS Velocity Determination. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/1345_2020_119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, Y., Jia, X., Sun, X., Yan, S., Wu, S., Wang, S. and Gan, X. (2018). Doppler Cycle Slip Detection and Repair of Low Sampling Rate. Proceedings of the 2018 7th International Conference on Digital Home, Guilin, China.10.1109/ICDH.2018.00028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., Song, J., Kee, C. and Park, B. (2015). GPS cycle slip detection considering satellite geometry based on TDCP/INS integrated navigation. Sensors, 15, 2533625365.10.3390/s151025336CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, M.-S., Kim, B.-J., Kim, C.-I., Song, M.-H., Lee, G.-S. and Lim, J.-H. (2018). Vehicle Dynamics and Road Slope Estimation Based on Cascade Extended Kalman Filter. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Robotics (ICT-ROBOT), IEEE, Busan, South Korea.10.1109/ICT-ROBOT.2018.8549905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, H. K., Wang, J. L. and Rizos, C. (2003). Effective cycle slip detection and identification for high precision GPS/INS integrated systems. Journal of Navigation, 56, 475486.10.1017/S0373463303002443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X., Guo, J. and Zhou, L. (2016). Performance analysis of BDS/GPS kinematic vehicle positioning in various observation conditions. Sensor Review, 36, 249256.10.1108/SR-12-2015-0198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Yao, Y., Wang, J. and Gao, J. (2017a). Application of improved robust Kalman filter in data fusion for PPP/INS tightly coupled positioning system. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 24, 289301.10.1515/mms-2017-0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z. K., Gao, J. X., Wang, J. and Yao, Y. F. (2017b). PPP/INS tightly coupled navigation using adaptive federated filter. GPS Solutions, 21, 137148.10.1007/s10291-015-0511-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X., Li, X., Yuan, Y., Zhang, K., Zhang, X. and Wickert, J. (2018). Multi-GNSS phase delay estimation and PPP ambiguity resolution: GPS, BDS, GLONASS, Galileo. Journal of Geodesy, 92, 579608.10.1007/s00190-017-1081-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Gao, J., Zheng, N., Pan, C. and Zhao, L. (2020). A novel dual-domain filtering method to improve GNSS performance based on a dynamic model constructed by TDCP. IEEE Access, 8, 7971679723.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, Y., Gao, S., Zhong, Y., Hu, G. and Subic, A. (2016). Covariance matching based adaptive unscented Kalman filter for direct filtering in INS/GNSS integration. Acta Astronautica, 120, 171181.10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.12.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamed, A. H. and Schwarz, K. P. (1999). Adaptive Kalman filtering for INS/GPS. Journal of Geodesy, 73, 193203.10.1007/s001900050236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Y., Kim, M. and Lee, M. (2012). Development of Autonomous Vehicle Control Algorithm Based on DGPS(RTK) and Test Vehicle Performance Verification. Proceedings of the 2012 12th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, Jeju, South Korea.Google Scholar
Moore, M. and Wang, J. (2003). An extended dynamic model for kinematic positioning. Journal of Navigation, 56, 7988.10.1017/S0373463302002102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, N., Chang, G. and Gao, J. (2019). GNSS pseudorange and time-differenced carrier phase measurements least-squares fusion algorithm and steady performance theoretical analysis. Electronics Letters, 55, 12381240.10.1049/el.2019.2408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, S., Lachapelle, G. and Cannon, M. E. (1997). DGPS Kinematic Carrier Phase Signal Simulation Analysis in the Velocity Domain. Proceedings of the 10th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1997), Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
Soon, B. K. H., Scheding, S., Lee, H.-K., Lee, H.-K. and Durrant-Whyte, H. (2008). An approach to aid INS using time-differenced GPS carrier phase (TDCP) measurements. GPS Solutions, 12, 261271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, X., Zhang, X., Zhu, F., Wang, F. and Teng, W. (2018). Precise displacement estimation from time-differenced carrier phase to improve PDR performance. IEEE Sensors Journal, 18, 82388246.10.1109/JSEN.2018.2867225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Graas, F. and Soloviev, A. (2004). Precise velocity estimation using a stand-alone GPS receiver. Navigation, Journal of The Institute of Navigation, 51, 283292.10.1002/j.2161-4296.2004.tb00359.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q. and Xu, T. (2011). Combining GPS carrier phase and Doppler observations for precise velocity determination. Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 54, 10221028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Tu, R., Gao, Y., Zhang, R., Fan, L., Zhang, P., Han, J. and Lu, X. (2019). Velocity estimations by combining time-differenced GPS and Doppler observations. Measurement Science and Technology, 30, 125003.10.1088/1361-6501/ab375fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G., Xu, X., Wang, J. and Zhu, Y. (2020). An enhanced INS/GNSS tightly coupled navigation system using time-differenced carrier phase measurement. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 69, 52085218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendel, J., Meister, O., Monikes, R. and Trommer, G. F. (2006). Time-Differenced Carrier Phase Measurements for Tightly Coupled GPS/INS Integration. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ION Position, Location, and Navigation Symposium, Coronado, CA.Google Scholar
Yang, Y. X. (2001). Some numerical prediction methods for the wind speed in the sea based on ERS-1 scatterometer wind data. Survey Review, 36, 121131.10.1179/sre.2001.36.280.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S., Li, L. L., Liu, J. B., Chen, Q. S., Ding, X. W., Sun, H. X., Wu, Y., Ren, C. H. and Hu, N. (2019). Effective cycle slip detection and repair for PPP/INS integrated systems. Sensors, 19, 502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X. H., Zhu, F., Zhang, Y. X., Mohamed, F. and Zhou, W. X. (2019). The improvement in integer ambiguity resolution with INS aiding for kinematic precise point positioning. Journal of Geodesy, 93, 9931010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Chang, G., Chen, C., Zhang, S. and Zhu, T. (2020). GNSS real-time instantaneous velocimetry based on moving-window polynomial modelling. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 14, 11501158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Chang, G., Chen, C., Zhang, S. and Zhu, T. (2021). Adaptive GNSS velocimetry combining Doppler and carrier phase measurements based on online variance component estimation. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21, 32783288.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2017). Applying time-differenced carrier phase in nondifferential GPS/IMU tightly coupled navigation systems to improve the positioning performance. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66, 9921003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J., Hernandez-Pajares, M., Li, Z., Wang, L. and Yuan, H. (2020). High-rate Doppler-aided cycle slip detection and repair method for low-cost single-frequency receivers. GPS Solutions, 24, 80.Google Scholar
Zheng, K. and Tang, L. (2016). Performance assessment of BDS and GPS/BDS velocity estimation with stand-alone receiver. Journal of Navigation, 69, 869882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, F., Dong, D. N., Li, W. W., Jiang, X. Y., Wickert, J. and Schuh, H. (2018). GAMP: An open-source software of multi-GNSS precise point positioning using undifferenced and uncombined observations. GPS Solutions, 22, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar