Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:53:45.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

# New Formulae for Combined Spherical Triangles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2018

## Abstract

Spherical trigonometry formulae are widely adopted to solve various navigation problems. However, these formulae only express the relationships between the sides and angles of a single spherical triangle. In fact, many problems may involve different types of spherical shapes. If we can develop the different formulae for specific spherical shapes, it will help us solve these problems directly. Thus, we propose two types of formulae for combined spherical triangles. The first set are the formulae of the divided spherical triangle, and the second set are the formulae of the spherical quadrilateral. By applying the formulae of the divided spherical triangle, waypoints on a great circle track can be obtained directly without finding the initial great circle course angle in advance. By applying the formulae of the spherical quadrilateral, the astronomical vessel position can be yielded directly from two celestial bodies, and the calculation process concept is easier to comprehend. The formulae we propose can not only be directly used to solve corresponding problems, but also expand the spherical trigonometry research field.

## Keywords

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , March 2019 , pp. 503 - 512

## Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

## References

#### REFERENCES

Bowditch, N. (2017). The American Practical Navigator, 2017 Edition, Volume I. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
Chen, C.L. (2016). A Systematic Approach for Solving the Great Circle Track Problems Based on Vector Algebra. Polish Maritime Research, 23, 313.Google Scholar
Chen, C.L., Hsieh, T.H. and Hsu, T.P. (2015). A Novel Approach to Solve the Great Circle Track Based on Rotation Transformation. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 23, 1320.Google Scholar
Chen, C.L., Liu, P.F. and Gong, W.T. (2014). A Simple Approach to Great Circle Sailing: the COFI Method. The Journal of Navigation, 67, 403418.Google Scholar
Chiesa, A. and Chiesa, R. (1990). A Mathematical Method of Obtaining an Astronomical Vessel Position. The Journal of Navigation, 43, 125129.Google Scholar
Clough-Smith, J.H. (1978). An Introduction to Spherical Trigonometry. Brown, Son & Ferguson, Ltd.Google Scholar
Cutler, T.J. (2004). Dutton's Nautical Navigation, Fifteenth Edition. Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar
Gery, S.W. (1997). The Direct Fix of Latitude and Longitude from Two Observed Altitudes. NAVIGATION: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, 44, 1523.Google Scholar
Green, R.M. (1985). Spherical Astronomy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holm, R.J. (1972). Great Circle Waypoints for Inertial Equipped Aircraft. NAVIGATION: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, 19(2), 191194.Google Scholar
Hsu, T.P., Chen, C.L. and Chang, J.R. (2005). New Computational Methods for Solving Problems of the Astronomical Vessel Position. The Journal of Navigation, 58, 315335.Google Scholar
MathWorld. (1999). Spherical Trigonometry. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/. Accessed 19 August 2018.Google Scholar
Miller, A.R., Moskowitz, I.S. and Simmen, J. (1991). Traveling on the Curved Earth. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 38, 7178.Google Scholar
Murray, D.A. (1908). Spherical Trigonometry: for Colleges and Secondary Schools. Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Nastro, V. and Tancredi, U. (2010). Great Circle Navigation with Vectorial Methods. The Journal of Navigation, 63, 557563.Google Scholar
Pepperday, M. (1992). The ‘Two-body Problem’ at Sea. The Journal of Navigation, 45, 138142.Google Scholar