Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:37:26.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistics dealing with Hereditary Insanity, based on upwards of a Thousand Gases occurring in the Essex County Asylum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

John Turner
John Turner*
Affiliation:
Senior Assistant Medical Officer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fifty years ago Baillarger† showed from a study of 453 cases that insanity is one third more frequently transmitted from the mothers to the children than from the fathers, and that in the case of sons the transmission is as frequently from one parent as from the other, and in the case of daughters the disposition to insanity is inherited twice as frequently from the mother as from the father. Leubuscher† apparently referring to some later statistics of Baillarger's dealing with 600 cases, found that:—

Summary

Direct inheritance.—(a) Taking all classes of insanity, acquired and congenital, we find that whilst the insane father transmits his mental instability to a greater number of offspring than the insane mother, it is on the daughters that it mostly falls, and where the mother is insane the influence is still more marked in the direction of the daughters; so that whichever parent is insane, more daughters ultimately become insane than sons.

(β) The number of insane mothers is very considerably greater than insane fathers.

Reversional and collateral inheritance.—(a) In both sexes the stronger hereditary influence comes through the maternal branch of the family.

(β) The males have the larger number of brothers insane, the females the larger number of sisters.

Bearing in mind the suggestions previously advanced as to the greater amount of stress that the female is physiologically exposed to, I am inclined to think that the results arrived at in Table III. give us a correct idea concerning the transmission of mental instability.

In this series extraneous circumstances have been excluded to a large extent, and the results are in harmony with Darwin's Law of Heredity. But larger numbers will have to be dealt with before any positive conclusion can be arrived at. Where we deal with all classes, as in Table I., these results are liable to be masked to a certain extent by other causes already mentioned. If such be the case the discrepancy between the two tables will serve to give us an idea of the marked influence that extraneous circumstances have in determining actual insanity in those predisposed to it.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 42 , Issue 178 , July 1896 , pp. 493 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1896

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

∗ Serassi, , “Vita,” p. 247.Google Scholar

† “Recherche Stat. sur l'Hérédité de la Folie,” Ann. Med. Psych., 1844. Quoted by Greisinger (N. Syd. Soc. Transi., p. 154).Google Scholar

‡ Journ. Psych. Med., Vol. i., p. 264.Google Scholar

∗ Journ. Psych. Med., Vol. i., p. 91.Google Scholar

∗ Lectures on Mental Diseases, 3rd edition, p. 119.Google Scholar

† Cumberland and Westmorland Asylum Report, 1890.Google Scholar

∗ Referring to Pennsylvania Asylums Report, 1894. Kankakee Eastern Hospital, 1892. Buffalo State Hospital, 1891. Willard State Hospital, 1892. New York State, 1894.Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.