Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:35:33.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychological Effects of Centrally Acting Drugs in Man

Effects of Chlorpromazine and Secobarbital on Visual and Motor Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Conan Kornetsky
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Clinical Science, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland
Ogretta Humphries
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Clinical Science, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland

Extract

In a previous study (Kornetsky, Humphries and Evarts, 1957) it was found that the impairment of a variety of psychological processes caused by 200 mg. of chlorpromazine was not significantly less than the impairment produced by 200 mg. of secobarbital. It was also shown that the effects of drugs on psychological performance in man are related not only to the specific pharmacological activity of the drug, but also to the specific reactivity of the subject. It appeared that there was something unique to the individual which accounted for a significant portion of the effect of a drug. The present study was designed to extend these observations by reducing the number of drugs tested (in the previous study four drugs were used) and increasing the number of times a subject received each drug. It was hoped that this would give a better estimate of the effect of a specific dose of a specific drug and thus decrease the error of measurement and increase the reliability of the correlation between drugs.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1958 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dunnett, C. W., J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 1955, 50, 1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L., Statistical Analysis, 1946. New York: Rinehart and Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Kornetsky, C., and Humphries, O., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1957, 77, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iidem and Evarts, E. V., ibid., 1957, 77, 318.Google Scholar
Kovitz, B., Carter, J. T., and Addison, W. P., ibid., 1955, 74, 467.Google Scholar
Lasagna, L., Mosteller, F., von Felsinger, J. M., and Beecher, H. K., Amer. J. Med., 1954, 16, 770.Google Scholar
Lehmann, H. E., and Hanrahan, G. E., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1954, 71, 227.Google Scholar
Mood, A., Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, 1950. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 398.Google Scholar
Scheffé, H., Biometrika., 1953, 40, 87.Google Scholar
Shaten, L., Rockmore, L., and Funk, I. C., Psychiat. Quart., 1956, 30, 402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D., The Measurement of Adult Intelligence, 1944. 3rd edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Company.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.