Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:01:24.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal Design of Side-Inlet/Side-Outlet Expansion Mufflers with Open-Ended Perforated Tubes Using Simulated Annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

M.-C. Chiu  and
Y.-C. Chang
M.-C. Chiu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Changhua, Taiwan 51060, R.O.C.
Y.-C. Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tatung University, Taipei, Taiwan 10452, R.O.C.
*
*Associate Professor, corresponding author
Get access

Abstract

Research on new techniques of multi-chamber mufflers equipped with a side inlet and internal nonperforated intruding tubes has been discussed in recent literature; however, the research work of multichamber mufflers in conjunction with side inlet and open-ended perforated intruding tubes which may efficiently increase the acoustical performance has been neglected. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to optimize the best design shape of multi-chamber side mufflers with open-ended perforated intruding tubes within a limited space.

In this paper, the four-pole system matrix in evaluating the acoustic performance is also deduced in conjunction with a simulated algorithm (SA). Results reveal that the maximum sound transmission loss (STL) is precisely located at the desired target tone. In addition, the acoustical performance of mufflers conjugated with perforated intruding tubes is superior to those equipped with non-perforated tubes. Additionally, the noise reduction ability for a three-chamber side muffler with a non-perforated intruding tube and a two-chamber side muffler with perforated intruding tubes are equivalent. Moreover, mufflers with more chambers will increase the acoustic performance for both pure tone and broadband noise.

Keywords

Open-ended perforated intruding tubeDecoupled numerical methodSpace constraintsSimulated annealing algorithm.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 533 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Magrab, E. B., Environmental Noise Control, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1975).Google Scholar
2.Munjal, M. L., “Plane Wave Analysis of Side Inlet/outlet Chamber Mufflers withMean Flow,” Applied Acoustics, 52, pp. 16–175 (1997).Google Scholar
3.Yeh, L. J., Chang, Y. C., Chiu, M. C. and Lai, G. J., “Computer-aided Optimal Designof a Single-chamber Muffler with Side Inlet/outlet under Space Constraints,” Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 11, pp. 1–8 (2003).Google Scholar
4.Chang, Y. C., Yeh, L. J. and Chiu, M. C., “Numerical Studies on Constrained Venting System with Side Inlet/outlet Mufflers by GA Optimization,” Acta Acustica, 90, pp. 1–114 (2004).Google Scholar
5.Chiu, M. C., ‘Shape Optimization of Double-chamber Side Mufflers with Extended Tube by Using Four-pole Matrix and Simulated Annealing Method,” Journal of Mechanics, 24, pp. 31–43 (2008).Google Scholar
6.Chang, Y. C., Yeh, L. J. and Chiu, M. C., “GA Optimization on Single-chamber Muffler Hybridized with Extended Tube under Space Constraints,” Archives of Acoustics, 29, pp. 577–596 (2004).Google Scholar
7.Sullivan, J. W. and Crocker, M. J., “Analysis of Concentric Tube Resonators Having Unpartitioned Cavities,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, pp. 207–215 (1978).Google Scholar
8.Sullivan, J. W., “A Method of Modeling Perforated Tube Muffler Components I: Theory,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, pp. 772–778 (1979).Google Scholar
9.Sullivan, J. W., “A Method of Modeling Perforated Tube Muffler Components II: Theory,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, pp. 779–788 (1979).Google Scholar
10.Sathyanarayana, Y. and Munjal, M. L., “A Hybrid Approach for Aeroacoustic Analysis of the Engine Exhaust System,” Applied Acoustics, 60, pp. 42–450 (2000).Google Scholar
11.Thawani, P. T. and Jayaraman, K., “Modeling and Applications of Straight-through Resonators,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, pp. 1387–1389 (1983).Google Scholar
12.Rao, K. N. and Munjal, M. L., “Experimental Evaluation of Impedance of Perforates with Grazing Flow,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 108, pp. 283–295 (1986).Google Scholar
13.Munjal, M. L., Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers with Application to Exhaust and Ventilation System Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1987).Google Scholar
14.Peat, K. S., “A Numerical Decoupling Analysis of Perforated Pipe Silencer Elements,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 123, pp. 199–212 (1988).Google Scholar
15.Wang, C. N., “The Application of Boundary Element Method in the Noise Reduction Analysis for the Automotive Mufflers,” Doctor Thesis, Taiwan University (1992).Google Scholar
16.Chiu, M. C., Yeh, L. J., Chang, Y. C. and Lan, T. S., “Shape Optimization of Single-chamber Mufflers with Side Inlet/outlet by Using Boundary Element Method, Mathematic Gradient Method and Genetic Algorithm,” Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering, 12, pp. 8–98 (2009).Google Scholar
17.Chiu, M. C., “SA Optimization on Multi-chamber Mufflers Hybridized with Perforated Plug-inlet under Space Constraints,” Achives of Acoustics, 34, pp. 30–343 (2009).Google Scholar
18.Wang, C. N., “A Numerical Scheme for the Analysis of Perforated Intruding Tube Muffler Components,” Applied Acoustics, 44, pp. 27–286 (1995).Google Scholar
19.Rardin, R. L., Optimization in Operations Research, Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1998).Google Scholar
20.Laurence, W., Integer Programming, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1998).Google Scholar
21.Vanderplaats, N. G., Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York (1984).Google Scholar
22.Weeber, K., Ratnajeevan, S. and Hoole, H., “Geometric Parametrization and Constrained Optimization Techniques in the Design of Salient Pole Synchronous Machines,” IEEE Transaction on Magnetics, 28, pp. 1948–1960 (1992).Google Scholar
23.Reklaitis, G. V., Ravindran, A. and Ragsdell, K. M., “Engineering Optimization: Method and Applications,” Wiley, New York (1984).Google Scholar
24.Glover, F., “Heuristics for Inter Programming Using Surrogate Constraints,” Decision Sciences, 8, pp. 156–166 (1977).Google Scholar
25.Chang, Y. C., Yeh, L. J., Chiu, M. C. and Lai, G. J., “Shape Optimization on Constrained Single-layer Sound Absorber by Using GA Method and Mathematical Gradient Methods,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 286, pp. 941–961 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Metropolis, A., Rosenbluth, W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, H. and Teller, E., “Equation of Static Calculations by Fast Computing Machines,” Journal of Chemical Physics, 21, pp. 1087–1092 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D. and Vecchi, M. P., “Optimization by Simulated Annealing,” Science, 220, pp. 671–680 (1983).Google Scholar
28.Chang, Y. C. and Chiu, M. C., “The Optimal Design of Multi-Chamber Side Mufflers Equipped with Perforated Cross-Flow Tubes and Intruding Tubes Using Simulated Annealing,” Journal of Mechanics, 27, pp. 321–335 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar