No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Effects of Fuel Impingement-Cooling on the Combustion Flow in a Small Bipropellant Liquid Rocket Thruster
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2015
Abstract
In the present study, a three-dimensional computer code, based on the computer software KIVA-3, was developed for the combustion-flow simulation of a bipropellant liquid rocket thruster. A jets-impingement model is proposed for the unlike-doublet jet impingement issue. The computer code is employed to simulate a small bipropellant liquid rocket engine installed with three unlike-doublet injectors of NTO and MMH as well as six fuel injectors injecting MMH toward the combustor wall for cooling. Effects of the fuel-injection cooling on the combustion flow, combustion efficiency, and wall temperature were investigated. The results obtained from the present study show that under the present injector configuration and a constant total fuel-flow rate, higher cooling-fuel ratios make the atomized mixing flow of NTO and MMH shift toward the combustor wall, resulting in lower combustion efficiency and chamber pressure; however, low cooling-fuel ratios are unable to keep the wall-temperature sufficiently low. To overcome this issue, the proposed three-dimensional computer code calculates/locates the optimal cooling-fuel ratio that bears high combustion efficiency for a bipropellant liquid rocket combustor while keeping the chamber wall sufficiently cool.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2014
References
REFERENCES
1.Liang, P.Y., Fisher, S. and Chang, Y.M., “Comprehensive Modeling of a Liquid Rocket Combustion Chamber,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2, pp. 97–104 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Liang, P.Y., Jensen, R.J. and Chang, Y.M., “Numerical Analysis of SSME Preburner Injector Atomization and Combustion Process,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 3, pp. 508–104 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cloutman, L.C., Dukowicz, J.K., Ramshaw, J.D. and Amsden, A.A., CONCHAS-SPRAY: A Computer Code for Reactive Flows with Fuel Sprays, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-9294-MS (1982).Google Scholar
4.Jiang, T.L. and Chiu, H.H., “Bipropellant Combustion in a Liquid Rocket Combustion Chamber,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 8, pp. 995–1003 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Larosiliere, L.M. and Jeng, S.M., “Bipropellant Spray Combustion Modeling in Small Rocket Engines,” AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE, 27th Joint Propulsion Conference (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Jiang, T.L., Chiang, W.T. and Jang, S.D., “Numerical Simulation of Variable Thrust Engine Combustion Chamber,” AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE, 28th Joint Propulsion Conference (1992).Google Scholar
7.Jiang, T.L., Chiang, W.T. and Jang, S.D., “Combustion Performance of a Bipropellant Liquid Rocket Engine Combustor with Fuel-impingement Cooling,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 11, pp. 570–572 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Knab, O., Preclik, D. and Estublier, D., “Flow Field Prediction within Liquid Film Cooled Combustion Chamber of Storable Bipropellant Rocket Engines,” AIAA-98-3370, AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE, 34th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Knab, O., Frohlich, A. and Wennerberg, D., “Design Support for Advanced Storable Propellant Engines by ROCFLAM Analyses,” AIAA-99-2459, AI-AA/SAE/ASME/ASEE, 35th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (1999).Google Scholar
10.Purohit, G.P., Donatelli, P.A., Ellison, J.R. and Dhir, V.K., “Transient Thermal Model of a Film-Cooled Bipropellant Thruster,” AIAA-2000-1072, 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (2000).Google Scholar
11.Purohit, G.P., Donatelli, P.A., Ellison, J.R. and Dhir, V.K., “Parametric Examination of Propellant Temperature and Pressure Effects on Transient Thermal Response of a Radiation-Cooled Bipropellant Thruster,” AIAA-2000-1071, 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (2000).Google Scholar
12.Zhang, H., Tao, W., He, Y. and Zhang, W., “Numerical Study of Liquid Film Cooling in a Rocket Combustion Chamber,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 49, pp. 349–358 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Shine, S., Kumar, S. and Suresh, B., “A New Generalized Model for Liquid Film Cooling in Rocket Combustion Chambers,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 55, pp. 5065–5075 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Amsden, A.A., KIVA-3: A KIVA Program with Block-Structured Mesh for Complex Geometries, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-12503-MS (1993).Google Scholar
15.Amsden, A.A., O’Rourke, P.J. and Butler, T.D., KIVA-II: A Computer Program for Chemically Reactive Flows with Sprays, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-11560-MS (1989).Google Scholar
16.Yen, R.H. and Ko, T.H., “Effect of Side-Inlet Angle in a Three-Dimension Side-Dump Combustor,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 9, pp. 686–693 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Sloan, D.G., Smith, P.J. and Smoot, L.D., “Modeling of Swirling in Turbulent Flow Systems,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 12, pp. 163–250 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B., “The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3, pp. 269–289 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Lai, W.H., Jiang, T.L. and Huang, W., “Characteristic Study on the Like-doublet Impinging Jets Atomization,” Atomization and Sprays, 9, pp. 177–189 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Hirt, C.W., Amsden, A.A. and Cook, J.L., “An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Computing Method for All Flow Speeds,” Journal of Computational Physics, 14, pp. 227–253 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Pracht, W.E., “Calculating Three-Dimensional Fluid Flows at All Speeds with an Eulerian-Lagrangian Computing Mesh,” Journal of Computational Physics, 17, pp. 103–233 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Yuan, T. and Chen, C., “Observation of the Spray Phenomena of Unlike-Doublet Impinging Jets,” Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, US (2004).Google Scholar