Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:39:27.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tribological properties of quasicrystalline coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

S.S. Kang ,
J.M. Dubois  and
J. von Stebut
S.S. Kang
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Science et Génie des Matériaux Métalliques (CNRS URA 159), Ecole des Mines, Parc de Saurupt, F-54042 Nancy, France
J.M. Dubois
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Science et Génie des Matériaux Métalliques (CNRS URA 159), Ecole des Mines, Parc de Saurupt, F-54042 Nancy, France
J. von Stebut
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Science et Génie des Surfaces (CNRS URA 1402), Ecole des Mines, Parc de Saurupt, F-54042 Nancy, France
Get access

Abstract

Coatings of three different compositions (Al65Cu20Fe15, Al64Cu18Fe8Cr8, and Al67Cu9Fe10.5Cr10.5Si3) were realized by various thermal deposition techniques. They were studied in the as-deposited state and after annealing. In view of potential applications, these quasicrystalline coatings were examined from the point of view of tribology: friction and wear. Some basic components of friction such as roughness, plowing, and adhesion have been studied in scratch testing. The friction resistance of the coating is strongly dependent on its inherent porosity, hardness, and thickness. The damage of the coatings is essentially brittle though some ductile behavior is observed. Static indentation hardness is in the range 500–600 HV0.03 (5–6 GPa), whereas the scratch hardness varies from 1.4 to 2.4 GPa depending on the percentage of porosity. Friction coefficients (measured at constant load of 20 N) were found to be typically 0.07 and 0.20 for diamond (tip radius R = 0.79 mm) and AISI 52100 (radius R = 0.79 mm) indenters, respectively.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 8 , Issue 10 , October 1993 , pp. 2471 - 2481
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D., and Cahn, J. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Bak, P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 861 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3M. de Boissieu, Janot, C., and Dubois, J. M., Phys. Cond. Matter. 2, 2499 (1990).Google Scholar
4Klein, T., Gozlan, A., Berger, C., Cyrot-Lackmann, F., Calvayrac, Y., and Quivy, A., Europhys. Lett. 13 (2), 129 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Gozlan, G., Berger, C., Fourcaudot, G., Omari, R., Lasjaunias, J. C., and Prejean, J. J., Phys. Rev. B 44–1, 101 (1991).Google Scholar
6Sainfort, P., Dubost, B., and Dubus, A., C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. II, 301, 689 (1985).Google Scholar
7Sainfort, P. and Dubost, B., in Quasicrystalline Materials, edited by Janot, C. and Dubois, J. M. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988), p. 361.Google Scholar
8Sidhom, H. and Portier, R., Philos. Mag. Lett. 59, 131 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Shibuya, T., Hashimoto, T., and Takeuchi, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, L349 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Bresson, L. and Gratias, D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 153–154, 468 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Kang, S. S. and Dubois, J. M., Philos. Mag. B (1992).Google Scholar
12Dubois, J. M., Kang, S. S., and von Stebut, J., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 10, 537 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Wittmann, R., Urban, K., Schandl, M., and Hornbogen, E., J. Mater. Res. 6, 1165 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Advanced Materials and Processes 6, 6 (1991).Google Scholar
15Thermal Spraying Practice, Theory and Application (American Welding Society, Miami, FL, 1978); Ducos, M., Traitements de Surface 546, 3 (1984).Google Scholar
16Two diamond indenters with different tip radii were used because, firstly, the scratch track made by indenter Dl cannot be distinguished from the coating surface roughness due to insufficient relief of the scratch track and secondly, because the crack density or equivalently, the scratch hardness can be more easily detemined by using the indenter D2. Conversely, data measured with indenter Dl are directly comparable with those of indenterB, yet preserving the same contact geometry.Google Scholar
17von Stebut, J., First Int. Conf. Plasma Surface Eng., edited by Broszeit, E., Münz, N.D., Oechsner, H., Rie, K. T., and Wolf, G. K. (DGM Informations Gesellschaft Verlag, Oberursel, 1989).Google Scholar
18Dong, C. and Dubois, J. M., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 1647 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Tsai, A. P., Inoue, A., and Matsumoto, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26, L1505 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Dong, C., Dubois, J. M., de Boissieu, M., and Janot, C., J. Phys.: Cond. Matter 2, 6339 (1990).Google Scholar
21Black, P. J., Acta Crystallogr. 8, 43 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Dong, C., Dubois, J. M., Kang, S. S., and Audier, M., Philos. Mag. 65, 107 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Rézakhanlou, R. and von Stebut, J., in Mechanics of Coatings, edited by Dowson, D., Taylor, G. M., and Godet, M., Tribology Series 17 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990), p. 183.Google Scholar
24Shaw, M. C., Wear 43, 263 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Principles ofTribology, edited by Hailing, J. (Tinling Ltd., Prescot, Merseyside, Great Britain, 1975), p. 40.Google Scholar
26Bowden, F. P. and Tabor, D., The Friction and Lubrication of Solids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1954).Google Scholar
27Bückle, H., in The Science of Hardness Testing and Its Research Application, edited by Westbrook, J.W. and Conrad, H. (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1973), p. 453.Google Scholar
28Rézakhanlou, R., Billard, A., Foos, M., Frantz, C., and von, J., Stebut, Surf. Coatings Technol. 43, 907 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Saka, N., Fundamentals of Tribology, edited by Suh, N. P. and Saka, N. (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978), p. 135.Google Scholar
30Suh, N. P., Sin, H. C., and Sada, N., Fundamentals of Tribology, edited by Suh, N. P. and Saka, N. (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978), p. 493.Google Scholar
31Rabinowicz, E., Friction and Wear ofMaterials (John Wiley, New York, 1965), Vol. 66, p. 68.Google Scholar
32Gilroy, D. R. and Hirst, W., Brit. J. Appl. Phys. (J. Phys. D) 2–2, 1784 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Hamilton, G. M. and Goodman, L. E., J. Appl. Mech. 33, 371 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Buckley, D. H., Fundamentals of Tribology, edited by Suh, N. P. and Saka, N. (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978), p. 173.Google Scholar
35Tsukizoe, T., Fundamentals ofTribology, edited by Suh, N. P. and Saka, N. (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978), p. 53.Google Scholar
36µp = tan α/π is obtained with A‖ = h(L/2)[see Fig. 9(a)] and A1 = π(L/2)2 in Eq. (8).Google Scholar
37Yamamoto, A. and Ishihara, K. N., Acta Crystallogr. A 44, 707 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Cahn, J. W., Shechtman, D., and Gratias, D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 13 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar