Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:34:20.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Size distribution of ultrafine particles in KDP aqueous solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Li Lian
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Gakushuin University, Mejiro 1-5-1, Toshimaku, Tokyo, 171, Japan
Lu Taijing
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 0511, Singapore
Yasushi Zaizu
Affiliation:
Fuji Electric Co., Ltd, Nakasaka 2-2-1, Yokotsuka-shi, Kanagawa, 240-01, Japan
T. Ogawa
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Gakushuin University, Mejiro 1-5-1, Toshimaku, Tokyo, 171, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Quantitative and qualitative investigations on the size distribution of ultrafine particles in KDP solutions were performed by a laser light scanning particle counter and by comparing with scattering polystyrene particles of standard size. The ultrafine particles are of a size distribution from <70 nm to 2000 nm, and the density of the particles sharply decreased with increasing particle size. Most of them were smaller than 100 nm, and almost no particles were >1000 nm. The size of the visual particles, which are distinguished individually by a laser light-scattering technique,3 was estimated in the size range from 200 nm to 1000 nm. The reliability of the results was evaluated.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Chernov, A. A., Modern Crystallography III, Crystal Growth, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, edited by Queisser, H-J. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, 1984).Google Scholar
2.Morphology and Growth Units of Crystals, edited by I. Sunagawa (Terra Science Publishing Company, Tokyo, 1991).Google Scholar
3.Lian, Li, Tiajing, Lu, Sakai, K., and Ogawa, T., J. Mater. Res. 7, 3275 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Cornillault, J., Appl. Opt. 11, 265 (1972).Google Scholar
5.Nakadate, S., Hamanaka, K., and Saito, H., Laser Sci. Prog. Rep. IPCR 5, 255 (1983).Google Scholar
6.Berne, B. J. and Pecora, R., Dynamic Light Scattering with Application to Chemistry, Biology and Physics (John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1976).Google Scholar
7.Kato, K., Nakamura, K., Kawaguchi, M., and Takahashi, T., Polymer J. 13, 1037 (1981).Google Scholar
8.Muly, E. C. and Frock, H. N., Opt. Eng. 19. 861 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Zaizu, Y. and Manabe, T., Oyobutsuri (in Japanese) 61, 604 (1992).Google Scholar
10.Taijing, Lu, Toyoda, K., Nango, N., and Ogawa, T., J. Cryst. Growth 108, 482 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Van de Hulst, H. C., Light Scattering by Small Particle (Dover, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
12.Wickramasinghe, N. C., Light Scattering Functions of Small Particles (Hilger, Bristol, 1973).Google Scholar