Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:48:27.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Significant reduction in thermal expansion of a low-carbon steel sheet by depositing a Fe–Ni alloy thin film

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Sang Sub Kim  and
Yong Bum Park
Sang Sub Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Research and Development Center for Automobile's Parts and Materials, Sunchon National University, Sunchon 540-742, Korea
Yong Bum Park
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Research and Development Center for Automobile's Parts and Materials, Sunchon National University, Sunchon 540-742, Korea
Get access

Extract

A 3-μm-thick Fe–Ni alloy thin film was deposited on a 0.2-mm-thick low-carbon steel substrate by radio-frequency magnetron sputtering, and the properties of the film were investigated. The film exhibits a columnar growth structure and a fiber texture with the relationship of (110)film//(111)substrate. A thermal cycle test showed good adhesion between the film and the substrate. Most importantly, the Fe–Ni alloy deposition results in a significant reduction in thermal expansion of the whole specimen. These results suggest that a properly deposited Fe–Ni alloy film could be applied to a low-carbon steel sheet to significantly reduce its thermal expansion. Such reduced thermal expansion would enhance the image resolution of a shadow mask made of a low-carbon steel sheet.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 2000 , pp. 14 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Gallas, M.R., Amaral, L., and da Jornada, J.A.H., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 131 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Schroter, M., Ebert, H., Akai, H., Entel, P., Hoffmann, E., and Reddy, G.G., Phys. Rev. B 52, 188 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ono, F., Maeta, H., and Bang, L., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140–144, 247 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wohlfarth, E.P., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 10, 120 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Abrikosov, I.A., Eriksson, O., Soderlind, P., Skriver, H.L., and Johansson, B., Phys. Rev. B 51, 1058 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kussman, A. and Jessen, K., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 17, 136 (1962).Google Scholar