Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T07:12:40.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modulated microwave absorption in single crystal Bi–Sr–Ca–Cu–O

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

R.S. Rubins ,
Z. Trybula ,
S. Waplak ,
John E. Drumheller ,
Donglu Shi  and
Ming Xu
R.S. Rubins
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Box 19059, Arlington, Texas 76017, and Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
Z. Trybula*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
S. Waplak*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
John E. Drumheller
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
Donglu Shi
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Ming Xu
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
*
a)On leave from the Institute of Molecular Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
a)On leave from the Institute of Molecular Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Get access

Abstract

Modulated microwave absorption measurements at 9.3 GHz were made on the low field absorption observed in the superconducting phase of Bi–Sr–Ca–Cu–O. The line intensity observed with a low modulation amplitude of 50 mOe showed a maximum between 70 K and 80 K and dropped to zero near 95 K. With a modulation amplitude of 10 Oe, an additional broad line absorption was observed above 88 K, peaking in intensity near 95 K, and disappearing above 100 K. Hysteresis, associated with flux trapping, occurred when the maximum field Hmax in a sweep cycle exceeded a critical value H*(T), which varied from about 7 Oe at 59 K to 1 Oe at 82 K. For Hmax > H*, the hysteresis splitting at first varied linearly with (Hmax – H*), later saturating at a value δHmax(T). Above 70 K, the relationship δHmax = b(T0 – T) was obeyed with T0 = 92.3 K and b· = −0.3 Oe/K for H perpendicular and b· = −0.23 Oe/K for H parallel to the c-axis.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , April 1992 , pp. 837 - 843
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Blazey, K.W., Portis, A.M., Muller, K.A., and Holtzberg, F.H., Europhys. Lett. 6, 457 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Blazey, K. W., Portis, A. M., Muller, K. A., Bednorz, J. G., and Holtzberg, F. H., Physica C 153–55, 56 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Dulčić, A., Crepeau, R.H., and Freed, J.H., Phys. Rev. B 38, 5002 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dulčić, A., Crepeau, R. H., and Freed, J. H., Phys. Rev. B 39, 4249 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Dulčić, A., Crepeau, R. H., Freed, J.H., Schneemeyer, L.F., and Waszczak, J. V., Phys. Rev. B 42, 2155 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Deutscher, G. and Müller, K.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1745 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Portis, A.M., Blazey, K.W., Muller, K.A., and Bednorz, J.G., Europhys. Lett. 5, 467 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Blazey, K. W., Portis, A. M., and Bednorz, J. G., Solid State Commun. 65, 1153 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Stalder, M., Stefanicki, G., Warden, M., Portis, A.M., and Waldner, F., Physica C 153–155, 659 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Pozek, M., Dulčić, A., and Rakvin, B., Solid State Commun. 70, 990 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Dulčić, A., Rakvin, B., and Pozek, M., Europhys. Lett. 10, 593 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. See, for example, Iqbal, Z., Eckhardt, H., Reidinger, F., Bose, A., Barry, J. C., and Ramakrishna, B. L., Phys. Rev. B 38, 859 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Lin, J. J., Benitez, E. L., Poon, S. J., Subramanian, M. A., Gopalakrishnan, J., and Sleight, A. W., Phys. Rev. B 38, 5095 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Gammel, P. L., Schneemeyer, L. F., Waszczak, J.V., and Bishop, D.J, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1666 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Ota, S. B., Rose, R.A., Jayaram, B., DeGroot, P.A.J., and Lanchester, P.C, Physica C 157, 520 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Biggs, B.D., Kunchur, M.N., Lin, J.J., Poon, S.J., Askew, T.R., Flipper, R. B., Subramanian, M. A., Gopalakrishnan, J., and Sleight, A. W., Phys. Rev. B 39, 7309 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Shi, D., Tang, M., Chang, Y. C., Ziang, P. Z., Vandervoort, K., Malecki, B., and Lam, D. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2358 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Shi, D., Chen, J.G., Welp, U., Boley, M.S., and Zangvil, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55 1354 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Shi, D., Boley, M. S., Welp, U., Chen, J. G., and Liao, Y., Phys. Rev. B 40, 5255 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Shi, D., Xu, M., Umezawa, A., and Fox, R. F., Phys. Rev. B 42, 2062 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Pakulis, E.J. and Chandrashekhar, G.V., Phys. Rev. 38 11974 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Pakulis, E.J. and Chandrashekhar, G.V., Phys. Rev. 39, 808 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Sastry, M.D., Kadam, R.M., Babu, Y., Dalvi, A.G.I., Gopalakrishnan, I.K., Sastry, P. V. P. S. S., Phatak, G. M., and Iyer, R. M., J. Phys. C 21, L607 (1988).Google Scholar
24.Owens, F.J. and Iqbal, Z., Solid State Commun. 68, 523 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Tyagi, S., Barsoum, M., Rao, K.V., Skumryev, V., Yu, Z., and Costa, J.L., Physica C 156, 73 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Adrian, F.J., Bohandy, J., Kim, B.F., Moorjani, K., Wallace, J.S., Shull, R. D., Swartzendruber, L. J., and Bennett, L. H., Physica C 156, 184 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Ramakrishna, B. L., Ong, E. W., and Iqbal, Z., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 5803 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Bombik, A., Korczak, S. Z., Mazurek, P., Pacyna, A.W., Subotowicz, M., and Wysokinski, K.I., Physica C 157, 251 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Galestani, G., Rizzoli, C., Andreetti, G. D., Buluggiu, E., Gieri, D. C., Valenti, A., Vera, A., and Amoretti, G., Physica C 158, 217 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Kohl, M., Odehnal, M., Plintovic, M., Safrata, S., and Vacek, K., Supercon. Sci. Technol. (UK) 1, 326 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Schneemeyer, L.F., Van Dover, R. B., Glarum, S.H., Sunshine, S. A., Fleming, R. M., Batlogg, B., Siegrist, T., Marshall, J. H., Waszczak, J. V., and Rupp, L. W., Nature 332, 422 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Warden, M., Baselgia, L., Berlowitz, D., Erhart, P., Senning, B., Stalder, M., Stefanicki, G., Portis, A. M., and Waldner, F., Proceedings of the XXIV Congress Ampere, Posnan, 1988, edited by Stankowski, J. (Elsevier, New York, 1989), pp. 772–736.Google Scholar
33.Bursian, V.E., Bush, A. A., Vikhnin, V.S., Gladyshev, I.V., and Sochava, L. S., JETP Lett. 50, 135 (1989).Google Scholar
34.Bursian, V.E., Bush, A.A., Vikhnin, V.S., Gladyshev, I.V., and Sochava, L.S., Sov. Phys. Solid State 31, 1219 (1989).Google Scholar
35.Zuo, F., Salamon, M.B., Bukowski, E.D., Rice, J.P., and Ginsberg, D.M, Phys. Rev. B 41, 6600 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Masiakowski, J.T., Puri, M., Cuvier, S., Romanelli, M., Schwartz, R.N, Kimura, H., and Kevan, L., Physica C 166, 140 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Rakvin, B., Mahl, T. A., Bhalla, A. S., Sheng, Z. Z., and Dalai, N. S., Phys. Rev. B 41, 769 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Tyagi, S., Barsoum, M., and Rao, K. V., J. Phys. C 21, L827 (1988).Google Scholar
39.Drumheller, J. E. and Waldner, F., in preparation.Google Scholar
40.Pakulis, E.J. and Osada, T., Phys. Rev. B 37, 5940 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. See, for example, Khachaturyan, K., Weber, E. R., Tejedor, P., Stacey, A. M., and Portis, A. M., Phys. Rev. B 36, 8309 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Rubins, R. S., Hutton, S. L., Drumheller, J. E., Jeong, D. Y., and Black, T. D., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1813 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Poole, C. R., Jr., Electron Spin Resonance, 1st ed. (Wiley, New York, 1983), p. 466.Google Scholar