Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:18:30.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlation Between Chemical Reaction and Brittle Fracture Found in Electroless Ni(P)/immersion gold–solder Interconnection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2005

Yoon-Chul Sohn  and
Jin Yu
Yoon-Chul Sohn*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Korea
Jin Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Korea
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: sonyc@kaist.ac.kr
Get access

Abstract

Occurrence of brittle interfacial fracture at an electroless Ni(P)/immersion gold–solder joint has long been a serious problem not yet fully understood. In our previous report on the electroless Ni(P) [J. Mater. Res.19, 2428 (2004)], it was shown that crystallization of the Ni(P) film and growth of the Ni3SnP layer were accelerated after the intermetallic compound (IMC) spalling, and accurate failure locus of the brittle fracture due to so-called “IMC spalling induced microstructure degradation of the Ni(P) film” is presented for the first time in this communication. For Sn–3.0Ag–0.5Cu solder joints, (Ni,Cu)3Sn4 and/or (Cu,Ni)6Sn5 ternary IMCs formed at the interface, and neither spalling nor interfacial fracture was observed. For Sn–3.5Ag joints, Ni3Sn4 compound formed, and the brittle fracture occurred through the Ni3SnP layer in the solder pads where Ni3Sn4 had spalled. Since the Ni3SnP layer is getting thicker during or after Ni3Sn4 spalling, control of IMC spalling is crucial to ensure the reliability of Ni(P)/solder system.

Keywords

Chemical reactionFracturePhase transformation
Type
Rapid Communications
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 20 , Issue 8 , August 2005 , pp. 1931 - 1934
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Eijim, T.I., Hollesen, D.B., Holliday, A., Gahr, S.A., and Coyle, R.J.: Assembly and reliability of thermaly enhanced high I/O BGA packages, in Proc 21st IEEE International Electronics Manufacturing Symposium 25(1997).Google Scholar
2Mei, Z., Kauffmann, M., Eslambolchi, A., and Johnson, P.: Brittle interfacial fracture of PBGA packages on electroless Ni/immersion Au, in Proc 48th Electronic Component and Technology Conference 952(1998).Google Scholar
3Biunno, N.: A root cause failure mechanism for solder joint integrity of electroless Ni/immersion gold surface finishes. Proc IPC Printed Circuits Expo. 1999, s18 (1999).Google Scholar
4Wenger, G.M., Coyle, R.J., Solan, P.P., Dorey, J.K., Dodd, C.V., Erich, R., and Primavera, A.: Case sudies of brittle interfacial fractures in area array solder interconnects, in Proc 26th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis355 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Cullen, D., Huenger, E., Toben, M., Houghton, B., and Johal, K. A study on interfacial fracture phenomenon of solder joints formed using the electroless nickel/immersion gold surface finish. Proc IPC Works. s03-2 (2000).Google Scholar
6Zhong, C.H. and Yi, S.: Solder joint reliability of plastic ball grid array. Soldering Surf. Mount Technol. 11(1), 44 (1999).Google Scholar
7Goyal, D., Lane, T., Kinzie, P., Panichas, C., Chong, K.M., and Villalobos, O. Failure mechanism of brittle solder joint fracture in the presence of electroless Ni immersion gold (ENIG) interface, in Proc 52nd Electronic Component and Technology Conference 732 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Wiegele, S., Thompson, P., Lee, R., and Ramsland, E.: Reliability and process characterization of electroless nickel-gold/solder flip chip interconnect technology, in Proc 48th Electronic Component and Technology Conference 861 (1998).Google Scholar
9Jang, J.W., Frear, D.R., Lee, T.Y. and Tu, K.N.: Morphology of interfacial reaction between lead-free solders and electroless Ni-P under bump metallization. J. Appl. Phys. 88, 6359 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Glenn, O.Mallory, and Hadju, J.B.: Electroless Plating: Fundamentals and Applications (American Electroplater and Surface Finishers Society, 1990), Chap. 4.Google Scholar
11Aschenbrenner, R., Ostmann, A., Beutler, U., Simon, J. and Reichl, H.: Electroless nickel/copper plating as a new bump metallization. IEEE Trans. CPMT. Part B. 18, 334 (1995).Google Scholar
12Sohn, Y.C., Jin, Yu., Kang, S.K., Shih, D.Y. and Lee, T.Y.: Spalling of intermetallic compounds during the reaction between lead-free solders and electroless Ni–P metallization. J. Mater. Res. 19, 2428 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Alam, M.O., Chan, Y.C. and Tu, K.N.: Effect of 0.5 wt% Cu in Sn–3.5% Ag solder on the interfacial reaction with Au/Ni metallization. Chem. Mater. 15, 4340 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Wang, S.J. and Liu, C.Y.: Retarding growth of Ni3P crystalline layer in Ni(P) substrate by reacting with Cu-bearing Sn(Cu) solders. Scripta Mater. 49, 813 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Jang, J.W., Kim, P.G., Tu, K.N., Frear, D.R. and Thompson, P.: Solder reaction-assisted crystallization of electroless Ni–P under bump metallization in low cost flip chip technology. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 8456 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Sohn, Y.C., Jin, Yu., Kang, S.K., Choi, W.K. and Shih, D.Y.: Study of the reaction mechanism between electroless Ni–P and Sn and its effect on the crystallization of Ni–P. J. Mater. Res. 18, 4 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Zeng, K. and Tu, K.N.: Six cases of reliability study of Pb-free solder joints in electronic packaging technology. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 38, 55 (2002).Google Scholar
18Hwang, C.W., Suganuma, K., Kiso, M. and Hashimoto, S.: Interface microstructures between Ni–P alloy plating and Sn–Ag(–Cu) lead-free solders. J. Mater. Res. 18, 2540 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Ho, C.E., Lin, Y.L. and Kao, C.R.: Strong effect of Cu concentration on the reaction between lead-free microelectronic solders and Ni. Chem. Mater. 14, 949 (2002).Google Scholar
20Ho, C.E., Tsai, R.Y., Lin, Y.L. and Kao, C.R.: Effect of Cu concentration on the reactions between Sn–Ag–Cu solders and Ni. J. Electron Mater. 31, 584 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Siewart, T., Liu, S., Smith, D.R. and Madeni, J.C.: Properties of Lead-free Solders, Release 4.0 (National Institute of Standards and Technology & Colorado School of Mines, (2002).Google Scholar
22Hwang, C.W., Suganuma, K., Kiso, M. and Hashimoto, S.: Influence of Cu addition to interface microstructure between Sn–Ag solder and Au/Ni–6P plating. J. Electron Mater. 33, 1200 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Kim, S.W., Yoon, J.W. and Jung, S.B.: Interfacial reactions and shear strengths between Sn–Ag-based Pb-free solder balls and Au/EN/Cu metallization. J. Electron Mater. 33, 1182 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Alam, M.O., Chan, Y.C. and Tu, K.N.: Effect of reaction time and P content on mechanical strength of the interface formed between eutectic Sn–Ag solder and Au/electroless Ni(P)/Cu bond pad. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 4108 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar