Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-r7bls Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-16T01:16:47.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical properties of highly porous alumina foams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2013

Benedikt Simon Michael Seeber*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Urs Thomas Gonzenbach
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Ludwig Julius Gauckler
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: ben.seeber@mat.ethz.ch
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties of porous ceramics are greatly influenced by their microstructure. Therefore, mechanical behavior of highly porous ceramics is different from that of dense ceramics. In this work, we evaluate different mechanical testing methods such as static compression, Brazilian disc test and 3-point bending on their suitability for comparison of highly porous ceramic materials. It is shown that 3-point bending is more suitable than static compression or Brazilian disc testing, as the material exhibits no critical crack propagation under compressive loading. With 3-point bending tests, a quantitative comparison of the mechanical properties of foams with different microstructures and porosities is possible. Under cyclic compression the foams exhibit a very high degree of crack tolerance in combination with preservation of their structural integrity even at high strains of 10%.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Pyzik, A., Ziebarth, R., Han, C., and Yang, K.: High-porosity acicular mullite ceramics for multifunctional diesel particulate filters. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 8(5), 10591066 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blome, J.C.: Molten metal filter. U.S. Patent No 4265659, May 5, 1981.Google Scholar
Studart, A.R., Gonzenbach, U.T., Tervoort, E., and Gauckler, L.J.: Processing routes to macroporous ceramics: A review. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89(6), 17711789 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzwalder, K. and Somers, A.V.: Method of making porous ceramic articles. U.S. Patent No 3090094, 1963.Google Scholar
Schlichting, K.W., Padture, N.P., and Klemens, P.G.: Thermal conductivity of dense and porous yttria-stabilized zirconia. J. Mater. Sci. 36(12), 30033010 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzenbach, U.T., Studart, A.R., Tervoort, E., and Gauckler, L.J.: Macroporous ceramics from particle-stabilized wet foams. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90(1), 1622 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F.: Cellular Solids Structure and Properties (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dam, C.Q., Brezny, R., and Green, D.J.: Compressive behavior and deformation-mode map of an open cell alumina. J. Mater. Res. 5(1), 163171 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezny, R. and Green, D.J.: The effect of cell-size on the mechanical-behavior of cellular materials. Acta Metall. Mater. 38(12), 25172526 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM C1161: Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature. Standard (2002).Google Scholar
ASTM C1674: Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics with Engineered Porosity (Honeycomb Cellular Channels) at Ambient Temperatures. Standard (2011).Google Scholar
ASTM C1424: Standard Test Method for Monotonic Compressive Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature. Standard (2010).Google Scholar
ASTM C1326: Standard Test Method for Knoop Indentation Hardness of Advanced Ceramics. Standard (2008).Google Scholar
ASTM C1327: Standard Test Method for Vickers Indentation Hardness of Advanced Ceramics. Standard (2008).Google Scholar
Borger, A., Supancic, P., and Danzer, R.: The ball on three balls test for strength testing of brittle discs: Stress distribution in the disc. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 22(9–10), 14251436 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danzer, R., Supancic, P., and Harrer, W.: Biaxial tensile strength test for brittle rectangular plates. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 114(1335), 10541060 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessler, H. and Fricker, D.C.: A theoretical analysis of the ring-on-ring loading disk test. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67(9), 582588 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessler, H. and Fricker, D.C.: Multiaxial strength tests for brittle materials. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 19(3), 197208 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, C. and Kollenberg, W.: A modified “Brazilian” disk test - an indirect method to determine the tensile strength of ceramics. 48. Internationales Feuerfest-Kolloquium. (2005).Google Scholar
Gonzenbach, U.T., Studart, A.R., Tervoort, E., and Gauckler, L.J.: Ultrastable particle-stabilized foams. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45(21), 35263530 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzenbach, U.T., Studart, A.R., Tervoort, E., and Gauckler, L.J.: Stabilization of foams with inorganic colloidal particles. Langmuir 22(26), 1098310988 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzenbach, U.T., Studart, A.R., Steinlin, D., Tervoort, E., and Gauckler, L.J.: Processing of particle-stabilized wet foams into porous ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90(11), 34073414 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzenbach, U.T., Studart, A.R., Tervoort, E., and Gauckler, L.J.: Tailoring the microstructure of particle-stabilized wet foams. Langmuir 23(3), 10251032 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seeber, B.S.M., Gonzenbach, U.T., Ebneter, U., and Gauckler, L.J.: Microstructural analysis of highly porous alumina foams, to be submitted.Google Scholar
Colombo, P., Arcaro, A., Francesconi, A., Pavarin, D., Rondini, D., and Debei, S.: Effect of hypervelocity impact on microcellular ceramic foams from a preceramic polymer. Adv. Eng. Mater. 5(11), 802805 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar