Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:35:50.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bi-intercalation of H2SO4 into stages 4–6 FeCl3–graphite intercalation compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Yasuo Mizutani
Affiliation:
Institute of Atomic Energy, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611, Japan
Takeshi Abe
Affiliation:
Institute of Atomic Energy, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611, Japan
Mitsuru Asano
Affiliation:
Institute of Atomic Energy, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611, Japan
Toshio Harada
Affiliation:
Institute of Atomic Energy, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Stages 4–6 FeCl3–graphite intercalation compounds (GIC's) have been prepared by an ordinary two-bulb method, and the bi-intercalation processes of H2SO4 into the GIC's have been studied by x-ray diffraction. Since stages 4–6 FeCl3–GIC's have more than three vacant interlayer spaces in the c-axis repeat distance, the bi-intercalation of H2SO4 into the GIC's takes place stepwise. Consequently, various FeCl3–H2SO4–graphite bi-intercalation compounds (GBC's), from the GBC's with one H2SO4 layer to the GBC's saturated with H2SO4, are obtained in the bi-intercalation processes. Their compositions are described as C6.0nFeCl3 · c(6.0/6.5)H2SO4 from the calculation of structure factor for x-ray diffraction, where n is the stage number of the starting FeCl3-GIC's, and c is the number of H2SO4 layers. Stacking sequences of all the FeCl3–H2SO4–GBC's are also determined.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Lagrange, P.Metrot, A. andHérold, A.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. C273, 701 (1974).Google Scholar
2Freeman, A. G.J. C. S. Chem. Comm. 746 (1974).Google Scholar
3Scharff, P.Stumpp, E. and Ehrhardt, C.Synth. Met. 23, 415 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Nadi, N. E.McRae, E.Mareche, J. F.Lelaurain, M. and Herold, A.Carbon 24, 695 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Suzuki, M.Chow, P.C. and Zabel, H.Phys. Rev. B32, 6800 (1985).Google Scholar
6Shioyama, H.Tatsumi, K.Fujii, R. andMizutani, Y.Carbon 28, 119 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Cowley, J.M. andIber, J.A.Acta Crystallogr. 9, 421 (1956).Google Scholar
8Rudorff, W.Z. Phys. Chem. 45, 2 (1940).Google Scholar
9Metz, W. and Hohlwein, D.Carbon 13, 87 (1975).Google Scholar
10Mazurec, H.Ghavamishahidi, G.Dresselhaus, G. and Dresselhaus, M.S., Carbon 20, 415 (1982).Google Scholar
11Rudorff, W. and Hoffmann, U.Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 238, 1 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Aronson, S.Lemont, S. and Weiner, J.Inorg. Chem. 10, 1296 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Daumas, N. and Herold, A.Acad, C. R.. Sci. Paris Ser. C268, 373 (1969).Google Scholar
14Herold, A.Furdin, G.Guerard, D.Hachim, L.Nadi, N.E. and Vangelisti, R.Ann.Phys. (Paris) 11, 3 (1986).Google Scholar
15Tatsumi, K.Shioyama, H.Souma, I. and Fujii, R.Carbon 28, 595 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar