Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-65d66dc8c9-d62fh Total loading time: 0.407 Render date: 2021-09-29T03:09:31.795Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Corporate reputation, social performance, and organizational variability in an emerging country perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2016

Koustab Ghosh*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Rohtak, MD University Campus, Rohtak, Haryana, India
*
Corresponding author: koustab.g@gmail.com

Abstract

This study estimated and specified a model of corporate reputation, its social performance, and firm-level variables in the context of an emerging country. Corporate reputation is the overall estimation of a firm by its stakeholders expressed by the demonstrative behaviors to its customers, employees, investors, business partners, and general public. The social performance of the firm has been conceptualized in terms of its demonstrative responsible behavior toward community, environment, and employees. Organizational variability has been captured in this study through the representation of firms from various industries as the relationship between corporate reputation and firm’s social performance was contingent on the type of industry and expectation of industry-specific stakeholders relevant to the firm. Data were collected from 220 organizations representing 11 different industry verticals. The findings supported that corporate reputation is determined by the conjoint influence of a host of firm specific as well as its social performance factors. In addition, the reputational effect of firm’s social performance was found to vary both across and within sectors, according to the various types of social performance activities the firm was engaged in. This study demonstrated the comprehensive measures of the firm’s reputation, social performance, and the associative relationship between them conditioned by firm-specific attributes and nature of the industry. The study has far reaching implications in terms of managing the firm’s boundary spanning activities and relationships in the perspective of emerging markets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, V. V., & Subramanian, K. V. (2007). Bankruptcy codes and innovation. Review Of Financial Studies, 22(12), 49494988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 641654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, R., Lynch, R., Melewar, T.C., & Jin, Z. (2014). The moderating influences on the relationship of corporate reputation with its antecedents and consequences: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Research, 68, 11051117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apéria, T., Simcic-Brønn, P., & Schultz, M. (2004). A reputation analysis of the most visible companies in the Scandinavian countries. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(3), 218230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartkus, B. R., Morris, S. A., & Seifert, B. (2002). Governance and corporate philanthropy: Restraining Robin Hood? Business and Society, 41, 319344.Google Scholar
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488506.Google Scholar
Bowen, F. E. (2000). Environmental visibility: A trigger of green organizational responsiveness? Business Strategy and the Environment, 9, 92107.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brammer, S. J., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2009). Corporate reputation and women on the board. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: the importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buskens, V. W. (1999). Social Networks and Trust: Sous-titre. Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 44, 497505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, B. (2001). Changing environmental strategies over time: An empirical study of the steel industry in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 61, 111.Google Scholar
Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 4257.Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 13, 675689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and Inference in Econometrics . New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deephouse, D. L., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2013). Do family business have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 337360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dozier, D. M. (1993). Image, reputation and mass communication effects. In W. Armbrecht, H. Avenarius, & U. Zabel (Eds.), Image and PR – Kann Image Gegenstand einer Public Relations Wissenschaft sein? (pp. 227250). Opladen.Google Scholar
Dukerich, J. M., & Carter, S. M. (2000). Distorted images and reputation repair. In M. Schulz, M. Hatch, & M. H. Larsen (Eds.), The Expressive Organization – Linking Identity, Reputation and the Corporate Brand (pp. 97112). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
European Commission (2001). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility, Green Paper, 264 Final, Brussels.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25, 383417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassin, Y. (2012). Stakeholder management, reciprocity and stakeholder responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 8396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Fombrun, C. (2001). Corporate reputation – its measurement and management. Thesis, 18(4), 2326.Google Scholar
Fombrun, C. & Rindova, V. (1996). Who’s tops and who decides? The social construction of corporate reputations, Working paper, New York, Stern School of Business, New York University.Google Scholar
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233258.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits (13 September), New York Times Magazine, pp. 122–126.Google Scholar
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryxell, G. E., & Wang, J. (1994). The Fortune corporate reputation index: Reputation for what? Journal of Management, 20, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbioneta, C., Ravasi, D., & Mazzola, P. (2007). Exploring the drivers of corporate reputation: A study of Italian securities analysts. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(2), 99123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardberg, N. A. (2006). Reputatie, reputation, réputation, reputazione, ruf: A cross-cultural qualitative analysis of construct and instrument equivalence. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 3961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 229259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and financial performance debate: Twenty five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 6, 315331.Google Scholar
Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halme, M., & Huse, M. (1996). The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Paper presented at Academy of Management Conference, Cincinnati, August.Google Scholar
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 9861014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, S. (2010). Employees’ awareness of their impact on corporate reputation. Journal of Business Research, 64, 657663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, C., Money, K., & Ghobadian, A. (2013). Unpacking the mechanism by which corporate responsibility impacts stakeholder relationships. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 127146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125139.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351371.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. D., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564576.Google Scholar
Kansal, M., & Singh, S. (2011). Measurement of corporate social performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(4), 527546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitchen, P. J., & Laurence, A. (2003). Corporate reputation: An eight-country analysis. Corporate Reputation Review, 6, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, D., Lee, P., & Dai, Y. (2011). Organizational reputation. A Review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 153185.Google Scholar
Loderer, C., & Waelchli, U. (2010). Protecting minority shareholders: Listed versus unlisted firms. Financial Management, 39, 3357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattera, M. & Baena, V. (2015). The key to carving out a high corporate reputation based on innovation: Corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 221241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweiss, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Review, 31, 854872.Google Scholar
MacMillan, K., Money, K., & Downing, S. (2002). Best and worst corporate reputations: Nominations by the general public. Corporate Reputation Review, 4, 374384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603609.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, R. (1987). Managing the corporate social environment: A grounded theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1986). Price and advertising signals of product quality. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 796821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The simplicity of competitive repertoires: an empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 419439.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of whom and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S. (1997). Environmental pollution and competitive advantage: An exploratory study of US industrial-goods manufacturers. Academy of Management Conference Proceedings, August 1, 1997:1, 411–415, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society, 1, 7175.Google Scholar
Musteen, M., Dutta, D. K., & Kemmerer, B. (2010). Corporate reputation: Do board characteristics matter. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 498510.Google Scholar
Navarro, P. (1988). Why do corporations give to charity? Journal of Business, 61, 6593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2003). Stock valuation and the learning about profitability. Journal of Finance, 58, 17491789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 829872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podolny, J. M. (1994). Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 458483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80, 5668.Google ScholarPubMed
Rindova, V. P., & Martins, L. L. (2012). Show me the money: A multidimensional perspective on reputation as an intangible asset. In M. Barnett & T. Pollock (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (pp. 1633). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 10771093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business and Society, 39, 397418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, L. V., & Schneider, M. (2002). The antecedents of institutional investor activism. Academy of Management Review, 27, 554573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534559.Google Scholar
Sabate, J. M., & Puente, E. Q. (2003). Empirical analysis of the relationship between corporate reputation and financial performance: A survey of the literature. Corporate Reputation Review, 6, 161178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiia, D. H. (2000). Measuring business exposure: An empirical measure of stakeholder influence and enterprise visibility. Paper presented at IABS Conference, August 2–5, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity begins at home. Business and Society, 42, 169201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarstedt, M., Wilczynski, P., & Melewar, T. C. (2012). Measuring reputation in global markets – A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 329339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S. (1997). A longitudinal analysis of environmental responsiveness strategies: Antecedents and outcomes. In J. B. Keys & L. N. Dozier (Eds.), Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management. Boston, MA: Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Sharma, S., Pablo, A., & Vredenburg, H. (1999). Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies: The importance of issue interpretation and organizational context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 87109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, T. (2001). Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: A simple hazard model. Journal of Business, 74, 101124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. (1985). Goodwill and Marketing Strategies. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitats-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soleimani, A., Schneper, D., & Newburry, W. (2014). The impact of stakeholder power on corporate reputation: A cross-country corporate governance perspective. Organization Science, 25(4), 9911008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, A. M. (1974). Market signaling: Informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes (Vol. 143). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Staw, B. M., & Epstein, L. D. (2000). What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 523556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sur, S., & Sirsly, C. T. (2013). What’s in a name? Decomposing corporate reputation to assess the relative impact of temporal, firm and industry level factors. Journal of Management Governance, 17, 10471072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tischer, S., & Hilderbrandt, L. (2013). Linking corporate reputation and shareholder value using the publication of reputation rankings. Journal of Business Research, 67, 10071017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turban, D. B., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 733752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658672.Google Scholar
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303319.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, K. (2010). A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement and, theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 357387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, J., Weber, K., & Margolis, J. (2003). Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29(6), 859881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, G., Mitchell, V., Jackson, P., & Beatty, S. (2009). Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: A customer perspective. British Journal Management, 20(2), 187203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. F. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 443454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. (1980). A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedmann, K. (2002). Analyzing the German corporate reputation landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 4, 337353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. J., & Barrett, J. D. (2000). Corporate philanthropy, criminal activity, and firm reputation: Is there a link? Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 341350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, D. G., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and stakeholder information provision. British Journal of Management, 7(4), 329347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Corporate reputation, social performance, and organizational variability in an emerging country perspective
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Corporate reputation, social performance, and organizational variability in an emerging country perspective
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Corporate reputation, social performance, and organizational variability in an emerging country perspective
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *