More myths

DAVID W. LIGHTFOOT

doi:10.1017/S0022226702001718

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Thomason, S. 2006. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. p. 397.

Henrich Hock, H. 2010. Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction. Ed. by Gisella Ferraresi and Maria Goldbach.. Kratylos, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 1.

Viti, Carlotta 2015. Perspectives on Historical Syntax. Vol. 169, Issue. , p. 1.

Smitherman, Thomas 2015. Perspectives on Historical Syntax. Vol. 169, Issue. , p. 93.

Hock, Hans Henrich 2015. Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development. Vol. 75, Issue. , p. 51.

Johnson, Cynthia A. 2016. Review of Walkden (2014): Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Diachronica, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 138.

Daniels, Don 2017. A method for mitigating the problem of borrowing in syntactic reconstruction. Studies in Language, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 577.

Lightfoot, David W. 2019. Chomsky's I-languages: Rethinking catastrophic changes. Acta Linguistica Academica, Vol. 66, Issue. 3, p. 349.

Barlow, Russell 2021. Review of Daniels (2020): Grammatical reconstruction: The Sogeram languages of New Guinea. Diachronica, Vol. 38, Issue. 4, p. 628.

Article contents

More myths

Abstract

Access options

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

More myths

Abstract

Access options

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests