Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T17:19:09.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 46). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. xvii + 596.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2014

Andrew Carnie*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
*
Author's address: Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ, 85737, USAcarnie@email.arizona.edu

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 373415.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 152. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davies, William D. & Dubinsky, Stanley. 2004. The grammar of raising and control: A course in syntactic argumentation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mohammad, Mohammad. 1989. The sentential structure of Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott & Perlmutter, David. 1979. Syntactic argumentation and the structure of English. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar