Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:21:39.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Juan Uriagereka & Pello Salaburu (eds.), Of minds and language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. x+458.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2013

Christina Behme
Christina Behme*
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University
*
Author's address: Department of Philosophy, Dalhousie University, 6135 University Ave., Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4P9, CanadaChristina.Behme@dal.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , July 2013 , pp. 499 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Behme, Christina. 2009. Review of Cartesian Linguistics. Metapsychology Online Reviews 13.36. http://metapsychology.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=book&id=5110&cn=394.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2002. On nature and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Morten H. & Chater, Nick. 1999. Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science 23, 157–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 1999. Minimalist architectures (review article on Ray Jackendoff, The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997). Journal of Linguistics 35, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey. 1990. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey. 1991. Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning 7, 195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey. 1993. Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition 48, 71–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, Daniel. 2005. Biology and language: A consideration of alternatives. Journal of Linguistics 41, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiengo, Robert. 2006. Review of Chomsky's Minimalism by Pieter A. M. Seuren. Mind 115, 469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. & Lewontin, Richard. 1979. The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings Royal Society London B 205, 581–598.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 2009. A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Pinker, Steven. 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for the evolution of language (reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, David & Lappin, Shalom. 1997. A critique of the minimalist program. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 273–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappin, Shalom, Levine, Robert D. & Johnson, David. 2000. The structure of unscientific revolutions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18, 665–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Robert D. & Postal, Paul M.. 2004. A corrupted linguistics. In Collier, Peter & Horowitz, David (eds.), The anti-Chomsky reader, 203–232. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
McGilvray, James. 2006. On the innateness of language. In Stainton, Robert (ed.), Contemporary debates in cognitive science, 97–112. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew I.David, Pesetsky & Cilene, Rodrigues. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85.2, 355–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 2004. Skeptical linguistic essays. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 2009. The incoherence of Chomsky's ‘biolinguistic’ ontology. Biolinguistics 3, 104–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1996. Nostalgic views from Building 20. Journal of Linguistics 32, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric. 2001. Confusion compounded. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19, 879–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2001. Who has confused what? More on Lappin, Levine and Johnson. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19, 887–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A. M. 2004. Chomsky's Minimalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil. 1999. Chomsky: Ideas and ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1998. Rhyme and reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 2001. Cutting derivational options. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19, 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar