Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-qp9dn Total loading time: 0.285 Render date: 2021-06-21T16:28:11.610Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Argument ellipsis in Colloquial Singapore English and the Anti-Agreement Hypothesis1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

YOSUKE SATO
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

This paper provides new data from Colloquial Singapore English (CSE) showing a hitherto unnoticed subject–object asymmetry: empty objects, but not empty subjects, exhibit sloppy/quantificational readings. According to a recent theory of argument ellipsis in Japanese/Korean (Oku 1998; S. Kim 1999; Takahashi 2007, 2008a, b, 2010), these readings obtain as a result of the LF-Copy of an overt argument from a full-fledged clause onto the corresponding empty argument position in an elliptical clause. Şener & Takahashi (2010) and Takahashi (2010) hypothesize that this operation is blocked by ϕ-agreement. This hypothesis provides a principled explanation for the subject–object asymmetry in CSE, coupled with the new observation that primary substrates of CSE – Mandarin, Cantonese, Hokkien and Malay – exhibit the same asymmetry as CSE. My analysis has significant implications for the comparative syntax of argument ellipsis and for theories of contact genesis. Among others, the analysis supports the claim (Miyagawa 2010) that Chinese possesses ϕ-agreement despite the lack of morphological manifestations. The results in this paper also provide strong evidence for the general substratist explanation on the emerging grammar of CSE (Bao 2005).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

[*]

I thank three Journal of Linguistics referees for helpful comments on this paper and Ewa Jaworska for superb editorial assistance with the publication of this paper. My thanks also go to Zhiming Bao, Qizhong Chang, Jim Huang, Chonghyuck Kim, Hisa Kitahara, Shigeru Miyagawa, Koichi Otaki, Daiko Takahashi, Kensuke Takita and Dwi Hesti Yuliani for valuable discussions. This paper would not have been possible without the help of many individuals who provided me with data and judgments from various languages: Qizhong Chang, Liangcai Chen, Jun Hao Ho, Randy Peh, Zechy Wong and Jianrong Yu (Colloquial Singapore English); Derek Ho Leung Chan and Vivian Liu Wai Ling (Cantonese); Wan Yee Lim (Hokkien); Hansah Bte Abdul Hadi, Nurul Azizah Bte Johari, Muhammad Kamal Ikmal Shahril, Muhammad Hamdan Bin Rahmat and Siti Rasyidah Bte Shiehk A H (Malay); and Eni Yuliana and Dwi Hesti Yuliani (Javanese). All errors are mine. This research is supported in part by the start-up grant from the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at National University of Singapore.

References

Alsagoff, Lubna & Ho, Chee Lick. 1998. The grammar of Singapore English. In Foley, et al. (eds.), 201227.Google Scholar
Alsagoff, Lubna. 2012. The development of English in Singapore: Language policy and planning in nation building. In Low, Ee Ling & Hashim, Azirah (eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, policies and language in use, 137154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2004. The evolution of Singapore English: Finding the matrix. In Lim, (ed.), 127149.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2009a. Contact languages: Ecology and evolution in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2009b. The Asian typology of English: Theoretical and methodological considerations. English World-Wide 30, 133148.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto, Lim, Lisa & Mufwene, Salikoko S.. 2007. The sociolinguistic history of the Peranakans: What it tells us about ‘creolization’. In Ansaldo, Umberto, Matthews, Stephen & Lim, Lisa (eds.), Deconstructing creole, 203226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aye, Khin Khin. 2005. Bazaar Malay: History, grammar and contact. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2001. The origins of empty categories in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 16, 275319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2005. The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation. Journal of Linguistics 41, 237267.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Aye, Khin Khin. 2010. Bazaar Malay topics. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 25, 155171.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Lye, Hui Min. 2005. Systemic transfer, topic prominence, and the bare conditional in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 20, 269291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Wee, Lionel. 1999. The passive in Singapore English. World Englishes 18, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battistella, Edwin. 1989. Chinese reflexivization: A movement to INFL approach. Linguistics 27, 9871012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2005. Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23, 757807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert. 1977. Toward the reconstruction of the social matrix of creole language. In Valdman, Albert (ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics, 259276. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Hsu-Te Johnny. 2012. On the non-elidability of phases. In Otaki, Koichi, Takeyasu, Hajime & Tanigawa, Shin-Ichi (eds.), GLOW in Asia Workshop for Young Scholars 2011, 4458. Mie, Japan: Mie University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 152. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter & Hermon, Gabriella. 1998. The typology of WH movement: WH questions in Malay. Syntax 1, 221258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter & Hermon, Gabriella. 2005. The typology of Malay reflexives. Lingua 115, 627758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella & Sung, Li-May. 1990. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 122.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Jonczyk, Elizabeth & Lilly, Jason. 1999. A note on extraction from object position in Javanese and other Javanic languages. In Smallwood, Carolyn & Kitto, Catherine (eds.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 8793. Toronto: University of Toronto, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Deterding, David. 2007. Singapore English: Dialects of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguine, Maia. 2008. Silent arguments without pro: The case of Basque. In Biberauer, Theresa (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, 311329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth. 1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337362.Google Scholar
Foley, Joseph A., Kandiah, Thiru, Bao, Zhiming, Gupta, Anthea F., Alsagoff, Lubna, Ho, Chee Lick, Wee, Lionel, Talib, Ismail S. & Bokhorst-Heng, Wendy (eds.). 1998. English in new cultural contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore: Singapore Institute of Management/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki. 1986. A theory of category projection and its application. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki & Speas, Margaret. 1986. Specifiers and projections. In Fukui, Naoki, Rapoport, Tova & Sagey, Elisabeth (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 128172. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki & Takano, Yuji. 1998. Symmetry in syntax: Merge and demerge. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7, 2786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Lotus. 2005. Verb-stranding VP ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Gupta, Anthea F. 1991. Acquisition of diglossia in Singapore English. In Kwan-Terry, Anna (ed.), Child language development in Singapore and Malaysia, 119160. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, Anthea F. 1994. The step-tongue: Children's English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gupta, Anthea F. 1998. The situation of English in Singapore. In Foley, et al. (eds.), 106126.Google Scholar
Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Hoji, Hajime. 1998. Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 127152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T.James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531574.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1991. Remarks on the status of the null object. In Freidin, Robert (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 5676. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Yun-Hua. 1984. Reflexives in Chinese. Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 10, 163188.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In Quirk, Randolph & Widdowson, Henry. G. (eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures, 1130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Chonghyuck & Sato, Yosuke. 2012. More on kena-passives and the distribution of passive morphemes. Ms., National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Kim, Soowon. 1999. Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8, 255284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1988. Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Linguisticae Investigationes 12, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan-Terry, Anna. 1986. The acquisition of word order in English and Cantonese interrogative sentences: A Singapore case study. RELC Journal 17, 1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan-Terry, Anna. 1989. The specification of stage by a child learning English and Cantonese simultaneously: A study of acquisition processes. In Dechert, Hans W. & Raupach, Manfred (eds.), Interlingual processes, 3348. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Kwok, Kian Woon. 1998. Singapore. In Pan, Lynn (ed.), The encyclopedia of the Chinese overseas, 200217. Singapore: Editions Didier Millet.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1998. Co-existent systems in African-American Vernacular English. In Mufwene, Salikoko S., Rickford, John, Bailey, Guy & Baugh, John (eds.), African-American Vernacular English: Structure, history, and use, 110153. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, Nala Huiying, Ling, Ai Ping & Nomoto, Hiroki. 2009. Colloquial Singapore English got: Functions and substratal influences. World Englishes 28, 293318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ler, Vivien Soon Lay. 2005. An in-depth study of discourse particles in Singapore English. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Lim, Lisa (ed.). 2004. Singapore English: A grammatical description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2009. Not just an ‘outer circle’ Asian English: Singapore English and the significance of ecology. In Siebers, Lucia & Hoffmann, Thomas (eds.), World Englishes: Problems, properties, prospects, 179206. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Sonny. 1988. Baba Malay: The language of the ‘Straits-born’ Chinese. In Steinhauer, Hein (ed.), Papers in Western Austronesian Linguistics 3, 161. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Lobeck, A. 1990. Functional heads as proper governors. In Carter, Juli, DéChaine, Rose-Marie, Philip, Bill & Sherer, Tim (eds.), North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS) 20, 348362. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Low, Ee Ling & Brown, Adam. 2005. English in Singapore: An introduction. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2012. Agreements that occur mainly in main clauses. In Aelbrecht, Lobke, Haegeman, Liliane & Nye, Rachel (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 79112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2013. Surprising agreements at T and C. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2008. Language evolution; Contact, competition and change. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ohso, Mieko. 1976. A study of zero pronominalization in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Oku, Satoshi. 1998. A theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Ortiz de Urbina, Jon. 1989. Parameters in the grammar of Basque. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Otani, Kazuyo & Whitman, John. 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 345358.Google Scholar
Pakir, Anne. 1986. A linguistic investigation of Baba Malay. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai‘i, Mānoa.Google Scholar
Pakir, Anne. 1991. The range and depth of English-knowing bilinguals in Singapore. World Englishes 10, 167179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Haihua. 2000. Why the blocking effect? In Cole, Peter, James Huang, C.-T. & Hermon, Gabriella (eds.), Long-distance reflexives, 279316. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, Peter. 2004. Jamaican creole: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, Bernd, Schneider, Edgar W., Upton, Clive, Mesthrie, Rajend & Burridge, Katie (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, vol. 2: Morphology and syntax, 407438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Platt, John T. 1975. The Singapore English speech continuum and its basilect “Singlish” as a “creoloid”. Anthropological Linguistics 17, 363374.Google Scholar
Platt, John & Ho, Mian Lian. 1989. Discourse particles in Singaporean English: Substratum influences and universals. World Englishes 8, 215221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, John & Weber, Heidi. 1980. English in Singapore and Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poedjosoedarmo, Gloria. 2000. Influences of Malay on the written English of university students in Singapore. In Brown, Adam (ed.), English in Southeast Asia 99: The Fourth ‘English in Southeast Asia Conference’, 210219. Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Richards, Jack C. & Tay, Mary W. J.. 1977. The la particle in Singapore English. In Crewe, William (ed.), The English language in Singapore, 141156. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain. 2012. VP ellipsis, phases and the syntax of morphology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30, 897963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 2003. On the role of selection in the application of merge. In Kadowaki, Makoto & Kawahara, Shigeto (eds.), The Thirty-Third Annual Meeting of the North East Lingusitic Society (NELS 33), 323345. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43, 203227.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru & Murasugi, Keiko. 1990. N′-deletion in Japanese. In Ormazabal, Javier & Tenny, Carol (eds.), UCONN Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 87107. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. 2010. Minimalist interfaces: Evidence from Indonesian and Javanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. 2011. Radical pro drop and fusional pronominal morphology in Colloquial Singapore English: Reply to Neeleman and Szendröi. Linguistic Inquiry 42, 356365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. 2012. Successive cyclicity at the syntax–morphology interface: Evidence from Standard Indonesian and Kendal Javanese. Studia Linguistica 66, 3257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. 2013. Wh-questions in Colloquial Singapore English: Adaptive traits from vernacular Malay and typological congruence. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 28, 299322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. To appear. Argument ellipsis in Javanese and voice agreement. Studia Linguistica.Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke & Kim, Chonghyuck. 2012. Radical pro drop and the role of syntactic agreement in Colloquial Singapore English. Lingua 122, 858873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şener, Serkan & Takahashi, Daiko. 2010. Ellipsis of arguments in Japanese and Turkish. Nanzan Linguistics 6, 7999.Google Scholar
Shellabear, William G. 1913. Baba Malay: An introduction to the language of the Straits-borne Chinese. Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 65, 5063.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew, Choudhury, Arunima & Menon, Mythili. 2013. The derivation and licensing of covert nominals in Bangla, Hindi and Malayalam. Ms., University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Daiko. 2007. Argument ellipsis from a cross-linguistic perspective. Presented at GLOW in Asia VI, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Daiko. 2008a. Quantificational null objects and argument ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 39, 307326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Daiko. 2008b. Noun phrase ellipsis. In Miyagawa, Shigeru & Saito, Mamoru (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, 394422. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Daiko. 2010. Argument ellipsis, anti-agreement, and scrambling. Ms., Tohoku University.Google Scholar
Tan, Ludwig. 2003. Topic-prominence and null arguments in Singapore Colloquial English. In Deterding, David, Ling, Low Ee & Brown, Adam (eds.), English in Singapore: Research on grammar, 110. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Tan, Ludwig. 2007. Null arguments in Singapore Colloquial English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tan, Ludwig. 2009. Topic and null arguments in Singapore Colloquial English. In Lawrence, Jun Zhang, Rubdy, Rany & Alsagoff, Lubna (eds.), Englishes and literatures-in-English in a globalized world: 13th International Conference on English in Southeast Asia, 2328. Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1985. A study of reflexives in Chinese. M.A. thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1989. Chinese reflexives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 7, 93121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurgood, Elżbieta. 1998. A description of nineteenth century Baba Malay: A variety influenced by language shift. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai‘i, Mānoa.Google Scholar
Wee, Lionel. 2004. Reduplication and discourse particles. In Lim, (ed.), 105126.Google Scholar
Wee, Lionel & Ansaldo, Umberto. 2004. Nouns and noun phrases. In Lim, (ed.), 5774.Google Scholar
Yip, Virginia & Matthews, Stephen. 2007. The bilingual child: Early development and language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Argument ellipsis in Colloquial Singapore English and the Anti-Agreement Hypothesis1
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Argument ellipsis in Colloquial Singapore English and the Anti-Agreement Hypothesis1
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Argument ellipsis in Colloquial Singapore English and the Anti-Agreement Hypothesis1
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *