Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:35:12.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When Wurst comes to Wurscht: Variation and koiné formation in Texas German

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2019

Luke Lindemann*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Luke Lindemann, Email: luke.lindemann@yale.edu

Abstract

Texas German is a new world language variety that shows some evidence of koiné development but also presents with substantial variation at many levels of structure. I present a case study on the variant pronunciation of sibilants in Texas German consonant clusters. This feature is fairly frequent and found throughout the regions of German settlement in Central Texas. After a discussion of the presence of this feature in the donor dialects, I investigate the factors that correlate with variation in the modern language. From an analysis of local and global spatial autocorrelation, I argue that variation is not significantly associated with particular geographic regions and is compatible with stable and homogenous variation. This provides insight into our understanding of new dialect emergence and the mechanisms by which dialect features are leveled over multiple generations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akaike, Hirotugo. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6). 716723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, et al. 2014. “Package ‘lme4’.” R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna 12.Google Scholar
Baxter, Gareth J., Blythe, Richard A., Croft, William & McKane, Alan J.. 2009. Modeling language change: An evaluation of Trudgill’s theory of the emergence of New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 21(2). 257296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biesele, Rudolph Leopold. 1930. The history of the German settlements in Texas, 1831–1861. Austin, TX: Press of Von Boeckmann-Jones Company.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C. 2009. The life and death of Texas German (American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C. 2002. The Texas German Dialect Archive as a tool for analyzing sound change. In Austin, Peter, Aristar-Dry, Helen & Wittenburg, Peter (eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Resources and Tools in Field Linguistics, 28.128.4.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C., Ewing, Karen, Moran, Cheryl & Thompson, Jana. 2004. Towards determining the influence of internal and external factors on recent developments in Texas German phonology. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 10(1). 4759.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C., Pierce, Marc, Weilbacher, Hunter,Roesch, Karen, and Halder, Guido. 2010. The Texas German Dialect Archive: A multimedia resource for research, teaching, and outreach. Journal of German Linguistics 22(3). 277296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clardy, Catherine. 1954. A Description and Analysis of German Language Spoken in New Braunfels, Texas. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 1973. Grammatical change in a dying dialect. Language 49. 413438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 1983. Natural second language acquisition from the perspective of the study of language death. In Anderson, R.W. (ed.) Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition, 158167. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 1994. Varieties of variation in a very small place: Social homogeneity, prestige norms, and linguistic variation. Language 70(4). 631696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikel, Fred. 1949. The use of cases in New Braunfels German. American Speech 24(4). 278281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikel, Fred. 1954. The New Braunfels German Dialect. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Eikel, Fred. 1966a. New Braunfels German: Part I. American Speech 41(1). 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikel, Fred. 1966b. New Braunfels German: Part II. American Speech 41(4). 254260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikel, Fred. 1967. New Braunfels German: Part III. American Speech 32(2). 83104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Glenn G. 1963. The German Dialect Spoken in Kendall and Gillespie Counties. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Glenn G. 1965. English loanwords in the German of Fredericksburg, Texas. American Speech 40(2). 102112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Glenn G. 1972. Linguistic Atlas of Texas German. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2011. A statistical method for the identification and aggregation of regional linguistic variation. Language Variation and Change 23(2). 193221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion, Susan. 1996. The death of Texas German in Gillespie County. In Sture Ureland, P. & Clarkson, Iain (eds.), Language contact across the North Atlantic, 443463. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne B. & Salmons, Joseph C.. 2015. Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Acquisition, Attrition and Change (Studies in Language Variation, 18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Terry G. 1977. The German element in Texas: An overview. Rice Institute Pamphlet-Rice University Studies 63(3).Google Scholar
Jordan, Terry G. 1966. German seed in Texas soil: Immigrant farmers in nineteenth-century Texas. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2002. Koinéization and accommodation. In Chambers, J.K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Variation and Change, 669701. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Trudgill, Peter. 2005. The birth of new dialects. In Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans & Kerswill, Paul (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 196220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nützel, Daniel C. 1998. Language death and morphological decay: The case of Haysville East Franconian. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Phd thesis.Google Scholar
Nützel, Daniel C. 2009. The East Franconian dialect of Haysville, Indiana: A study in language death. Regensburg: Edition Vulpes.Google Scholar
Nützel, Daniel C. & Salmons, Joseph C.. 2011. Language contact and new dialect formation: evidence from German in North America. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(10). 705717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ord, J. Keith & Getis, Arthur. 1995. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis 27(4). 286306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ord, J. Keith & Getis, Arthur. 2001. Testing for local spatial autocorrelation in the presence of global autocorrelation. Journal of Regional Science 41(3). 411432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, Marc, Boas, Hans C. & Roesch, Karen. 2015. The history of front rounded vowels in New Braunfels German. In Bondi, Janne Johannessen & Salmons, Joseph C. (eds.), Germanic heritage languages in North America, 117132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Roesch, Karen A. 2012. Language maintenance and language death: The decline of Texas Alsatian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmons, Joseph C. 1983. Issues in Texas German language maintenance and shift. Monatshefte 75. 187196.Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph C. & Lucht, Felecia A.. 2006. Standard German in Texas. In Thornburg-Panther, Linda & Fuller, Janet M. (eds.), Studies in contact linguistics: Essays in honor of Glenn G. Gilbert, 165–86. New York: Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1992. Theory of language death. Contributions to the Sociology of Language 64. 77.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, Herrgen, Joachim & Kehrein, Roland (eds.). 2008. Regionalsprache.de (REDE). Forschungsplattform zu den modernen Regionalsprachen des Deutschen. [Research platform for the modern German regional languages]. Prepared by Bock, Dennis, Ganswindt, Brigitte, Girnth, Heiko, Kasper, Simon, Kehrein, Roland, Lameli, Alfred, Messner, Slawomir, Purschke, Christoph & Wolańska, Anna. Marburg: Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2001. Koine formation and creole genesis. Creole Language Library 23. 175198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith. 2013. Phonology and morphology in Dutch indefinite determiner syncretism: Spatial and quantitative perspectives. Journal of Linguistic Geography 1(2). 115124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New-dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wenker, Georg. 1888–1923. Sprachatlas des Deutschen Reichs. Handgezeichnetes Original von Emil Maurmann, Georg Wenker und Ferdinand Wrede [Linguistic atlas of the German Empire. Hand-drawn original by Emil Maurmann, Georg Wekner and Ferdinand Wrede]. Marburg. Publiziert als Digitaler Wenker-Atlas (DiWA) [Published as the Digital Wenker-Atlas (DiWA)]. www.regionalsprache.de.Google Scholar
Wells, Christopher. J. 1985. German, a linguistic history to 1945. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Joseph B. 1960. The Texas German of Lee and Fayette counties. Rice Institute Pamphlet 47. 8398.Google Scholar
Wilson, Joseph B. 1977. The German language in central Texas today. In Wilson, Joseph (ed.), Texas and Germany. Crosscurrents 63(3), 4758. Houston, TX: Rice University Studies.Google Scholar
Wood, Jim, Horn, Laurence, Zanuttini, Raffaella & Lindemann, Luke. 2015. The Southern Dative Presentative meets Mechanical Turk. American Speech 90(3). 291320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Horn, Laurence. 2014. Micro-syntactic variation in North American English. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Wood, Jim, Zentz, Jason & Horn, Laurence. 2018. The Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: Morphosyntactic variation in North American English. Linguistics Vanguard 4(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar