Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:12:34.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Landowning Bourgeoisie or Business Bourgeoisie? On the Peculiarities of the Argentine Economic Elite, 1880–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2002

ROY HORA
Affiliation:
Roy Hora is Associate Professor of History at the Universidad Nacional de Quilmes-CONICET.

Abstract

This article examines some characteristics of the Argentine business elite between the end of the nineteenth century and the rise of peronismo in the mid-1940s. To do so, it discusses the ideas relating to this theme proposed by Jorge Sábato in his influential study, La clase dominante en la Argentina moderna. Sábato argued that diversification of assets in a wide range of operations constituted the defining aspect of the economic strategy of the late nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century entrepreneurial elite. This hypothesis requires revision. Simultaneous investment in various economic activities also characterises other entrepreneurial classes in the Americas and in Europe, and for this reason does not offer a convincing account of the peculiarities of the Argentine bourgeoisie. Sábato paid little attention to what in more traditional accounts distinguishes the Argentine proprietor class (and, in addition, the economy as a whole) from its counterparts in other parts of the world: its privileged ties to land and to rural production. However, analysis of probate records confirm this picture, especially for the turn-of-the-century elite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the XVII Jornadas de Historia Económica, Tucumán, Argentina, September 2000, and at the Primeras Jornadas de Estudios Regionales, Rosario, Argentina, November 2000. I am grateful for comments offered at these and other occasions, in particular by María Inés Barbero, Stephanie Bower, Tulio Halperín Donghi and Hilda Sabato. The article was translated into English by Kristina Boylan, and edited by the author. This work was supported by the Fundación Antorchas.