Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T21:30:02.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Masking Levels (Minimum Masking Levels) and Tinnitus Frequency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2011

Robert M. Johnson  and
James Fenwick
Robert M. Johnson
Affiliation:
(Portland, Oregon)
James Fenwick
Affiliation:
(Portland, Oregon)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Regardless of the procedure used for the treatment of tinnitus, most clinicians initially attempt to determine the pitch and loudness of tinnitus. If the treatment of choice is a tinnitus masking program, two additional measures are made routinely. The first is an evaluation of the minimum masking level (MML) and the second is a determination of the amount of residual inhibition that occurs as the result of presenting a continuous stimulus over a period of time (generally for one minute).

Type
Session I. Mechanics of Tinnitus - Theory and Fact (Chairman: J. Vernon)
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 98 , supplement S9: Proceedings of the II International Tinnitus Seminar. New York, 10 and 11 June 1983 , June 1984 , pp. 63 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jeffress, L. A., Blodgett, H. C. and Deatherage, B. H. (1952), Masking of pure tones by white noise as a function of the interaural phase of both components. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34: 1124–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffress, L. A., Blodgett, H.C.Sandel, T. T. and Wood, C. L. (1956), Masking of tonal signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28: 416–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffress, L. A. (1965), Binaural signal detection in Vector theory. Defense Research Laboratory, Acoustical Report //245, University of Texas.Google Scholar