Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:55:34.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acoustic shock: an update review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

W A E Parker ,
V L Parker ,
G Parker  and
A J Parker
W A E Parker
Affiliation:
Peak Medical Practice, Matlock Green, UK Medical School, University of Sheffield, UK
V L Parker
Affiliation:
Medical School, University of Sheffield, UK
G Parker
Affiliation:
Peak Medical Practice, Matlock Green, UK
A J Parker*
Affiliation:
Peak Medical Practice, Matlock Green, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Andrew J Parker, Peak Medical Practice, Clinical Sciences Block, Huntbridge Hall, Matlock Green DE4 3BX, UK E-mail: aparker@medicolegal2000.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

This paper discusses the concept of acoustic shock based on a literature review and the results of our own research into cases seen in both clinical and medicolegal practice. With the demise of traditional ‘metal bashing’ and ‘smoke stack’ heavy industries, there has been a decline in the incidence of noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus in this form of employment. However, with the increasing establishment of call centre work, the emergence of acoustic shock has been noted. Acoustic shock is recognised as a clinical entity distinct from noise-induced hearing loss and acoustic trauma.

Objective

This article discusses clinical implications, medicolegal considerations in light of a recent high-profile court case and proposed criteria for diagnosis.

Keywords

Acoustic ShockHearing Loss, Noise-InducedOccupational AccidentsTinnitusHyperacusis
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 134 , Issue 10 , October 2020 , pp. 848 - 853
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr A J Parker takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Axelsson, A, Hamernik, RP. Acute acoustic trauma. Acta Otolaryngol 1987;104:225–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coles, RRA, Lutman, ME, Buffin, JT. Guidelines on the diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss for medical purposes. Clin Otolaryngol 2000;25:264–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gov.UK. Noise at Work Regulations 1989. In: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1989/1790/made [29 April 2020]Google Scholar
Hooper, RE. Acoustic shock controversies. J Laryngol Otol 2014;128:S2–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asmundson, GJ, Carleton, RN. Is acoustic startle a viable exposure protocol for posttraumatic stress disorder? A clinical case study. Cogn Behav Ther 2010;39:311–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grillon, C, Morgan, CA 3rd, Davis, M, Southwick, SM. Effects of experimental context and explicit threat cues on acoustic startle in Vietnam veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 1998;44:1027–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, M, Clarke, G, Graystone, H, Baldwin, DS. Defensive startle response to emotional social cues in social anxiety. Psychiatry Res 2011;186:150–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulliam, JVK, Dawaghreh, AM, Alema-Mensah, E, Plotsky, PM. Social defeat stress produces prolonged alterations in acoustic startle and body weight gain in male Long Evans rats. J Psychiatr Res 2010;44:106–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jovanovic, T, Blanding, NQ, Norrholm, SD, Duncan, E, Bradley, B, Ressler, KJ. Childhood abuse is associated with increased startle reactivity in adulthood. Depress Anxiety 2009;26:1018–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grillon, C, Warner, V, Hille, J, Merikangas, KR, Bruder, GE, Tenke, CE et al. Families at high and low risk for depression: a three-generation startle study. Biol Psychiatry 2005;57:953–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norra, C, Becker, S, Herpertz, SC, Kunert, HJ. Effects of experimental acute tryptophan depletion on acoustic startle response in females. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2008;258:1–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, S, Deter, HC, Rudat, M, Schachinger, H, Zimmermann-Viegoff, F, Weber, C. Anger and cardiovascular startle reactivity in normotensive young males. Int J Psychopathol 2011;79:364–70Google ScholarPubMed
Calhoun, PS, Wagner, HR, McClemon, FJ, Lee, S, Dennis, MF, Vrana, SR et al. The effect of nicotine and trauma context on acoustic startle in smokers with and without post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011;215:379–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milhinch, JC. Acoustic shock injury real or imaginary? Audiology Online 2002. In: http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/acoustic-shock-injury-real-or-1172 [2 September 2020]Google Scholar
Westcott, M. Acoustic shock injury. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:54–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFerran, DJ, Baguley, DM. Acoustic shock. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:301–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patuzzi, R. Acute oral trauma in users of telephone headsets and handsets. Aust New Zeal J Audiol 2001;23:132Google Scholar
Klockhoff, I. Middle-ear muscle reflexes in man. A clinical and experimental study with special reference to diagnostic problems in hearing impairment. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1961;164:1–92Google Scholar
Klockhoff, I, Westerburg, CE. The tensor tympani muscle and tension headache. Proc Ann Scand Migraine Soc 1971;3(suppl 1)Google Scholar
McCombe, A, Baguley, D. Noise induced hearing loss. In: Watkinson, JC, Clarke, RW, eds. Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 8th edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2019Google Scholar
Baguley, D, McCombe, A. Noise induced hearing loss. In: Gleeson, M, ed. Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 7th edn. London: Hodder Arnold, 2008Google Scholar
Parker, W, Parker, V, Parker, G, Parker, A. ‘Acoustic shock’: a new occupational disease? Observations from clinical and medico-legal practice. Int J Audiol 2014;53:764–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acoustic Safety Programme – National Physical Laboratory. National Definitions of Acoustic Shock in Telephone and Headset Users.Salisbury:, Acoustic Safety Programme, 2006. In: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:exi22EFeWGIJ:www.acousticsafety.org/National_Definition_of_Acoustic_Shock_in_Telephone_and_Heads.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=safari [2 September 2020]Google Scholar
Australian Communications Industry Forum. Industry Guideline ACIF G615:2000. Acoustic Safety for Telephone Equipment. Milsons Point: Australian Communications Industry Forum, 2006Google Scholar
Goldscheider C v Royal Opera House Covent Garden Foundation [2018]. Case No. TLQ17/0043;2018:EDWHC 687 (QB)Google Scholar
Londero, A, Charpentier, N, Ponsot, D, Fournier, P, Pezard, L, Norena, AJ. A case of acoustic shock with post-trauma trigeminal-autonomic activation. Front Neurol 2017;16:420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norena, AJ, Fournier, P, Londero, A, Ponsot, D, Charpentier, N. An integrative model accounting for the symptom cluster triggered after an acoustic shock. Trends Hear 2018;22:1–18Google ScholarPubMed
Parker, AJ, Parker, WAE. Acoustic shock: definitions and clinical aspect. ENT & Audiology News 2020;29:2–3Google Scholar