Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-mqbnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-09-24T05:28:15.823Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

A lip-reading assessment for profoundly deaf patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

L. F. A. Martin
Melbourne, Australia
G. M. Clark*
Melbourne, Australia
P. M. Seligman
Melbourne, Australia
Y. C. Tong
Melbourne, Australia
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria.


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Research Article
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Boothroyd, A. (1968) Developments in Speech Audiometry. Sound, 2: 310.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. R., and Giolas, T. G. (1974) Sentence Intelligibility as a function of key word selection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 17: 631637.Google ScholarPubMed
Fry, D. B. (1961) Word and sentence tests for use in speech audiometry. Lancet, i: 197199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujikawa, S., and Owens, E. (1978) Hearing Aid Evaluations for Persons with Total Postlingual Hearing Loss. Archives of Otolaryngology, 104: 446450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujikawa, S., and Owens, E. (1979) Hearing Aid Evaluations for Persons with Postlingual Hearing Levels of 90–100db. Archives of Otolaryngology, 105: 662665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffers, J., and Barley, M. (1981) Speechreading, Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., and Elliott, L. L. (1977) Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61: 13371351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A., Heise, G. A., and Lichten, W. (1951) The Intelligibility of Speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41: 329335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owens, E., and Telleen, C. C. (1981) Speech Perception with Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants. Archives of Otolaryngology, 107: 160163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plant, G. L. (1979) The use of tactile supplements in the rehabilitation of the deafened: a case study. Australian Journal of Audiology, 1: 7682.Google Scholar
Raffin, M. J. M., and Thornton, A. R. (1980) Confidence Levels for differences between Speech-discrimination scores: a research note. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23: 518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risberg, A. (1974) The Importance of prosodic speech elements for the lipreader. Scandinavian Audiology Supplementum, 4: 253264.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. R., and Raffin, M. J. M. (1978) Speech-discrimination scores modelled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21: 507518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, Y. C., Black, R. C., Clark, G. M., Forster, I. C., Millar, J. B., O'Loughlin, B. J., and Patrick, J. F. (1979) Preliminary Report on a multiple-channel cochlear implant operation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 93: 679693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, Y. C., Millar, J. B., Clark, G. M., Martin, L. F., Busby, P. A., and Patrick, J. F. (1980) Psychophysical and Speech perception studies on two multi-channel cochlear implant patients. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 94: 12411256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar