Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-30T15:38:19.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antroscopy: current practice—a survey of UK otolaryngologists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

E. W. Fisher  and
C. B. Croft
E. W. Fisher*
Affiliation:
London
C. B. Croft
Affiliation:
London
*
E. W. Fisher, M.A., F.R.C.S.Ed, The Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8DA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of antroscopy by otolaryngologists in the UK was assessed by means of a postal questionnaire. A response of 70 per cent was obtained. Thirty-three per cent of otolaryngologists currently perform antroscopy; the principal reason for not using the technique being lack of suitable equipment. Twenty-four per cent of non-users believed that antroscopy would not alter their management of patients, and 19 per cent of all responders thought that antroscopy had no proven clinical role. Few surgeons recognized a role for antroscopy in the treatment of antral disease.

Antroscopists preferred to operate on in-patients (73 per cent), under a general anaesthetic (60 per cent) and via the inferior meatus (66 per cent); 76 per cent consider that morbidity is insignificant.

There is clearly a need for studies clarifying the role of antroscopy in clinical practice and to establish the cost-effectiveness of the technique.

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 103 , Issue 8 , August 1989 , pp. 747 - 749
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Draf, W. (1983) Endoscopy of the paranasal sinuses. Springer Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, J. G. (1988) Influence of the intraoperative antroscopy on surgical treatment of the maxillary antrum. Clinical Otolaryngology, 13: 219–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illum, P., Jeppesen, F. and Langeback, E. (1972) X-ray examination and sinoscopy in maxillary sinus disease. Acta Otolaryngologica, 74: 287–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfleiderer, A. G. (1987) Antroscopy via the inferior meatal route under local anaesthetic: a practical guide to the technique. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 101: 1035–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfleiderer, A. G., Croft, C. B. and Lloyd, G. A. S. (1986) Antorscopy: its place in clinical practice. A comparison of antroscopic findings with radiographic appearances of the maxillary sinus. Clinical Otolaryngology, 11: 455–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. C. F. and Cable, H. R. (1988) Correlation of the sinuscopic appearance of the maxillary antrum with histological and bacteriological findings. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 102: 1086–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stammberger, H. and Wolf, G. (1988) Headaches and sinus disease: the endoscopic approach. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Suppl. 134, 97(5): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittet, H. B., Fisher, E. W. and Croft, C. B. (1989) Antroscopy: a comparison between the sublabial (canine fossa) and intranasal (inferior meatus) approaches as an outpatient procedure. Clinical Otolaryngology, 14, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittet, H. B. and Quiney, R. E. (1988) Dehiscence of the intraorbital nerve as a new cause of facial pain. British Medical Journal, 296: 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar