Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T22:20:24.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The US State Department's Narcotics Control Policy in the Americas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Extract

Governments, Like People, Function in ways that enhance their perceived self-interest. Effective narcotics control is in the best interest of the United States for at least three reasons.

First, reducing the available supply of illicit narcotics (potentially) can reduce the incidence and prevalence of abuse by US citizens. For example, by making drugs relatively hard to find and expensive to use, supply-reduction efforts might successfully discourage potential users from experimenting with drugs and risking future chronic, intensive involvement. Moreover, it can be argued that control measures may be an important deterrent in motivating current drug users to seek treatment and find gainful employment (Moore, 1988).

Second, reducing the supply of illicit narcotics may reduce the level of organized crime and lawlessness in the United States. An effective supply reduction program presumably can bring success in stopping trafficking organizations from supplying illegal goods and services; seizing their ill-gotten wealth; punishing their acts; prosecuting them for corrupt practices; and weakening or eliminating these groups as threatening criminal enterprises.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABC/Washington Post Poll (1988) 19 May: 25 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Craig, R. (1987) “Illicit Drug Traffic: Implications for South American Source countries.”Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , 29, 2:134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L., et al.(1987) “Monitoring the Future: 13th Annual Survey of High School Seniors.”An. Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan (released by News and Information Services, 13Januaryl988). Google Scholar
Marttila, and Kiley, (1988). Unpublished briefing document for the Secretary of State on citizen views of the relative importance of various foreign policy issues (April).Google Scholar
Moore, M. (1988) “Supply Reduction and Drug Law Enforcement.” Remarks made before a symposium on Drugs and Crime (March. Washington, DC: Castine Research Foundation. Google Scholar
National Narcotics Intelligence Consumer Committee (NNICC) Report (1987) Washington, DC: Drug Enforcement Administration.Google Scholar
Perl, R. and R. Surrett (1987) “Issue Brief: International Narcotics Control PolicyCongressional Research Service (August). Washington, DC: The Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Thoumi, F. (1987) “Some Implications of the Growth of the Underground Economy in Colombia.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs. 29, 2 (Summer): 3553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of State. Bureau of International Narcotics Matters (USINM) (1988) “INM Fact Sheet: Narcotics Control in ARA Region.” (September). Washington, DC: INM Internal Document.Google Scholar
US Department of State. Bureau of International Narcotics Matters (USINM) (1988) “FY 1989-FY 1991 Policy Guidance for Narcotics Control Program.” (September). Washington, DC: INM Internal Document.Google Scholar
US Department of State. Bureau of International Narcotics Matters (USINM) (1987) “FY 1989-1991 Policy Guidance for Narcotics Control Programs.” (March. Washington, DC: INM Internal Document.Google Scholar
Van Wert, J. (1986) “El Control de los.Narcóticos en México. Una Decada de Instituclonalización y un Asunto Diplomático, ” in Gabriel Szekely (ed.) México-Estados Unidos, 1985. Mexico. City, Mexico: Centro de Estudios Internacionales, El Colegio de México. Google Scholar