Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:19:48.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Return to Innocence? The Social Construction of the Geopolitical Climate of the Post-Invasion Caribbean1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Barry B. Levine*
Affiliation:
Florida International University in Miami (FL)

Extract

Under what conditions may a social scientist legitimately pass judgment on the geopolitical climate of a region? The question is not easy to answer. First, it presupposes acknowledgement that there are value issues embedded in such judgments. Second, while a value-free attitude may indeed be attempted, such an attitude is difficult to achieve. All too frequently, evaluation of a region's “climate” is based on the values of the evaluator (and often without disclosure of this fact to unsuspecting readers).This is especially likely when the observer adopts a theoretical position, taking insufficient account of the tension between society and actors. Unfortunately, such theories give social scientists the false feeling that they have some sort of preferred cognitive vantage point. Theories which incorporate an “oversocialized conception of man” (Wrong, 196l) or, alternatively, an “overly psychological conception of society,” ignore the fact that people act and make decisions about those actions, both of which are based upon value-judgments, and which do not have a one-to-one correlation with any given social situation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This essay is an attempt to further develop several of the arguments first initiated by Barry Levine (1983b). The reader should be forewarned that it is done from a perspective that is avowedly in favor of representative democracy and state-committed capitalism.

References

Bendlx, R. (1964) Nation-Building and Citizenship: Studies of Our Changing Social Order. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Berger, P. (1986) The Capitalist Revolution: Fifty Propositions About Prosperity, Equality and Liberty. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1958) “Out of Utopia: Toward A Reconstruction of Sociological Theory.” The American Journal of Sociology LXIV, 2: 115127.Google Scholar
English, A. (1988) Regional Defense Profile: Latin America. London, England: Jane's Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Emmanuel, P, Brathwaite, F. and Barriteau, E. (1986) Political Change and Public Opinion in Grenada, 1979-1984. Cave Hill, Barbados: University of the West Indies, Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Erisman, H. M. (1989) “The Caribbean States and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Danger of Central Americanization.” (Mimeo).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, E. (1962) On the Theory of Social Change: How Economic Growth Begins (a study from the Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, L. (1987) “Underdevelopment Is a State of Mind: The Latin American Case.” Caribbean Review XV, 4 (Spring): 16-8, 34.Google Scholar
Harrison, L. (1985) Underdevelopment Is a State of Mind: The Latin American Case. Lanham, MD.: University Press of America Google Scholar
Horowitz, I.L. (1988) “Romancing the Dictator.” Caribbean Review XVI, 1 (Spring): 25-7,37.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. (1987) The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Levine, B. (1986) “Methodological Ironies in Marx and Weber.” International Journal of Moral and Social Studies 1, 3 (Autumn): 205218.Google Scholar
Levine, B. (1983a) “Geopolitical and Cultural Competition in the Caribbean — An Introduction: Cuba versus the United States,” pp. 1-18 in Levine, B. (ed.) The New Cuban Presence in the Caribbean. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Levine, B. (ed.) (1983b) The New Cuban Presence in the Caribbean. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Levine, B. (ed.) (1983c) “Grenada Explodes,” a special-topic issue of Caribbean Review XII, 4 (Fall).Google Scholar
Levine, B. (ed.) (1982) “The New Geopolitics,” a special-topic issue of Caribbean Review XI, 2 (Spring)Google Scholar
Levine, D. (1987) “If Only They Could Be More Like Us,” Caribbean Review XV, 4 (Spring): 19, 35.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. (1987) Grenada: the Jewel Despoiled. Baltimore, MD.: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. (1988) “The Imperialist Ideology and Mentality.” Caribbean Affairs 1, 1 (First Quarter): 209-30.Google Scholar
MacDonald, S., Sandstrom, H. and Goodwin, P. Jr. (eds.) (1988) The Caribbean After Grenada: Revolution, Conflict and Democracy. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. and Young, A. (eds.) (1986) Militarization in the Non- Hispanic Caribbean. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Rodriguez Beruff, J. (1989) “United States Caribbean Policy and Regional Militarization,” pp. 179-189 in Loveman, Brian and M. Davies, Thomas Jr. (eds.) The Politics of Antipolitics: The Military in Latin America. Lincoln, NB: The University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Tesatore, J. and Wolfson, S. (eds.) (1985) The Asian Development Model and the Caribbean Basin Initiative. New York, NY: Council on Religion and International Affairs.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1951) The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Weiner, M. and Ozbudun, E. (eds.) (1987) “Empirical Democratic Theory,” pp. 328-367 in Weiner, M. and Ozbudun, E. (eds.) Competitive Elections in Developing Countries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wrong, D. (1961) “The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology.” American Sociological Review 26: 183193.Google Scholar