Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T12:03:03.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Institutional incentives and community policing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2021

Tate Fegley*
Center for Governance and Markets, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
*Corresponding author. Email:


Most American police departments claim to practice community-oriented policing (COP). The stated goals are to build partnerships between the police and the community, maintain order and quality of life, and solve problems that contribute to crime and fear of crime. However, researchers have noted how most departments attempting to implement COP have fallen short in successfully adopting the recommended reforms. This paper argues that the institutional setting in which American public policing operates leads to this result. By contrast, the institutional features of private security make its operation more conducive to achieving the goals of COP. These institutional differences include whether economic calculation is possible, the domain that is policed, and which rules are enforced.

Research Article
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Barnett, R. E. (2014), The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barzel, Y. (1989), Economic Analysis of Property Rights, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, D. H. (1988), ‘Community Policing: A Report from the Devil's Advocate’, in Greene, J. R. and Mastrofski, S. D. (eds.), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, New York: Praeger Publishers, pp. 225238.Google Scholar
Benson, B. L. (1998), To Serve and Protect: Privatization and Community in Criminal Justice, New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. J. (forthcoming), ‘Socialist Calculation and Public Economics in Vincent and Elinor Ostrom's Work on Self Governing Democratic Society’, in Lemke, J. S. and Tarko, V. (eds.), Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School: Building a New Approach to Policy and the Social Sciences, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. J., Lemke, J. S. and Palagashvili, L. (2016), ‘Re-evaluating Community Policing in a Polycentric System’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(2): 305325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boettke, P. J., Palagashvili, L. and Piano, E. E. (2017), ‘Federalism and the Police: An Applied Theory of Fiscal Attention’, Arizona State Law Journal, 49(3): 907933.Google Scholar
Business Round Table (1994), The Growing Demand for Security: Opportunities for UK Suppliers, London: Business Round Table Ltd.Google Scholar
Capowich, G. E. and Roehl, J. A. (1994), ‘Problem-Oriented Policing: Actions and Effectiveness in San Diego’, in Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 92109.Google Scholar
Chriss, J. J. (2015), Beyond Community Policing: From Early American Beginnings to the 21st Century, Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (1998), ‘Defining Police Strategies: Problem Solving, Problem-Oriented Policing, and Community-Oriented Policing’, in Shelly, T. O. and Grant, A. C. (eds.), Problem-Oriented Policing: Crime-Specific Patterns, Critical Issues, and Making POP Work, Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum, pp. 315329.Google Scholar
Cordner, G. W. (1994), ‘Foot Patrol without Community Policing: Law and Order in Public Housing’, in Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 182191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Country Life (2019), ‘Meet the Beadles: The Centuries-Old Private Police Force at Burlington Arcade, the World's Swishest Shopping Mall’, Country Life, Scholar
D'Amico, D. J. (2015), ‘Knowledge Problems and Proportionality’, Criminal Justice Ethics, 34(2): 131155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1967), ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’, American Economic Review, 57(2): 347359.Google Scholar
Engel, R. S. (2002), ‘Patrol Officer Supervision in the Community Policing Era’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(1): 5164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foldvary, F. E. (1994), Public Goods and Private Communities, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Foldvary, F. E. and Klein, D. B. (2003), ‘The Half-Life of Policy Rationales: How New Technology Affects Old Policy Issues’, Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 15(3): 8292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, W. (1994), ‘The Community Role in Community Policing’, in Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 263269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1979), ‘Improving Policing: A Problem-Oriented approach’, Crime & Delinquency, 25(2): 236258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, N. (2017), ‘The Coproduction of Justice’, in Suprenant, C. W. (ed.), Rethinking Punishment in the Era of Mass Incarceration, New York: Routledge, pp. 4968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. R., Bergman, W. T. and McLaughlin, E. J. (1994), ‘Implementing Community Policing: Cultural and Structural Changes in Police Organizations’, in Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 92109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartnett, S. M. and Skogan, W. G. (1997), Community Policing, Chicago Style, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, S. (2006), Citizens, Cops, and Power: Recognizing the Limits of Community, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmstrom, B. and Milgrom, P. (1991), ‘Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design’, Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 7(Special Issue): 2452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. and Newburn, T. (1998), Private Security and Public Policing, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kandt, R. E. (1974), Private Security and the Public Interest: A Pioneering Statewise Study in California, Berkeley, CA: The Institute for Local Self Government.Google Scholar
Kelling, G. L. and Moore, M. H. (1988), The Evolving Strategy of Policing, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Scholar
Kleiman, M. A. R. (2009), When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. and Soskice, D. (2015), ‘Crime, Punishment and Segregation in the United States: The Paradox of Local Democracy’, Punishment & Society, 17(4): 454481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, W. (2002), ‘Partnerships, Information and Public Safety: Community Policing in a Time of Terror’, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(3): 530542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCallum, S. H. (1970), The Art of Community, Menlo Park, CA: Institute for Humane Studies.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D. (1988), ‘Community Policing as Reform: A Cautionary Tale’, in Greene, J. R. and Mastrofski, S. D. (eds.), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality, New York: Praeger Publishers, pp. 4768.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D. (2006), ‘Community Policing: A Skeptical View’, in Weisburd, D. and Braga, A. A. (eds.), Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4473.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D. and Willis, J. J. (2010), ‘Police Organization Continuity and Change: Into the Twenty-First Century’, Crime and Justice, 39(1): 55144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D., Willis, J. J. and Kochel, T. R. (2007), ‘The Challenges of Implementing Community Policing in the United States’, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1(2): 223234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, R. (2002), Parapolice: A Revolution in the Business of Law Enforcement, Toronto: Boheme Press.Google Scholar
Mises, L. von (2007), Bureaucracy, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Moore, M. H. (1992), ‘Problem-Solving and Community Policing’, Crime and Justice, 15: 99158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movement for Black Lives (2020), Defund the Police, Movement for Black Lives, Scholar
Mueller, D. C. (2003), Public Choice III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. H. (2005), Private Neighborhoods and the Transformation of Local Government, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1971), ‘Institutional Arrangements and the Measurement of Policy Consequences: Applications to Evaluating Police Performance’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4): 447475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Whitaker, G. P. (1974), ‘Community Control and Governmental Responsiveness: The Case of Police in Black Neighborhoods’, in Hawley, W. D. and Rogers, D. (eds.), Improving the Quality of Urban Management, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 303334.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M. and Warren, R. (1961), ‘The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry’, American Political Science Review, 55(4): 831842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peed, C. R. (2008), ‘The Community Policing Umbrella’, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 77(11): 2224.Google Scholar
Police Foundation (1981), The Newark Foot Patrol Experiment, Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Ray, R. (2020), ‘What Does “Defund the Police” Mean and Does it Have Merit?’, Brookings Institution, Scholar
Read, T. and Tilley, N. (2000), Not Rocket Science?: Problem-Solving and Crime Reduction (No. 6), London: Policing and Crime Reduction Unit, Home Office.Google Scholar
Reaves, B. A. (2015), Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) – Local Police Departments, 2013: Personnel, Policies, and Practices. Scholar
Rizzo, M. J. (2005), ‘The Problem of Moral Dirigisme: A New Argument Against Moralistic Legislation’, New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 1(2): 790844.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. and Hanson, G. S. (1998), ‘Assessing the Effects of School-Based Drug Education: A Six-Year Multilevel Analysis of Project DARE’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(4): 381412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, J. A., Ryan, J. F., Gaffigan, S. J., Koper, C. S., Moore, M. H., Roehl, J. A., Johnson, C. C., Moore, G. E., White, R. M., Buerger, M. E., Langston, E. A., Thacher, D., Coles, C., Hartmann, F. X., Herrschaft, D., Maguire, E. R., Sheingold, P. and Shelley, M. K. (2000), National Evaluation of the COPS Program: Title I of the 1994 Crime Act, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Rukus, J., Warner, M. E. and Zhang, X. (2018), ‘Community Policing: Least Effective Where Need is Greatest’, Crime & Delinquency, 64(14): 18581881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadd, S. and Grinc, R. (1994), ‘Innovative Neighborhood Oriented Policing: An Evaluation of Community Policing Programs in Eight Cities’, in Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 2752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapland, J. (1999), ‘Private Worlds: Social Control and Security in Britain’, in Shapland, J., and van Outrive, L. (eds.), Police et Sécurité: Contrôle Social et l'Interaction Publique-Privé, Paris: L'Harmattan, pp. 155168.Google Scholar
Shearing, C. D. and Stenning, P. C. (1981), ‘Modern Private Security: Its Growth and Implications’, Crime and Justice, 3: 193245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearing, C. D., Farnell, M. B. and Stenning, P. C. (1980), Contract Security in Ontario, Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1995), ‘The Police’, in Wilson, J. Q. and Herrnstein, R. J. (eds.), Crime, San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, pp. 325348.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Milton, C., Kelly, T. V. and MacBride, T. F. (1973), Team Policing: Seven Case Studies, Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (1990), Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Cities, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G., Steiner, L., Benitez, C., Bennis, J., Borchers, S., DuBois, J., et al. (2004), Community Policing in Chicago, Year Ten, Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.Google Scholar
Tiebout, C. M. (1956), ‘A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy, 64(5): 416424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiebout, C. M. (1961), ‘An Economic Theory of Fiscal Decentralization’, in Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 7996.Google Scholar
Tien, J. M. and Rich, T. F. (1994), ‘The Hartford COMPASS Program: Experiences with a Weed and Seed-Related Program’, in Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 192206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice (2009), Community Policing Defined, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice (2011), Problem-Solving Tips: A Guide to Reducing Crime and Disorder through Problem-Solving Partnerships, Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Vitale, A. S. (2017), The End of Policing, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Wakefield, A. (2003), Selling Security, Willan: London.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. and Kelling, G. L. (1982), ‘Broken Windows’, Atlantic Monthly, 249(3): 2938.Google Scholar
Woods, T. (2016), Can the Private Sector Protect Against Crime? This Case Study Will Blow Your Mind. Scholar
Zhao, J., He, N. and Lovrich, N. P. (1998), ‘Individual Value Preferences Among American Police Officers: The Rokeach Theory of Human Values Revisited’, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 21(1): 2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J., Lovrich, N. P. and Robinson, T. H. (2001), ‘Community Policing: Is It Changing the Basic Functions of Policing?: Findings from a Longitudinal Study of 200 + Municipal Police Agencies’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(5): 365377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar