Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-65dc7cd545-rrwn7 Total loading time: 0.247 Render date: 2021-07-26T02:45:47.296Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The chronic uncertainty of American Indian property rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2021

Eric Alston
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Adam Crepelle
Affiliation:
Southern University Law Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Wilson Law
Affiliation:
Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA
Ilia Murtazashvili
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Corresponding

Abstract

Property institutions should ideally provide economic actors with certainty that their local choices about investment will not be unsettled by shifting political economic equilibria. We argue that for this to occur, political autonomy, administrative and enforcement capacity, political constraints, and accessible legal institutions are each necessary. A comparison of the evolution of property rights for settlers and American Indians in the United States shows how political and legal forces shape the evolution of property institutions. American Indians, who had property institutions before Europeans arrived, could not defend their land from Europeans and later Americans due to lacking military capacity. Settlers' property rights were relatively secure because the government had sufficient autonomy and capacity to broadly define and enforce their rights, political institutions constrained the government from expropriating settlers' property, and legal institutions provided a forum for settlers to adjudicate and defend their rights in court. Native Americans, in contrast, had systematically inconsistent and often expropriative policy treatment by the government. Although tribes have technically been sovereign since the 1970s, tribal governments continue to lack sufficient political and legal autonomy and capacity to define and enforce property institutions in response to evolving local conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Ablavsky, G. (2014), ‘The Savage Constitution’, Duke Law Journal, 63(5): 9991089.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2019), The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty, New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Allen, D. W. (1991a), ‘Homesteading and Property Rights; Or, ‘How the West Was Really Won’’, Journal of Law and Economics, 34(1): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. W. (1991b), ‘What are Transaction Costs’, Research in Law and Economics, 14(1): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. W. (2015), ‘The Coase Theorem: Coherent, Logical, and not Disproved’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(2): 379390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. W. (2019), ‘Establishing Economic Property Rights by Giving Away an Empire’, Journal of Law and Economics, 62(2): 251280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. W. and Leonard, B. (2020), ‘Rationing by Racing and the Oklahoma Land Rushes’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(2): 127144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, E. and Smith, S. (2020), Development Derailed: Uncertain Property Rights and Asset-Specific Investment. [online]. Available from: Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3201434Google Scholar
Alston, E., Alston, L. J., Mueller, B. and Nonnenmacher, T. (2018) Institutional and Organizational Analysis: Concepts and Applications, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. L. and Hill, P. J. (1975), ‘The Evolution of Property Rights: A Study of the American West’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 18(1): 163179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. L. and Leonard, B. (2016), ‘Institutions and the Wealth of Indian Nations’, in Anderson, Terry L. (ed.), Unlocking the Wealth of Indian Nations, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, pp. 317.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. L. and McChesney, F. S. (1994), ‘Raid or Trade? An Economic Model of Indian-White Relations’, Journal of Law and Economics, 37(1): 3974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. L. and Parker, D. P. (2008), ‘Sovereignty, Credible Commitments, and Economic Prosperity on American Indian Reservations’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 51(4): 641666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arruñada, B. (2012), Institutional Foundations of Impersonal Exchange: Theory and Policy of Contractual Registries, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arruñada, B. and Garoupa, N. M. (2005), ‘The Choice of Titling System in Land’, Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2): 709727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. D. (2009), Navajo Courts and Navajo Common law: A Tradition of Tribal Self-Governance, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Barzel, Y. (2002), A Theory of the State: Economic Rights, Legal Rights, and the Scope of the State, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Batchelder, R. W. and Freudenberger, H. (1983), ‘On the Rational Origins of the Modern Centralized State’, Explorations in Economic History, 20(1): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensel, R. F. (1990), Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859–1877, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, B. L. (2006), ‘Property Rights and the Buffalo Economy of the Great Plains’, in Anderson, Terry L. et al. (ed.), Self-determination: The Other Path for Native Americans, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, pp. 2967.Google Scholar
Bleakley, H. and Lin, J. (2012), ‘Portage and Path Dependence’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2): 587644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobroff, K. H. (2001), ‘Retelling Allotment: Indian Property Rights and the Myth of Common Ownership’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 54(4): 15571625.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. J. and Candela, R. (2020), ‘Productive Specialization, Peaceful Cooperation, and the Problem of the Predatory State: Lessons From Comparative Historical Political Economy’, Public Choice, 182(3–4): 331352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogue, A. G. and Bogue, M. B. (1957), ‘“Profits” and the Frontier Land speculator’, The Journal of Economic History, 17(01): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, S. and Wallis, J. J. (2017), Growing, Shrinking, and Long run Economic Performance: Historical Perspectives on Economic development. SSRN Working Paper 23343. Available from: DOI 10.3386/w23343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. R., Cookson, J. A. and Heimer, R. Z. (2017), ‘Law and Finance Matter: Lessons From Externally Imposed Courts’, The Review of Financial Studies, 30(3): 10191051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1975), The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cai, M., Murtazashvili, I. and Murtazashvili, J. (2020), ‘The Politics of Land Property Rights’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(2): 151167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candela, R. A. (2020), ‘The Political Economy of Insecure Property Rights: Insights from the Kingdom of Sicily’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(2): 233249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candela, R. and Geloso, V. (2020), ‘Trade or Raid: Acadian Settlers and Native Americans before 1755’, Public Choice, Online First: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00853-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, L. A. (1981), Indians, Bureaucrats, and Land: The Dawes act and the Decline of Indian Farming. Contributions in Economics and Economic History, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. A. and Riley, A. R. (2019), ‘Privatizing the Reservation’, Stanford Law Review, 71(4): 791878.Google Scholar
Cornell, S. and Kalt, J. P. (1995), ‘Where Does Economic Development Really come from? Constitutional Rule among the Contemporary Sioux and Apache’, Economic Inquiry, 33(3): 402426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, S. and Kalt, J. P. (1998), ‘Sovereignty and Nation-Building: The Development Challenge in Indian Country Today’, American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 22(3): 187214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, S. and Kalt, J. P. (2000), ‘Where's the Glue? Institutional and Cultural Foundations of American Indian Economic Development’, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 29(5): 443470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepelle, A. (2019), ‘Decolonizing Reservation Economies: Returning to Private Enterprise and Trade’, Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship, and the Law, 12: 129188.Google Scholar
Crepelle, A. (2020), ‘Taxes, Theft, and Indian Tribes: Seeking Tribal-State Tax Parity’, West Virginia Law Review, 122(3): 9991032.Google Scholar
Crepelle, A. and Block, W. E. (2016), ‘Property Rights and Freedom: The Keys to Improving Life in Indian Country’, Washington & Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice, 23: 315342.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1967), ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’, American Economic Review, 57(2): 347359.Google Scholar
de Soto, H. (2000), The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dippel, C. (2014), ‘Forced Coexistence and Economic Development: Evidence from Native American Reservations’, Econometrica, 82(6): 21312165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dippel, C., Frye, D. and Leonard, B. (2020), ‘Property Rights Without Transfer Rights: A Study of Indian Land Allotment’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 27479.Google Scholar
Dunham, H. H. (1937), ‘Some Crucial Years of the General Land Office, 1875–1890’, Agricultural History, 11(2): 117141.Google Scholar
EagleWoman, A. (2009), ‘Tribal Nations and Tribalist Economics: The Historical and Contemporary Impacts of Intergenerational Material Poverty and Cultural Wealth Within the United States’, Washburn Law Journal, 49(3): 805840.Google Scholar
Edwards, R., Friefeld, J. K. and Wingo, R. S. (2017) Homesteading the Plains: Toward A New History: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feir, D. L. (2016), ‘The Long-Term Effects of Forcible Assimilation Policy: The Case of Indian Boarding Schools’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 49(2): 433480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feir, D., Gillezeau, R. and Jones, M.. (2019), The Slaughter of the Bison and Reversal of Fortunes on the Great Plains. Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Foner, E. (1971), Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, D. (2016), ‘Paternalism versus Sovereignty: The Long Run Economic Effects of the Indian Reorganization Act’, in Anderson, Terry L. (ed), Unlocking the Wealth of Indian Nations, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 223295.Google Scholar
Geloso, Vincent J. and Salter, Alexander W. (2020), ‘State Capacity and Economic Development: Causal Mechanism or Correlative Filter?’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 17: 372385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, C. and Valdez, H. (2008), Final Report Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Under Public Law 280.Google Scholar
Gwynne, S. C. (2010) Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Haber, S., Razo, A. and Maurer, N. (2003), The Politics of Property Rights: Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth in Mexico, 1876–1929, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harring, N. and Harring, S. L. (1994), Crow Dog's Case: American Indian Sovereignty, Tribal law, and United States law in the Nineteenth Century, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. A. (1998), ‘The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets’, Harvard Law Review, 111(3): 621688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, P. J. (2014), ‘Are all Commons Tragedies? The Case of Bison in the Nineteenth Century’, The Independent Review, 18(4): 485502.Google Scholar
Johnsen, D. B. (1986), ‘The Formation and Protection of Property Rights among the Southern Kwakiutl Indians’, The Journal of Legal Studies, 15(1): 4167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalt, J. P. and Singer, J. W. (2004), Myths and Realities of Tribal Sovereignty: The Law and Economics of Indian Self-rule, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, T. W. (1996), Comanche Political History: An Ethnohistorical Perspective, 1706–1875: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Leeson, P. T. (2020), ‘Logic is a Harsh Mistress: Welfare Economics for Economists’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(2): 145150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, P. T. and Harris, C. (2018), ‘Wealth-Destroying Private Property Rights’, World Development, 107: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libecap, G. D. (1989), Contracting for Property Rights, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Libecap, G. D. and Lueck, D. (2011), ‘The Demarcation of Land and the Role of Coordinating Property Institutions’, Journal of Political Economy, 119(3): 426467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lueck, D. (2002), ‘The Extermination and Conservation of the American Bison’, The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(S2): S609S652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McChesney, F. S. (1990), ‘Government as Definer of Property Rights: Indian Lands, Ethnic Externalities, and Bureaucratic Budgets’, Journal of Legal Studies, 19(2 - Part 1): 297336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLoughlin, W. G. (2014), After the Trail of Tears: The Cherokees’ Struggle for Sovereignty, 1839–1880, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
McSloy, S. P. (1994), ‘Revisiting the Courts of the Conqueror: American Indian Claims Against the United States’, American University Law Review, 44(2): 537644.Google Scholar
Meriam, L. (1928), The Problem of Indian Administration, Washington, DC: Institute for Government Research.Google Scholar
Miller, R. J. (2001), ‘Economic Development in Indian Country: Will Capitalism or Socialism Succeed’, Oregon Law Review, 80(3): 757860.Google Scholar
Miller, R. J. (2012), Reservation ‘Capitalism:’ Economic Development in Indian Country, Omaha: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R. J. (2018), ‘Sovereign Resilience: Reviving Private-Sector Economic Institutions in Indian Country’, Brigham Young University Law Review, 2018(6): 13311406.Google Scholar
Miller, R. J., Jorgensen, M. and Stewart, D. (2019), Creating Private Sector Economies in Native America: Sustainable Development through Entrepreneurship, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murtazashvili, I. (2013), The Political Economy of the American Frontier, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostler, J. (2001), “The Last Buffalo Hunt’ and Beyond: Plains Sioux Economic Strategies in the Early Reservation Period’, Great Plains Quarterly, 21(2): 115130.Google Scholar
Perdue, T. (1979), Slavery and the Evolution of Cherokee Society, 1540–1866, Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Powers, F. P. (1889), ‘The Guilford Miller Case and the Railroad Indemnity Lands’, Political Science Quarterly, 4(3): 452479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prucha, F. P. (1994), American Indian Treaties: The History of a Political Anomaly, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prucha, F. P. (1995), The Great Father: The United States Government and the American Indians, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Russ, J. and Stratmann, T. (2016), ‘Divided Interests: The Increasing Detrimental Fractionation of Indian Land Ownership’, in Anderson, Terry L. (ed.), Unlocking the Wealth of Indian Nations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 129159.Google Scholar
Sawers, B. (2009), ‘Tribal Land Corporations: Using Incorporation to Combat Fractionation’, Nebraska Law Review, 88(2): 385432.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, J. A. (2014), ‘No Sticks in My Bundle: Rethinking the Indian Land Tenure Problem’, University of Kansas Law Review, 63(2): 383450.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, J. A. (2016), ‘Complexity's Shadow: American Indian Property, Sovereignty, and the Future’, Michigan Law Review, 115(4): 487552.Google Scholar
Swierenga, R. P. (1966), ‘Land Speculator “Profits” Reconsidered: Central Iowa as a Test case’, The Journal of Economic History, 26(01): 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. S. (2011), ‘Buffalo Hunt: International Trade and the Virtual Extinction of the North American Bison’, American Economic Review, 101(7): 31623195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twetten, D. (1999), ‘Public law 280 and the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act: Could Two Wrongs Ever be Made Into a Right’. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 90(4): 13171352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahabi, M. (2004), The Political Economy of Destructive Power, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahabi, M. (2016), ‘A Positive Theory of the Predatory State’, Public Choice, 168(3–4): 153175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washburn, K. K. (2016), ‘What the Future Holds: The Changing Landscape of Federal Indian Policy’, Harvard Law Review Forum, 130(6): 200232.Google Scholar
White, H. B., Stoner, K. G. and White, J. G. (2008), ‘Creative Civil Remedies Against Non-Indian Offenders in Indian Country’, Tulsa Law Review, 44(2): 427446.Google Scholar
Williams, R. A. Jr (1986), ‘The Algebra of Federal Indian Law: The Hard Trail of Decolonizing and Americanizing the White Man's Indian Jurisprudence’, Wisconsin Law Review, 1986(2): 219300.Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The chronic uncertainty of American Indian property rights
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The chronic uncertainty of American Indian property rights
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The chronic uncertainty of American Indian property rights
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *