Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:36:58.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two glutathione transferase isoforms isolated from juvenile cysts of Taenia crassiceps: identification, purification and characterization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2017

G. Maldonado ,
G. Nava  and
A. Plancarte
G. Maldonado
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiologia y Parasitologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, UNAM, Ciudad de México, 04510, México
G. Nava
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiologia y Parasitologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, UNAM, Ciudad de México, 04510, México
A. Plancarte*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiologia y Parasitologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, UNAM, Ciudad de México, 04510, México
*
Author for correspondence: A. Plancarte, Fax: +52 55 56232384, E-mail: apc@unam.mx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We identified and characterized the first two glutathione transferases (GSTs) isolated from juvenile cysts of Taenia crassiceps (EC 2.5.1.18). The two glutathione transferases (TcGST1 and TcGST2) were purified in a single-step protocol using glutathione (GSH)-sepharose chromatography in combination with a GSH gradient. The specific activities of TcGST1 and TcGST2 were 26 U mg−1 and 19 U mg−1, respectively, both at 25°C and pH 6.5 with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) and GSH as substrates. The Km(CDNB) and Kcat(CDNB) values for TcGST1 and TcGST2 (0.86 μm and 62 s−1; 1.03 μm and 1.97 s−1, respectively) and Km(GSH) and Kcat(GSH) values for TcGST1 and TcGST2 (0.55 μm and 11.61 s−1; 0.3 μm and 32.3 s−1, respectively) were similar to those reported for mammalian and helminth GSTs. Mass spectrometry analysis showed that eight peptides from each of the two parasite transferases were a match for gi|29825896 glutathione transferase (Taenia solium), confirming that both enzymes are GSTs. The relative molecular masses were 54,000 ± 0.9 for the native enzymes and 27,500 ± 0.5 for the enzyme subunits. Thus, TcGST1 and TcGST2 are dimeric proteins. Optimal TcGST1 and TcGST2 activities were observed at pH 8.5 in the range of 20–55°C and pH 7.5 at 35–40°C, respectively. TcGST1 and TcGST2 were inhibited by cibacron blue (CB), bromosulphophthalein (BST), rose bengal (RB), indomethacin and haematin (Hm) with 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) in the μm range. TcGST1 was inhibited in a non-competitive manner by all tested inhibitors with the exception of indomethacin, which was uncompetitive. The discovery of these new GSTs facilitates the potential use of T. crassiceps as a model to investigate multifunctional GSTs.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 92 , Issue 6 , November 2018 , pp. 687 - 695
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

These authors contributed equally to the work.

References

Almeida, L, Miguel, C, de Souza, R and Clare, M (2014) Partial reverse of the TCA cycle is enhanced in Taenia crassiceps experimental neurocysticercosis after in vivo treatment with anthelminthic drugs. Parasitology Research 113, 1313–1317.Google Scholar
Brophy, PM, Papadopoulos, A, Touraki, M, Coles, B, Körting, W and Barrett, J (1989a) Purification of cytosolic glutathione transferase from Schistocephalus solidus (plerocercoid): interaction with anthelmintics and products of lipid peroxidation. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 36, 187–196.Google Scholar
Brophy, PM, Southan, C and Barret, J (1989b) Glutathione transferases in the tapeworm Moniezia expansa. Biochemical Journal 262, 939–946.Google Scholar
Carpio, A and Hauser, WA (2009) Epilepsy in the developing world. Current Neurology Neuroscience Reports 9, 319–326.Google Scholar
Chau, CY and Freeman, RS (1976) Intraperitoneal passage of Taenia crassiceps in rats. Journal of Parasitology 62, 837–839.Google Scholar
Cheng, TC (1986) General parasitology. Orlando, Florida, USA, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, AG (1989) The comparative enzymology of the glutathione S-transferases from non-vertebrate organism. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 92B, 419–446.Google Scholar
Dixon, HBF and Lipscomb, FM (1961) Cysticercosis: an analysis and follow up of 450 cases. Privy Council Medical Research, Special Report Series No. 299. pp. 38–42. London, UK, H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Esquivel-Velázquez, M, Hernández, R, Larralde, C and Ostoa-Saloma, P (2014) Crosstalk among Taenia crassiceps (ORF Strain) cysts regulates their rates of budding by ways of soluble and contact signals exchanged between them. BioMed Research International. Article ID 703693, 4 pp.Google Scholar
Fleury, A, Gomez, T, Alvarez, I, Meza, D, Huerta, M, Chavarria, A, Carrillo, RA, Lloyd, C, Dessein, A, Preux, PM, Dumas, M, Larralde, C, Sciutto, E and Fragoso, G (2003) High prevalence of calcified silent neurocysticercosis in a rural village of Mexico. Neuroepidemiology 22, 139–145.Google Scholar
Frova, C (2006) Glutathione transferases in the genomics era: new insights and perspectives. Biomolecular Engineering 23, 149–169.Google Scholar
García-Montoya, GM, Mesa-Arango, JA, Isaza-Agudelo, JP, Agudelo-Lopez, SP, Cabarcas, F, Barrera, LF and Alzate, JF (2016) Transcriptome profiling of the cysticercus stage of the laboratory model Taenia crassiceps, strain ORF. Acta Tropica 154, 50–62.Google Scholar
Garfin, DE (1990) One-dimensional gel electrophoresis. pp. 425–441 in Deutscher, MP (Ed.) Guide to protein purification. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gill, SC and von Hippel, PH (1989) Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data. Analytical Biochemistry 182, 319–326.Google Scholar
Habig, WH and Jakoby, WB (1981) Assays for differentiation of glutathione S-transferases. Methods in Enzymology 77, 398–405.Google Scholar
Habig, WH, Pabst, MJ and Jakoby, WB (1974) Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 249, 7130–7139.Google Scholar
Hagel, L (1998) Gel filtration. pp. 79–143 in Janson, J-CH and Rydén, L (Eds) Protein purification. Principles, high resolution methods, and applications. New York, Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hayes, JD and Pulford, DJ (1995) The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 30, 445–600.Google Scholar
Hayes, JD, Flanagan, JU and Jowsey, IR (2005) Glutathione transferase. Annual Review of Pharmacological and Toxicology 45, 51–88.Google Scholar
Jaffe, JJ and Lambert, RA (1986) Glutathione S-transferase in adult Dirofilaria immitis and Brugia pahangi. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 20, 199–206.Google Scholar
Kraft, R (2007) Cysticercosis: an emerging parasitic disease. American Family Physicia 76, 91–96.Google Scholar
Laemmli, UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685.Google Scholar
Mannervik, B (1985) The isoenzymes of glutathione transferases. Advances in Enzymology and Related Areas of Molecular Biology 57, 357–417.Google Scholar
Mannervik, B and Danielson, UH (1988) Glutathione transferases – structure and catalytic activity. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry 23, 283–337.Google Scholar
Merril, CR, Switzer, RC and Van Keuren, ML (1979) Trace polypeptides in cellular extracts and human body fluids detected by two-dimensional electrophoresis and a highly sensitive silver stain. Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences, USA 76, 4335–4339.Google Scholar
O'Learly, KA and Tracy, JW (1988) Purification of three cytosolic glutathione S-transferases from adult Schistosoma mansoni. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 264, 1–12.Google Scholar
Ong, S, Talan, DA, Moran, GJ, Mower, W, Newdow, M, Tsang, VC and Pinner, RW EMERGEncy ID NET Study Group (2002) Neurocysticercosis in radiographically imaged seizure patients in U.S. emergency departments. Emerging Infectious Diseases 8, 608–613.Google Scholar
Paglia, DE and Valentine, WN (1967) Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 70, 158–169.Google Scholar
Penninckx, MJ and Jaspers, CJ (1982) On the role of glutathione in microorganisms. Bulletin de l'Instituto Pasteur 80, 291–330.Google Scholar
Plancarte, A, Rendon, J and Landa, A (2004) Purification, characterization and kinetic properties of the Taenia solium glutathione S-transferase isoform 26.5 kDa. Parasitology Research 93, 137–144.Google Scholar
Plancarte, A, Romero, JR, Nava, G, Reyes, H and Hernandez, M (2014) Evaluation of the non-catalytic binding function of Ts26GST a glutathione transferase isoform of Taenia solium. Experimental Parasitology 138, 63–70.Google Scholar
Prasad, A, Gupta, RK, Pradhan, S and Tripathi, M (2008) What triggers seizures in neurocysticercosis? A MRI-based study in pig farming community from a district of North India. Parasitology International 57, 166–171.Google Scholar
Rao, UR, Salinas, G and Mehta, K (2000) Identification and localization of glutathione S-transferase as a potential target enzyme in Brugia species. Parasitology Research 8, 908–915.Google Scholar
Sciutto, E, Fragoso, G and Larralde, C (2011) Taenia crassiceps as a model for Taenia solium and the S3Pvac vaccine. Parasite Immunology 33, 79–80.Google Scholar
Segel, I (1993) Enzyme kinetics. Behavior and analysis of rapid equilibrium and steady-state enzyme systems. New York, Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sheehan, D, Meade, G, Foley, VM and Dowd, CA (2001) Structure, function and evolution of glutathione transferases: implications for classification of non-mammalian members of an ancient enzyme superfamily. Biochemistry Journal 360, 1–16.Google Scholar
Siebert, AE, Good, AH and Simmons, JE (1978) Kinetics of primary and secondary infections with Taenia crassiceps metacestodes (Zender, 1800) Rudolphi, 1810 (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). International Journal of Parasitology 8, 39–43.Google Scholar
Tahir, MK and Mannervik, B (1985) Inhibitors for distinction of three types of human glutathione transferase. Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS Letters) 181, 249–252.Google Scholar
Xolapa, W, Vallecillo, AJ, Lara, M, Mendoza-Hernandez, G, Comini, M, Spallek, R, Singh, M and Espitia, E (2007) Identification of novel bacterial plasminogen-binding proteins in the human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proteomics 7, 3332–3341.Google Scholar
White, A, Robinson, P and Kuhn, R (1997) Taenia solium cysticercosis: host–parasite interactions and the immune response. Chemical Immunology 66, 209–230.Google Scholar
Willms, K and Zurabian, R (2010) Taenia crassiceps: in vivo and in vitro models. Parasitology 137, 335–346.Google Scholar