Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T15:20:14.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of geographical and climatic factors on cystic echinococcosis in south-western Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2020

A. Jamshidi
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
A. Haniloo*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
A. Fazaeli
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
M.A. Ghatee*
Affiliation:
Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: M.A. Ghatee, E-mail: ghateea1980@gmail.com and A. Haniloo, Email: hani@zums.ac.ir
Author for correspondence: M.A. Ghatee, E-mail: ghateea1980@gmail.com and A. Haniloo, Email: hani@zums.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is caused by the larval form of Echinococcus granulosus that can cause serious health and economic problems in the endemic foci. CE is globally distributed in various climatic conditions from circumpolar to tropical latitudes. Iran is an important endemic area with a spectrum of weather conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of geo-climatic factors on the distribution of livestock CE in south-western Iran (SWI) in 2016 to 2018. Data of livestock CE were retrieved from veterinary organizations of four provinces of SWI. The geo-climatic factors, including mean annual temperature (MAT), minimum MAT (MinMAT), maximum MAT (MaxMAT), mean annual rainfall (MAR), elevation, mean annual evaporation (MAE), sunny hours, wind speed, mean annual humidity (MAH), slope, frost days and land cover, were analysed using geographical information systems (GIS) approaches. The statistical analysis showed that MAR, frost days, elevation, slope and semi-condensed forest land cover were positively and MAE, MAT, MaxMAT, MinMAT and salt and salinity land cover were negatively correlated with CE occurrence. MAE was shown to be a predictive factor in the stepwise linear logistic regression model. In short, the current GIS-based study found that areas with lower evaporation were the main CE risk zones, though those with lower temperature and higher rainfall, altitude and slope, especially where covered with or in close proximity of semi-condensed forest, should be prioritized for consideration by health professionals and veterinarians for conducting control programmes in SWI.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a helminthic zoonosis caused by the canid tapeworms, Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato. This disease occurs in a number of herbivorous and omnivorous animals (e.g. sheep, goat, cattle, camel, horse, buffalo, cervid and swine) as intermediate hosts and humans as accidental hosts by ingesting parasite eggs in contaminated water, soil, vegetables, etc. CE is globally distributed and is common in some regions of the Mediterranean Basin, South America, south-western and central Asia, Siberia, western China, northern Africa, southern and eastern Europe and the Middle East (Farhadi et al., Reference Farhadi, Haniloo, Rostamizadeh and Faghihzadeh2018; Gao et al., Reference Gao, Wang, Shi, Steverding, Wang, Yang and Zhou2018; Tamarozzi et al., Reference Tajbakhsh, Eisakhani and Fazl2018; Khademvatan et al., Reference Khademvatan, Majidiani, Foroutan, Tappeh, Aryamand and Khalkhali2019; Shafiei et al., Reference Sarkari, Sadjjadi, Beheshtian, Aghaee and Sedaghat2020). In fact, CE has been reported in a wide range of geo-climatic conditions such as circumpolar, temperate, subtropical and tropical zones (Rinaldi et al., Reference Rinaldi, Musella, Biggeri and Cringoli2014). Iran, as an endemic area in the Middle East with a variety of ecological and geographical conditions, is a good foci for CE development (Karamian et al., Reference Karamian, Haghighi, Hemmati, Taylor, Salehabadi and Ghatee2017). Similar to other parasites, E. granulosus biology and transmission are affected by the host–parasite association, behavioural traits, population density, habitat, environment and climatic conditions. For example, Echinococcus spp. ova survival can be affected by different geo-temporal parameters, including high temperature, low humidity and aridity (Veit et al., Reference Thevenet, Jensen, Drut, Cerrone, Grenóvero, Alvarez, Targovnik and Basualdo1995; Eckert & Deplazes, Reference Eckert and Deplazes2004; McManus, Reference McManus2010; Atkinson et al., Reference Atkinson, Gray, Clements, Barnes, McManus and Yang2013; Yan et al., Reference Veit, Bilger, Schad, Schäfer, Frank and Lucius2016; Byers et al., Reference Byers, Schmidt, Pappalardo, Haas and Stephens2019; Kołodziej-Sobocińska, Reference Kołodziej-Sobocińska2019). Understanding how parasites and their transmission are influenced by climatic changes and environmental conditions has become one of the most interesting topics among parasitology researchers (Okolo et al., Reference Okolo, Nnadi, Onyedibe and Ita2012). In recent years, the role of climatic changes and environmental conditions has been evaluated using specific tools and data analysis software programmes. Among the most valuable and functional tools are geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing technologies in health system programmes (Yilma & Malone, Reference Yan, Liang, Zheng and Zhu1998; Ghatee et al., Reference Ghatee, Sharifi, Haghdoost, Kanannejad, Taabody, Hatam and Abdollahipanah2013; Lyseen et al., Reference Lyseen, Nøhr, Sørensen, Gudes, Geraghty, Shaw, Bivona-Tellez and Group2014). GIS technology, as a computer-based system, analyses geospatial-referenced data and plays an important role in the surveillance of parasitic diseases. Researchers have used these approaches to study the interactions of parasites, hosts and reservoirs with geo-climatic factors, identify high- or low-risk areas for the disease spread and plan control strategies (Danson et al., Reference Danson, Bowyer, Pleydell and Craig2004; Rinaldi et al., Reference Rinaldi, Brunetti, Neumayr, Maestri, Goblirsch and Tamarozzi2006; Brundu et al., Reference Brundu, Piseddu, Stegel, Masu, Ledda and Masala2014). Although CE is a health problem in the southern and northern hemispheres (Eckert & Deplazes, Reference Eckert and Deplazes2004), most GIS-based studies have investigated the correlation between eco-geographical factors and the distribution of alveolar echinococcosis, and only a few studies have addressed the spatial distribution of CE using this approach (Staubach et al., Reference Sobhani, Zengir and Yazdani2001; Danson et al., Reference Danson, Bowyer, Pleydell and Craig2004; Pleydell et al., Reference Pleydell, Raoul, Tourneux, Danson, Graham, Craig and Giraudoux2004; Graham et al., Reference Graham, Danson and Craig2005; Cringoli et al., Reference Cringoli, Rinaldi, Musella, Veneziano, Maurelli, Di Pietro, Frisiello and Di Pietro2007). Therefore, in this study, we sought to determine the effects of geo-climatic factors on CE in south-western Iran (SWI) using the GIS approach during 2016–2018.

Materials and methods

Study area

SWI (fig. 1), with a surface area of about 230,567 km2, is located at approximately 27°N–31°N latitude and 47°E–55°E longitude and inhabits a population of 11.5 million people. The studied area consists of 74 counties in the four provinces of Khuzestan (27 counties), Fars (29 counties), Bushehr (ten counties), and Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad (eight counties). There are various climatic regions in SWI, including the Zagros mountain range extending from north to south, with moderately cold winters and temperate summers, plains with rainy mild winters and hot and dry summers and coastal regions of the Persian Gulf, with mild winters and hot and humid summers. These geo-climatic variations cause a variety of plants and land cover, and, consequently, various domestic and wild animals in SWI. The main native domestic animals in this area include sheep, goat, cattle, camel, buffalo, horse, donkey, dog and cat, and wild animals are deer, wild goat, ram, ewe, fox, wolf, jackal, bear and panther (Ghasem et al., Reference Ghasem, Shamsipour, Miri and Safarrad2012; Sagheb-Talebi et al., Reference Rinaldi, Musella, Biggeri and Cringoli2014). According to the Veterinary Bureau consensus, the population of small and large livestock was over 13 million in these provinces during 2016–2018. In detail, it was about 6.2, 4.4, 2.2 and 1 million in Khuzestan, Fars, Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, and Bushehr provinces, respectively. These areas are dominated by different land covers, ranging from forests and irrigated and rich agricultural lands to bare and salty areas. Altitude varies from Dena Mountain (4283 m, as the second highest summit of Iran) in the Zagros Mountains to the lowest grounds in Khuzestan and Bushehr provinces, where there are tens of hundreds of kilometres of coastal areas alongside the Persian Gulf. Various urban, rural and nomadic populations live in SWI. Nomadic tribes live on herding and migrate annually from warm areas to cold ones – that is, from highland pastures in summer (Yailaq) to winter habitations (Qishlag) and vice versa, with their livestock and shepherd dogs. These animals have been found to play a role in the prevalence of some parasitological diseases in SWI (Sarkari et al., Reference Sagheb-Talebi, Pourhashemi and Sajedi2010; Ghatee et al., Reference Ghatee, Haghdoost, Kooreshnia, Kanannejad, Parisaie, Karamian and Moshfe2018; Kanannejad et al., Reference Kanannejad, Haghdoost, Ghatee, Azarifar, Shahriari and Moshfe2019; Moshfe et al., Reference Moshfe, Sarkari, Arefkhah, Nikbakht, Shahriarirad, Rezaei, Jamshidi and Moradian2019; Ghadimi-Moghadam et al., Reference Ghadimi-Moghadam, Salahi, Ghatee, Ghadimi-Moghadam, Kanannejad, Mosavi, Ramshk and Khoramrooz2020).

Fig. 1. Location of studied areas in south-western Iran.

Livestock CE data collection

Comprehensive information about slaughtered livestock (e.g. number and type of animals, infection type, infected tissue, carcass weight, etc.) is routinely recorded by the Iranian National Veterinary Organization. Therefore, we retrieved the required data, including the total number and types of livestock (i.e. goat, sheep, cattle, camel and buffalo) infected with CE, from the veterinary bureaus of provinces of SWI for a three-year period (2016–2018). The data were categorized based on the livestock species belonging to each county and then entered into Microsoft Excel, (2016).

Geographical and climatic data collection

Meteorological data included mean annual rainfall (MAR), mean annual humidity (MAH), mean annual evaporation (MAE), the annual frequency of frost days, the mean number of sunny hours, mean annual wind speed, mean annual temperature (MAT), minimum MAT (MinMAT) and maximum MAT (MaxMAT). The data for the study period were retrieved from all the 62 synoptic stations (stations that collect meteorological data every 3 or 6 h) located in the studied areas. MAR, MAH and MAE raster layers were developed by the kriging interpolation method, and other meteorological layers were generated by the tension-based spline interpolation method with a resolution grid of 2 × 2 km after examining various interpolation models. Digital elevation model (DEM) raster layers and land cover vector layers (including features covering the province's surface) were retrieved from the Provincial Department of Agricultural Affairs. Layers belonging to the four provinces were merged to obtain one layer including all the SWI areas for each mentioned map. The slope raster layer was generated based on the DEM map by calculating the maximum rate of change in value between each cell and its neighbours by using the spatial analyst tool.

Geographical and climatic analysis

All the geo-climatic data were analysed using ArcGIS version 10.5 (http://www.esri.com/arcgis). The shapefile polygon layer of the SWI counties whose rate of total infection was previously enrolled within its attribute was used as the basic layer. The geometric intersection of the counties layer and the land cover polygonal shapefile was computed by an identity tool and then dissolved to unify all land cover feature polygons for each county. The sum of area (square km) of each land cover feature was calculated using the geometry tool for each county. Mean pixel values of DEM, slope, MAR, MAT, MaxMAT, MinMAT, MAH, MAE, frost days and sunny hours’ raster layers were calculated for each county by zonal statistics in the related tables. A final table encompassing all of the aforementioned data for SWI counties was drawn, and then it was converted to Excel format for statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

Having described the geographical distribution of livestock CE in SWI, in the first step of statistical analysis, we investigated the correlation between the total infected livestock rate (dependent variable) and geo-climatic factors (independent variables). Then, since all the variables in the study were quantitative, a stepwise linear regression model was developed for variables that had a significant correlation with the dependent factor to investigate the probable predictors. The analyses were carried out using SPSS, version 21 (IBM Corp).

Results

Geographical distribution of livestock CE in SWI

The overall prevalence of CE in slaughtered livestock was 9% in SWI. The highest and lowest rates of infection belonged to buffalo (11.6%) and goat (7.7%). Also, the overall highest infection rate was related to Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad (14.3%) and the lowest infection rate was found in Fars province (7.6%) (table 1). Based on the geographical distribution of CE, the most infected counties were distributed throughout a hypothetical band stretching from north-west (north and centre of Khuzestan province) towards central and south-eastern areas (i.e. from Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad to the centre of Fars province). The distribution of infected livestock is shown in fig. 2(a–f).

Fig. 2. Prevalence (infection rate %) and geographical distribution of livestock CE in south-western Iran. (a) Distribution of total infected livestock. (b) Infected sheep were mostly found in eastern, south-eastern and northern counties of Fars, some north-western, northern and eastern counties in Khuzestan, and approximately throughout Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad province. (c) The highest prevalence of infected goats was in north of Khuzestan, centre of Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, and some parts in north, west and south-west of Fars, and south-east of Bushehr province. (d) North-western, central, northern and western counties of Khuzestan, eastern counties of Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, and northern areas of Fars province were shown to be the main infected areas for cattle. (e) Infected camels were mostly found in the west of Khuzestan, north and south of Fars, and west and centre of Bushehr province. (f) Infected buffalo were mostly observed in north-west, centre and west of Khuzestan, two eastern counties of Fars and western counties of Bushehr province.

Table 1. Province-based distribution of livestock CE in south-western Iran (2016–2018).

– There is no camel and buffalo husbandry.

Effects of geographical and climatic factors on CE

Pearson correlation analysis showed that MAR, frost days, elevation, slope and surface of semi-condensed forest landcover were positively associated with CE rate in SWI, and rainfall was found to have the highest correlation. MAE, MAT, MaxMAT, MinMAT and salinity land cover showed a significant negative correlation (P < 0.05) with the CE occurrence (table 2 and fig. 3). A decreasing trend in CE rate was found with the increase in sunny hours in most parts of SWI (areas with 3358–3652 sunny hours based on the map); however, no significant correlation was found in this regard (P = 0.09; fig. 3). Also, there was no significant correlation between humidity, wind speed and land covers of bare lands, thin rangelands, condensed rangelands, irrigated farms and gardens, semi-condensed rangelands, riverbeds, swamps, urban, sandy areas and canebrakes with CE infection rate, although an inverse R was recorded for them. Positive but not significant correlations were shown between the distribution of CE and condensed forest rained farms and gardens, and thin forest land covers (table 2). To evaluate the effect of these factors on the occurrence of CE, a stepwise linear regression model was developed with the model fitness of approximately 60% (R square = 0.601). MAE (P < 0.001; beta = −0.60) was found to be a predictive factor in the stepwise model, while MAT (P = 0.841; beta = −0.024), MaxMAT (P = 0.85; beta = −0.02), MinMAT (P = 0.94; beta = −0.01), MAR (P = 0.67; beta = 0.07), elevation (P = 0.89; beta = −0.01), slope (P = 0.65; beta = −0.05), frost days (P = 0.84; beta = 0.02), semi-condensed forests (P = 0.72; beta = −0.04) and salinity land covers (P = 0.54; beta = −0.06) were excluded from the model.

Fig. 3. Geo-climatic factors and CE distribution in south-western Iran. MAR (a), elevation (b), slope (c), frost days (d) and semi-condensed forest land cover (e) were positively correlated with CE rate. MAE (f), MAT (g), MaxMAT (h), MinMAT (i) and salt land (e) were negatively associated with CE incidence. No significant relationship was found between wind velocity (j) and MAH (k) and CE rate, while a non-significant association was found between sunny hours (l) and disease prevalence. Maps show that most counties with the highest CE rate had 458–636 mm annual rainfall, 41–98 frost days, 10–30 degree slope, 123–1576 mm/day evaporation and 15–29°C MAT.

Table 2. Pearson correlation between geo-climatic factors and total rate of CE in south-western Iran.

* Significant factors (P-value < 0.05).

– Negative correlation with CE occurrence.

MAR, mean annual rainfall; MaxMAT, maximum mean annual temperature; MinMAT, minimum mean annual temperature; MAT, mean annual temperature.

Discussion

The current study revealed that MAE is the most important predictor of livestock CE in SWI, although CE infection rate was also positively correlated with MAR, frost days, elevation, slope and surface of semi-condensed forest land cover, and negatively with MAT, MaxMAT, MinMAT and salinity land cover. There was a trend between sunny hours and CE occurrence in this region.

The effect of MAE as the most important predictor of CE distribution in SWI is probably due to its impact on soil aridity that decreases egg viability and transmission capability. Some studies confirmed that Echinococcus spp. egg is sensitive to dryness and survives only for a short time if exposed to direct sunlight and dryness (Thevenet et al., Reference Tamarozzi, Akhan and Cretu2005). The study by Staubach et al. (Reference Sobhani, Zengir and Yazdani2001) showed dryness as a limiting factor in the tenacity of Echinococcus multilocularis oncospheres in eggs. Furthermore, increased evaporation is related to the expansion of drought and salt lands, and reduced growth of plants and rangelands, which can provide a hostile environment for egg survival (Tajbakhsh et al., Reference Staubach, Thulke, Tackmann, Hugh-Jones and Conraths2015).

Our study revealed an inverse relationship between salinity and CE occurrence in SWI, explaining why husbandry in this area is less common than elsewhere. On the other hand, due to the presence of salt in this area and its ovicidal effect, the parasite's life cycle will most likely not be completed (Craig & Macpherson, Reference Craig and Macpherson1988)

Semi-condensed forests directly affect CE occurrence in SWI. In recent years, climatic changes and drought have increased in the Middle East, especially in Iran (as a country with more than 82% of its area locates in arid and semi-arid zones), where the average rainfall (250 mm) has decreased to one-third of the world's rainfall average (860 mm) (Amiri & Eslamian, Reference Amiri and Eslamian2010; Sobhani et al., Reference Shafiei, Ghatee, Jafarzadeh, Javanshir and Karamian2020). Drought is more severe in some parts of Iran such as south-western, southern, south-eastern and central regions (Raziei et al., Reference Raziei, Saghafian, Paulo, Pereira and Bordi2009; Abarghouei et al., Reference Abarghouei, Zarch, Dastorani, Kousari and Zarch2011). Climate change and drought have forced rural and nomadic communities to migrate and settle in greener places such as semi-condensed forest areas, river banks and green rangeland areas, and wherever water sources and feedstuff are available for their livestock (Keshavarz et al., Reference Keshavarz, Karami and Vanclay2013; Rashednasab et al., Reference Rashednasab, Ahmadvand and Sharifzadeh2018). Higher soil wetness and more shadow in these regions may increase the chance of survival of eggs excreted by the definitive host, leading to the infection of intermediate hosts. Also, semi-condensed forests, as the habitat of carnivorous canids such as stray dogs, wolves, foxes and jackals, as the definitive hosts for E. granulosus, are mostly located at higher-altitude hillsides and in the close proximity of mountainous villages and nomadic shelters, which are suitable conditions for the maintenance of the parasite cycle (Otero-Abad & Torgerson, Reference Otero-Abad and Torgerson2013; Farimani et al., Reference Farimani, Raufirad, Hunter and Lebailly2017).

Other significant factors related to CE in the present study were rainfall, temperature, elevation, slope and frost days. According to fig. 3, there is a comprehensive overlap between these factors. For example, with increasing levels of elevation, elevated MAR and disease burden have been reported. The effect of MAR on CE distribution is understandable. Rainfall contributes to the expansion of green rangelands and forests, and increases the amount of forage for livestock, which results in higher herding and infection rates. In addition, rainfall can increase the relative humidity and the balance between temperature and humidity, which is needed for the survival of parasite eggs. There was a negative association between different temperature models and CE in our study, and the schematic temperature map (fig. 3) showed that higher rates of CE infection have been found in areas with 15°C–29°C MAT, while CE prevalence was reduced in areas where MAT was above 30°C. This is because of higher susceptibility of parasite eggs to higher temperatures, dryness and dehydration. For example, in some studies it was observed that Echinococcus eggs were disinfected by high temperatures (hot water of 85°C or above) and desiccation, while they could survive in freezing conditions. However, they can be killed by freezing at –80°C for 48 h or –70°C for four days (Colli & Williams, Reference Colli and Williams1972; Eckert & Deplazes, Reference Eckert and Deplazes2004; Federer et al., Reference Federer, Armua-Fernandez, Hoby, Wenker and Deplazes2015; Cédric et al., Reference Cédric, Frits and Silivia2019). The results of the Harriott et al. (Reference Harriott, Gentle, Traub, Cobbold and Magalhães2019) study in Queensland, Australia, showed that CE infection rate significantly increased with higher rainfall, relative humidity and temperature. Veit et al. (Reference Thevenet, Jensen, Drut, Cerrone, Grenóvero, Alvarez, Targovnik and Basualdo1995) presented that E. multilocularis eggs were highly sensitive to elevated temperatures and to desiccation as far as the eggs’ infectivity was lost after 3 h at 45°C. Kern et al. (Reference Kern, Ammon, Kron, Sinn, Sander, Petersen, Gaus and Kern2004) presented that E. multilocularis eggs can remain infective for months under suitable conditions such as low temperatures and high humidity.

Although in the present study there was no significant correlation between MAH and CE prevalence, most counties with higher rates of infection were within 35–40% relative humidity range. In some counties of Bushehr and Khuzestan provinces with high humidity (>40%), the prevalence of CE was lower than other counties in SWI. This finding can be explained by the higher MAT, MaxMAT and MAE in these areas, which can reduce the infection rate.

It should be noted that due to the lack of accurate information as to the geographical distribution of the parasite's definitive and accidental hosts (carnivores and human) in SWI during the present study, further comprehensive studies are recommended to determine the effects of geo-climatic factors on the prevalence of CE in the parasite's definitive and intermediate hosts in SWI and other regions of Iran.

Conclusion

In short, GIS-based analysis showed that some of the geo-climatic factors such as MAE, as the main predictive factor, and MAT, MinMAT, MaxMAT, MAR, elevation, slope, land cover of the semi-condensed forest and salinity lands had significant correlation with CE distribution in SWI. Accordingly, areas with lower evaporation and temperature and higher rainfall, especially those covered by semi-condensed forest, mostly found in mountainous higher altitudes, should be prioritized for consideration as probable CE risk zones. GIS, as a powerful descriptive and analytical tool that identifies risk factors associated with livestock population and the distribution of hydatidosis, can help health professionals and veterinarians identify high-risk regions and assess the performance of control programmes in SWI.

Acknowledgements

This article is part of a PhD thesis in medical parasitology (number A-12-95-13) supported by Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. Special thanks and appreciation to the Veterinary Bureau consensus and Weather Bureau in Fars, Khuzestan, Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, and Bushehr provinces for their assistance in collecting meteorological, geo-climatic data and information of livestock's CE in SWI required for this study. We also thank all collaborators involved in the project.

Financial support

This article was financially supported by Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (No: A-12-95-13) and approved by Ethics committee of Zanjan Univwersity of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.ZUMS.REC.1397.252).

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

Abarghouei, HB, Zarch, MAA, Dastorani, MT, Kousari, MR and Zarch, MS (2011) The survey of climatic drought trend in Iran. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 25, 851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amiri, M and Eslamian, S (2010) Investigation of climate change in Iran. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 3, 208216.Google Scholar
Atkinson, JAM, Gray, DJ, Clements, AC, Barnes, TS, McManus, DP and Yang, YR (2013) Environmental changes impacting Echinococcus transmission: research to support predictive surveillance and control. Global Change Biology 19, 677688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brundu, D, Piseddu, T, Stegel, G, Masu, G, Ledda, S and Masala, G (2014) Retrospective study of human cystic echinococcosis in Italy based on the analysis of hospital discharge records between 2001 and 2012. Acta Tropica 140, 9196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers, JE, Schmidt, J, Pappalardo, P, Haas, SE and Stephens, PR (2019) What factors explain the geographical range of mammalian parasites? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286, 20190673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cédric, G, Frits, F, Silivia, M, et al. (2019) Inactivation of parasite transmission stages: efficacy of treatments on foods of non-animal origin. Trends in Food Science & Technology 91, 1223.Google Scholar
Colli, CW and Williams, J (1972) Influence of temperature on the infectivity of eggs of Echinococcus granulosus in laboratory rodents. The Journal of Parasitology 58, 422426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, P and Macpherson, C (1988) Sodium hypochlorite as an ovicide for echinococcus. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology 82, 211213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cringoli, G, Rinaldi, L, Musella, V, Veneziano, V, Maurelli, MP, Di Pietro, F, Frisiello, M and Di Pietro, S (2007) Geo-referencing livestock farms as tool for studying cystic echinococcosis epidemiology in cattle and water buffaloes from southern Italy. Geospatial Health 2, 105111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danson, F, Bowyer, P, Pleydell, D and Craig, P (2004) Echinococcus multilocularis: the role of satellite remote sensing. GIS and spatial modelling. South-East Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 35, 189193.Google Scholar
Eckert, J and Deplazes, P (2004) Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 17, 107135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farhadi, M, Haniloo, A, Rostamizadeh, K and Faghihzadeh, S (2018) Efficiency of flubendazole-loaded mPEG-PCL nanoparticles: a promising formulation against the protoscoleces and cysts of Echinococcus granulosus. Acta Tropica 187, 190200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farimani, SM, Raufirad, V, Hunter, R and Lebailly, P (2017) Coping strategies during drought: the case of rangeland users in southwest Iran. Rangelands 39, 133142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federer, K, Armua-Fernandez, MT, Hoby, S, Wenker, C and Deplazes, P (2015) In vivo viability of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs in a rodent model after different thermo-treatments. Experimental Parasitology 154, 1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, CH, Wang, JY, Shi, F, Steverding, D, Wang, X, Yang, YT and Zhou, XN (2018) Field evaluation of an immunochromatographic test for diagnosis of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis. Parasit Vectors 11, 311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghadimi-Moghadam, A, Salahi, M, Ghatee, MA, Ghadimi-Moghadam, A, Kanannejad, Z, Mosavi, A, Ramshk, O and Khoramrooz, S (2020) Environmental and climatic factors influencing the occurrence and distribution of tuberculosis in southwest Iran: a GIS-based study. Acta Medica Mediterranea 36, 557563.Google Scholar
Ghasem, A, Shamsipour, A, Miri, M and Safarrad, T (2012) Synoptic and remote sensing analysis of dust events in southwestern Iran. Natural Hazards 64, 16251638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghatee, MA, Sharifi, I, Haghdoost, AA, Kanannejad, Z, Taabody, Z, Hatam, G and Abdollahipanah, A (2013) Spatial correlations of population and ecological factors with distribution of visceral leishmaniasis cases in southwestern Iran. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases 50, 179.Google ScholarPubMed
Ghatee, MA, Haghdoost, AA, Kooreshnia, F, Kanannejad, Z, Parisaie, Z, Karamian, M and Moshfe, A (2018) Role of environmental, climatic risk factors and livestock animals on the occurrence of cutaneous leishmaniasis in newly emerging focus in Iran. Journal of Infection and Public Health 11, 425433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, A, Danson, F and Craig, P (2005) Ecological epidemiology: the role of landscape structure in the transmission risk of the fox tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis (Leukart 1863) (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea: Taeniidae). Progress in Physical Geography 29, 7791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harriott, L, Gentle, M, Traub, R, Cobbold, R and Magalhães, RS (2019) Geographical distribution and risk factors for Echinococcus granulosus infection in peri-urban wild dog populations. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 10, 149155.Google ScholarPubMed
Kanannejad, Z, Haghdoost, A, Ghatee, MA, Azarifar, F, Shahriari, S and Moshfe, A (2019) Effect of human, livestock population, climatic and environmental factors on the distribution of brucellosis in southwest Iran. Acta Medica Mediterranea 36, 557Google Scholar
Karamian, M, Haghighi, F, Hemmati, M, Taylor, WR, Salehabadi, A and Ghatee, MA (2017) Heterogenity of Echinococcus canadensis genotype 6 - the main causative agent of cystic echinococcosis in Birjand, Eastern Iran. Vet Parasitol 245, 7885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kern, P, Ammon, A, Kron, M, Sinn, G, Sander, S, Petersen, LR, Gaus, W and Kern, P (2004) Risk factors for alveolar echinococcosis in humans. Emerging Infectious Diseases 10, 2088.Google ScholarPubMed
Keshavarz, M, Karami, E and Vanclay, F (2013) The social experience of drought in rural Iran. Land Use Policy 30, 120129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khademvatan, S, Majidiani, H, Foroutan, M, Tappeh, KH, Aryamand, S and Khalkhali, H (2019) Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in Iran: a systematic review. Journal of Helminthology 93, 131138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kołodziej-Sobocińska, M (2019) Factors affecting the spread of parasites in populations of wild European terrestrial mammals. Mammal Research 64, 301318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyseen, AK, Nøhr, C, Sørensen, EM, Gudes, O, Geraghty, E, Shaw, N, Bivona-Tellez, C and Group, IHGW (2014) A review and framework for categorizing current research and development in health related geographical information systems (GIS) studies. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 23, 110124.Google Scholar
McManus, DP (2010) Echinococcosis with particular reference to Southeast Asia. Advances in Parasitology 72, 267303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moshfe, A, Sarkari, B, Arefkhah, N, Nikbakht, R, Shahriarirad, R, Rezaei, Z, Jamshidi, A and Moradian, F (2019) Seroepidemiological study of cystic echinococcosis in nomadic communities in the southwest of Iran: A population-based study. Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry 40, 183192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okolo, M, Nnadi, N, Onyedibe, K and Ita, OI (2012) Will climate change affect parasite-host relationship? Jos Journal of Medicine 6, 2731.Google Scholar
Otero-Abad, B and Torgerson, PR (2013) A systematic review of the epidemiology of echinococcosis in domestic and wild animals. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pleydell, D, Raoul, F, Tourneux, F, Danson, F, Graham, A, Craig, P and Giraudoux, P (2004) Modelling the spatial distribution of Echinococcus multilocularis infection in foxes. Acta Tropica 91, 253265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rashednasab, K, Ahmadvand, M and Sharifzadeh, M (2018) Drought Analysis: behavior management and its influencing factors in nomad of Darila region, Gachsaran County. Journal of Rural Research 9, 88101.Google Scholar
Raziei, T, Saghafian, B, Paulo, AA, Pereira, LS and Bordi, I (2009) Spatial patterns and temporal variability of drought in western Iran. Water Resources Management 23, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, L, Musella, V, Biggeri, A and Cringoli, G (2006) New insights into the application of geographical information systems and remote sensing in veterinary parasitology. Geospatial Health 1, 3347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinaldi, F, Brunetti, E, Neumayr, A, Maestri, M, Goblirsch, S and Tamarozzi, F (2014) Cystic echinococcosis of the liver: a primer for hepatologists. World Journal of Hepatology 6, 293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sagheb-Talebi, K, Pourhashemi, M and Sajedi, T (2014) Forests of Iran: a treasure from the past, a hope for the future, vol. 10. Switzerland, Springer, pp. 8151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkari, B, Sadjjadi, S, Beheshtian, M, Aghaee, M and Sedaghat, F (2010) Human cystic Echinococcosis in Yasuj district in Southwest of Iran: an epidemiological study of seroprevalence and surgical cases over a ten-year period. Zoonoses and Public Health 57, 146150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafiei, R, Ghatee, M, Jafarzadeh, F, Javanshir, Z and Karamian, M (2020) Genotyping and phylogenetic analysis of unusually located hydatid cysts isolated from humans in north-east Iran. Journal of Helminthology 94, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobhani, B, Zengir, VS and Yazdani, MH (2020) Modelling, evaluation and simulation of drought in Iran, southwest Asia. Journal of Earth System Science 129, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staubach, C, Thulke, H-h, Tackmann, K, Hugh-Jones, M and Conraths, FJ (2001) Geographic information system-aided analysis of factors associated with the spatial distribution of Echinococcus multilocularis infections of foxes. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 65, 943948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajbakhsh, S, Eisakhani, N and Fazl, KA (2015) Assessment of meteorological drought in Iran using standardized precipitation and evapotranspiration index (SPEI). Journal of the Earth and Space Phisics 41, 313321 (in Persian).Google Scholar
Tamarozzi, F, Akhan, O, Cretu, CM, et al. (2018) Prevalence of abdominal cystic echinococcosis in rural Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey: a cross-sectional, ultrasound-based, population study from the HERACLES project. Lancet Infect Dis 18, 769778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thevenet, PS, Jensen, O, Drut, R, Cerrone, GE, Grenóvero, MS, Alvarez, HM, Targovnik, HM and Basualdo, JA (2005) Viability and infectiousness of eggs of Echinococcus granulosus aged under natural conditions of inferior arid climate. Veterinary Parasitology 133, 7177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veit, P, Bilger, B, Schad, V, Schäfer, J, Frank, W and Lucius, R (1995) Influence of environmental factors on the infectivity of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs. Parasitology 110, 7986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, C, Liang, L-J, Zheng, K-Y and Zhu, X-Q (2016) Impact of environmental factors on the emergence, transmission and distribution of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasites & vectors 9, 137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yilma, J and Malone, J (1998) A geographic information system forecast model for strategic control of fasciolosis in Ethiopia. Veterinary Parasitology 78, 103127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location of studied areas in south-western Iran.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Prevalence (infection rate %) and geographical distribution of livestock CE in south-western Iran. (a) Distribution of total infected livestock. (b) Infected sheep were mostly found in eastern, south-eastern and northern counties of Fars, some north-western, northern and eastern counties in Khuzestan, and approximately throughout Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad province. (c) The highest prevalence of infected goats was in north of Khuzestan, centre of Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, and some parts in north, west and south-west of Fars, and south-east of Bushehr province. (d) North-western, central, northern and western counties of Khuzestan, eastern counties of Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, and northern areas of Fars province were shown to be the main infected areas for cattle. (e) Infected camels were mostly found in the west of Khuzestan, north and south of Fars, and west and centre of Bushehr province. (f) Infected buffalo were mostly observed in north-west, centre and west of Khuzestan, two eastern counties of Fars and western counties of Bushehr province.

Figure 2

Table 1. Province-based distribution of livestock CE in south-western Iran (2016–2018).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Geo-climatic factors and CE distribution in south-western Iran. MAR (a), elevation (b), slope (c), frost days (d) and semi-condensed forest land cover (e) were positively correlated with CE rate. MAE (f), MAT (g), MaxMAT (h), MinMAT (i) and salt land (e) were negatively associated with CE incidence. No significant relationship was found between wind velocity (j) and MAH (k) and CE rate, while a non-significant association was found between sunny hours (l) and disease prevalence. Maps show that most counties with the highest CE rate had 458–636 mm annual rainfall, 41–98 frost days, 10–30 degree slope, 123–1576 mm/day evaporation and 15–29°C MAT.

Figure 4

Table 2. Pearson correlation between geo-climatic factors and total rate of CE in south-western Iran.