Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T16:36:55.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of the Metacercaria and Adhesive Organ of Mesostephanus yedeae Dennis and Penner, 1971 (Trematoda: Cyathocotylidae), and their Effects on Host Tissues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Emmet A. Dennis
Emmet A. Dennis
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and The Bureau of Biological Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Development of the infective metacercaria of Mesostephanus yedeae Dennis and Penner, 1971 included: (a) ceicarial penetration and encystment in striated muscles, brain, liver and eye of Poecilia reticulata Peters; (b) a quiescent phase of nine days when no observable morphological change occurred; (c) a period of morphogenesis when an adhesive organ and a posterior body segment were differentiated. The time required for development to the infective metacercaria was delayed by decreasing the temperature of the fish host environment. The quiescent phase exhibited the greatest effects resulting from lowered temperature. Radial muscles and glands of the adhesive organ originated from parenchymal beta cells. The posterior appendage issued as a dorso-posterior evagination of the metacercarial body. Effects of the metacercaria on host tissues resulted in formation of a fibrous capsule in striated muscles, a granulomatous-like response in liver tissue, and necrosis of nervous tissue of the retinal complex which terminated in blindness of the infected eye. Effects of the adhesive organ on duodenal villi of the definitive host included “tearing” of the lamina propria and “pinching off” of pieces of duodenal epithelium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 1973 , pp. 61 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheng, T. C. and Provenza, D. V., 1960.—“Studies on cellular elements of the mesenchyma and tissues of Hemaloloechus confusus Ingles, 1932 (Trematoda).” Trans. Amer. Microscop. Soc., 79, 170–179.Google Scholar
Erasmus, D. A., 1962.—“Studies on the adult and metacercaria of Holostephanus luhei Szidat, 1936.” Parasitology, 52, 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erasmus, D. A. and Öhman, C., 1963.—“The structure and function of the adhesive organ in strigeid trematodes.” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 113, 7–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erasmus, D. A., 1965.—“Electron microscope studies of the gland cells and host-parasite interface of the adhesive organ of Cyathocotyle bushiensis Khan, 1962.” J. Parasitol., 51, 761–769.Google Scholar
Hoffman, G. L., 1960.—“Synopsis of Strigeoidea (Trematoda) of fishes and their life cycles.” Fish. Bull., (175) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv., 60, 439–469.Google Scholar
Hoffman, G. L. and Dunbar, C. E. E., 1963.—“Studies on Neogogatea kentuckiensis (Cable, 1935) n.comb. (Trematoda: Strigeoidea: Cyathocotylidae).” J. Parasitol., 49, 737–744.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. W. III and Hamilton, J. M., 1941.—“Studies on host-parasite reactions of larval parasites. IV. The cyst of Uvulifer ambloplitis (Hughes).” Trans. Amer. Microscop. Soc., 60, 498–507.Google Scholar
Öhman, C., 1966.—“The structure and function of the adhesive organ in strigeid trematodes IV. Holostephanus luhei Szidat, 1936.” Parasitology, 56, 481–495.Google Scholar
Szidat, L., 1929.—“Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Gattung Strigea (Abildg.). I. Allgemeiner Teil: Untersuchungen uber die Morphologie, Physiologic und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Holostomiden nebst Bemerkungen uber die Metamorphose der Trematoden und die Phylogenie derselben.” Alschr. Parasitenk., Berl. 1, 621–687.Google Scholar