¹ Boeder, H., ‘Der frühgriechische Wortgebrauch von Logos und Aletheia’, Archiv für Begrijfsgeschichte iv (1959) 91Google Scholar, observes that ἀλήθεια and ἀληθής are never used as predicate or attribute with the exception of Hes. Th. 233.

² Boeder (n. 1) 91 remarks that the pre-Homeric ἐτεόν (‘true’) is replaced by σαϕής,νημερτής, and esp. ἀληθής; cf. ibid. 98.

³ van der Ben, N., The Proem of Empedocles' Peri Physios (Amsterdam 1975) 107.Google Scholar

⁴ Guthrie, W. K. C., A History of Greek Philosophy ii (Cambridge 1965) 255.Google Scholar

⁵ Wright, M. R., Empedocles: the extant fragments (New Haven/London 1981) 280.Google Scholar

⁶ For the implications of this word see West, M. L., Hesiod, Theogony (Oxford 1966)Google Scholarad loc.

⁷ For Lethe and its negative ἀληθής see West (n. 6) 230–1, 233, Boeder (n. 1) 92–4.

⁸ Boeder (n. i) 93 argues that ‘the λήθων prevents his knowledge from being shared with someone else’—which could be qualified as ἀϕανές or ἄδηλον: but the former word is not found in epic at all, while the latter is found once meaning ‘invisible’ (Hes. Erga 6).

⁹ For τὸ σαϕές (‘Klarheit und Zuverlässigkeit die auf Augenzeugenschaft beruht’) see Fraenkel, H., Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums (Munchen 1962) 382Google Scholar 3, esp. n. 20; also id., Frühgriechisches Denken (München i960) 342–9.

¹⁰ Page, D. L., Euripides Medea² (Oxford 1952).Google Scholar

¹¹ Lloyd, G. E. R., Polarity and Analogy (Cambridge 1966) 63 n. 1.Google Scholar

¹² von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U., Sitz. d.preuss. Akad. d. Wiss. Berlin 1929, 639 f.Google Scholar

¹³ Stanford, W. B., Sophocles Ajax (London 1963).Google Scholar

¹⁴ Fraenkel, E., Aeschylus Agamemnon (Oxford 1950).Google Scholar